Alright everyone, today, we are going to talk about the latest entry in the Marvel Studios/Disney library. Starring Kit Harrington, Angelina Jolie, Salma Hayek, and a few others, the movie is Eternals.
Plot: First set in 5000 BC, a group of immortal beings called Eternals are assigned to destroy Deviants, a group of evil creatures that are hellbent on destroying the world. Though they initially destroy the last of them in 1521 AD, the Deviants are brought back to life, ready to wreak havoc once again in present day London, England. With Ikaris, and Sersi (played by Richard Madden, and Gemma Chan respectively) as leaders of the Eternals, will this group of immortal beings succeed in ridding the world, and universe of these monsters once and for all?
Friends, I hate to be the bearer of bad news! Eternals may yet be one of the weakest, possibly even worst of this group of superhero films, especially when it comes to ones being released in recent years. Yes, the musical score is good. The film may also be filled with very good action. And yes, the special effects, the visuals, as well as the very few comedic scenes may be good too.
Overall, however, Eternals doesn’t seem to be worth one’s time as much as other recent Marvel films before it. First off, when the immortals are living normal lives for a period of time, what the heck is with one of the immortals being a gay guy, and having a gay relationship with another man? Seriously, if the Eternals are supposed to be good immortal creatures that fight for good, and justice in the world, a gay element has NO business in the world of the immortal characters. It’s one thing for mortal human characters to be gay, or lesbian. But it’s totally another to make an immortal character in a fictional story/world gay, or lesbian, wouldn’t you say? Additionally, putting things like that aside, the story seems to feel very confusing, as well as convoluted. I mean, despite the story being a little over two and a half hours long, either because this film crammed too many characters in, or tried too hard to expand on the story, or something like that, the story fails to be as good as the other Marvel movies on nearly every level. Speaking of characters, the characters also don’t seem to be developed all that well. Yeah, certain plot twists that involved some of the characters were nice on the surface. However, one can’t necessarily say that those plot twists worked well, especially since there wasn’t much buildup in that regard. And not to mention that some of those characters seem to be all that likable. Some of them are, yes, but a few of them aren’t, you know? As for the ending, there were certain aspects of it that felt rather puzzling, and confusing.
And that’s my review for the new Marvel/Disney film, Eternals. Yeah, besides giving movies like 2019’s Captain Marvel not as good of a review a long while back, I’m not normally one to give movies like Eternals a negative review. However, the filmmakers gave people like me, and I’m sure others, a reason to do so this time. It’s a shame, because movies like this seemed to have so much potential, despite it’s really long running time. I would say save your money for Spider-Man: No Way Home next month, or some film like that. Yes, Eternals may be part of the Marvel canon. Still, it’s far from one of their best works. Again, oh well! Well, let’s hope that if this film gets enough negative reviews from others, it won’t be as popular, and the filmmakers will learn a valuable lesson from making movies like this one.
Well, everyone, first off, happy Thanksgiving! I hope you all have had a really fun holiday of it. Second, we are going to talk about the latest Ghostbusters film, well known as Ghostbusters: Afterlife. Apparently, like the Space Jam sequel, this third Ghostbusters film had been in development since around the 1980s, or 1990s, but didn’t officially get off the ground until recently. Well, better late than never. So here we go!
Plot: When a single mother named Callie Spengler (Carrie Coon), and her two children, Trevor, and Phoebe (Finn Wolfhand, and McKenna Grace respectively) are evicted from their current home in New York City, they then go to a home in Summerville, Oklahoma that was willed to them sometime ago by Callie’s late father, Egon Spengler (Harold Ramis). But sometime later, the children, along with new friends that make, find some mines, and a mountain, that could potentially be haunted. Can the children uncover the mystery in these areas before things most likely get worse for anyone living in the Summerville area?
Okay, first off, I have a confession to make. I didn’t see the Ghostbusters films until a few years ago at a friend’s place. Probably a good thing too, in a way, so that people like myself can have a better understanding of the storyline for the third film, and the franchise overall, eh? So, how was this third installment? Well, I must say really good. First off, despite this film coming out years after the last Ghostbusters movie, the director, and other filmmakers of this third film do a fantastic job of capturing the spirit of the other films. Yes, the score is most likely a little better composed. And, of course, the visuals are undeniably more stunning as well. That is especially when it comes to the designs of the ghosts. Still, the movie does a really great job of capturing the storyline of what these films are supposed to be about. Also, the comedy is satisfactory, despite most likely not being quite as hilarious as the other two films. As for the action, I’m not going to go into details on what kind of action scenes occur in this film. However, I will at least say that they will make the audience enjoy this movie even more. That is especially since a great many of them are suspenseful, most notably when it comes to a pre-climax moment, and the climax itself. Oh, and the premise gets surprisingly very creative at points. Sure, some of the creativity for this installment seems to be saved for near the end of this film. Still, that doesn’t keep Ghostbusters: Afterlife from being any less enjoyable. Oh, and how could one not like the mystery elements that are added to this film as well? Finally, one can’t forget to mention that there are certain pleasant surprises in this film as well.
So, are there any flaws for this film? Well, there may be at least a couple. First off, there were one, or two plot holes in this film. Second, there were a couple characters that felt a little stereotypical, and not as likable as some of the other main characters because of that. Yeah, even those not as likable characters seem to be more likable towards the end, but it may have felt a little too late in the game at that point, you know? Oh well!
And that’s my review for Ghostbusters: Afterlife. It is a very clever movie overall. Even if it may be predictable at times, the film also has some very good plot twists as well. Not only that, but the film does have some elements that make it very engaging, and fun. Sure, it might be a little scary for kids, but even they will be able to still enjoy this film overall. Definitely make a point to see this film, especially if you have been a huge fan of this franchise. You’d be surprised as to how great of a job the filmmakers did with recapturing the spirit of the older films. Because of that, this film is most definitely worth seeing.
Ladies & gentlemen, today, we are going to be diving into something unexpected that I’m sure some of you might not have thought that I would cover. In this case, we are going to be talking about another one of those “Disney knock-offs” from the 1990s. For those of you who are new to my blog, I’ll give you a brief overview of what that apparently means. Basically, they were animated films released in the 1990s, that basically tried to act like many of the Disney films, especially those that were released around that time. As I’m sure some you know, I already reviewed a couple of those last year with The Swan Princess, and Quest For Camelot. Now, we shall talk about another animated film that was released when the 1990s were about to conclude, along with the Disney Renaissance period. Without further ado, let’s talk about the second animated movie to be directed by Richard Rich (his first film being 1994’s The Swan Princess, and the third being 2001’s The Trumpet Of The Swan). The one, and only, 1999’s The King & I. Yeah, Warner Bros. came up with the idea to make an animated remake of the 1956 live-action musical film of the same now. So how about that? Anyway, let’s begin.
Plot: Set in the year 1862, a schoolteacher named Anna Leonowens (Miranda Richardson), and her family travel from London to Siam to give the children of the palace an education, much to the displeasure of King Mongkut of Siam (Martin Vidnovic), who believes in sticking to traditions. But as the king, and his children begin to form a close relationship with Anna, and her family, will they begin to learn, and realize things about the world that they had never known before?
Alright, so there were a few reasons as to why I wanted to rewatch this particular film again after being absent from it for so many years. One was seeing a preview of it on Quest For Camelot last year, when I researched that film, and reviewed it. Second, I had that this film an overwhelming amount of negative reviews, even more so than animated films like Quest For Camelot, Chicken Little, and some of those animated films that received mostly mixed to negative reviews. So, after seeing quite a few films, and giving most of those positive reviews, I wanted to try to see if I could see a film that I could give a bad review for once. Oh, and after rewatching The Swan Princess last year, and hearing about both that film, and this one being directed by Richard Rich, that was another reason that I wanted to rewatch this film. Either way, I remember enjoying this film after seeing it as a kid. Does it hold up years later? Sadly, this 1999 remake of the 1956 classic film does not. I had never officially seen the famous 1956 version of the story, except for seeing trailers for it. However, from at least what I could gather from those trailers, it seemed like this animated cartoon was trying to recapture the spirit of this film. I mean yes, this film does apparently have quite a few of the same songs as the live-action one. Still, either because of this film only being an hour and a half long, most likely adding certain elements that don’t seem to work well in this case, or other reasons like those, this version of The King & I doesn’t even come close to living up to it’s full potential. First of all, most of the characters seem rather dull, and bland. That is with the exceptions of characters like Anna, King Mongkut Of Siam, and the villain, Kralahome, who all seem to be at least remotely interesting. Other than those three, the others, like the monkey, and the elephant characters, are just in there solely for comic relief, while others like Anna’s son, Prince Chulalongkorn, or Tuptim seem to feel like they’re crammed into this story. Sure, some of those seem to serve somewhat of a purpose at different points. Still, characters like them could have probably been used in a longer movie. Which that leads me to my next point, which would be the story. First off, The King & I, especially being made at a time that it was, seems to serve as proof that an animated remake of a classic musical was probably not going to work. Maybe if this film hadn’t been made until around 10-20 years later, or more, it might have been a different story. Was this film way ahead of it’s time? Maybe so! I mean when you compare this remake to say some of Disney’s recent live-action/CGI remakes, one can easily tell that most, if not all of those are superior. There doesn’t seem to be all that much in comparison. Oh, and did I forget to talk about there being one, or two subplots in this movie? Yeah, those subplots seem to make this film fall as well. I’m not saying subplots never work. In fact, they seem to work better in a film that might be around 2-2 1/2 hours, or a film like that. However, for some reason, when it comes to a film that’s around an hour and a half long, or some other reason along those lines, these particular subplots don’t seem to work quite nearly as well. Additionally, there’s at least some of the animation. Oh, don’t get me wrong, there are times when the animation is phenomenal. However, more often than not, the animation of this film seems to make this film feel more like a direct-to-video type of film rather than one that gets a theatrical release. There were also certain aspects towards the end that didn’t seem to feel entirely satisfying. In fact, you’ll probably find yourself asking questions about what truly came about certain characters, or things like that. There’s also most of the songs. Yes, there were one, or two that were okay. Overall, however, they didn’t seem to be all that memorable. And last, but not least, this film feels really corny, and childish. Okay, I understand that animated films are supposed to fall into the category of children’s/family entertainment. Still, if movie makers wanted to truly make an animated film like the Disney films especially in the 1990s, why make a film like this one as corny as it ended up being, you know?
But is there anything good about this film? Well, yes, thankfully! First of all, while the animation is so-so, there are a few times when the animation is amazing as well, most notably when it comes to shots of the kingdom of Siam, or even objects in the palace like the statues. Additionally, the acting is also really good. That is especially when it comes to Martin Vidnovic’s singing voice, especially during a song called “A Puzzlement,” in which he sings solo. in addition, at least there were a few times in the film where the movie makers attempted to put some heart into it, but didn’t succeed all that much. Oh well! Finally, the film does have a few good lines, especially the line about how “God is merciful.”
And that’s my review for the 1999 animated remake of The King & I. Well, must say that it was an okay feeling to review an okay film for the first time in a long while. After rewatching this film, I would now like to see the original 1956 version just to see how much better it is in comparison to this one. Personally, I would rather rewatch other non-Disney animated films from the 1990s, like The Prince Of Egypt, Quest For Camelot, or even The Swan Princess more than this film. This film lacks the magic that many other animated films have seemed to have overtime. Sure, there are a few saving graces in this film. And yes, at least this film does have some good lines. Still, unless you truly desire yo watch an animated film that could feel mediocre at best, I would say just stick to the 1956 version of this film, and watch, or rewatch better animated films. Well, on the brighter side, at least this film didn’t end up being successful enough that there would be remakes of other live-action musicals. I can only imagine how much worse any of those might have been.
Well, today, the wait is finally over. After being delayed from around the springtime of last year to around November, then April, and then finally to October of this year, the 25th James Bond film has officially arrived in theaters. Also, as I’m sure many of you know, hearing about this film being released was one of the main reasons why I watched the other 007 movies. So now, after waiting patiently for so long, let’s finally discuss 007: No Time To Die!
Plot: When a terrorist leader named Lyutsifer Safin (Rami Malek) begins developing a group of Nano bots that carry a deadly virus, which could kill millions, or more of the people in the world, if unleashed. Now, it is up to James Bond (Daniel Craig) to stop Safin from most likely destroying most of the world once and for all.
Well, as some of us may, or may not know, this is most likely supposed to be the last James Bond film overall, or the last one with Daniel Craig, something like that. One way, or another, did this movie go out with a bang? For the most part, yes, it did. First off, seeing as this is probably one of the longest, if not the longest of the James Bond movies to date, you’ll most likely find yourself understanding why after seeing this film. There was a great plenty to unpack in this film. Could it have been shorter? To a degree, probably! But more on that in a bit. Anyway, another plus for 007: No Time To Die is how really good the script is. I mean there are times when certain people say things that maybe they think they might mean at the time, but don’t seem to actually mean in the end. Because of that, this film, at points, can serve as a reminder as to why people need to be careful about what they say, or don’t say to others close to them. In addition to all of this, this particular James Bond/007 film probably couldn’t have come out at a better time than around now. Why, well, there are so many aspects of this film that seem to be parallel to today’s world. One of the most notable examples is the whole deal of the technology in this film with the Nanobots, the virus that is carried in them, and things like that. That is especially how the technology could be used for wrong purposes, and if special technology like that ends up in the wrong hands. What’s more is that the virus in this film can almost act somewhat similar to COVID-19 in real life. I mean is that not shocking, or what? Anyway, that’s as far as I’ll go on that aspect, as I want to avoid truly spoiling anything. Next, there are the characters of this film. Now, the characters in the other James Bond, for the most part, are really done. It’s even surprising to find that one of them has a backstory. Big plus, wouldn’t you say? Not only that, but James Bond, and Lyutsifer Safin are really excellent hero, and villain respectively. Not only does Daniel Craig do an excellent job as Bond, but Rami Malek as the villain, Lyutsifer Safin, he knows how to play in such a great role. I must say that after playing similar roles in certain adult TV shows a while back, he knows how to play a deliciously cunning, manipulative, and overall evil person. Not to mention a villain that may yet be one of the most complex, and maybe even one of the most memorable of the villains over the course of the James Bond films. Hard to believe, right? Well, if you were to watch the other 24 James Bond movies, followed by watching this one, you’d more than likely be surprised. Another thing to mention about the characters is how one should admire how humble any of them may be even in situations when it may not feel easy to do so. Finally, how could you not like the relationship with James Bond, and Madeleine Swann, even from the previous 007 film? I mean considering Bond has had a tendency to jump from female to female in most of this movie series, that’s certainly a warm welcome especially for the heroic James Bond, wouldn’t you all say? As for the score by Hans Zimmer, he sure knows how to nail it in making a memorable score, whether it be either the animated Lion King, other animated films like The Prince Of Egypt, or The Road To El Dorao, or more adult films like Inception, and 007: No Time To Die. Yeah, 007: No Time To Die is no exception.
Now, all of these sound great, right? However, I must mention that there are a couple areas where this film is docked points. First of all, while most of the characters are likable, and well developed, there were also one, or two that seemed to serve very little purpose. Slow of those could have maybe served more of a role in this film, and sadly didn’t seem to. Why? I’m not sure. The other issue with this film is that it seems to recycle certain elements from other films in which those elements seemed to work better. Because of that, those recycled elements seem to keep this 007 movie at least a little better .
And that’s my review for 007: No Time To Die. For a film that’s supposed to be a grand finale at least for the current actor playing in this film, or the finale of the series, they did a great job of doing that. The movie seems to do a great job of tying up some loose ends, and doing a good job of making an overall good film. Some of the lessons are good, most of the characters, except for one, or two, are well written, especially the main hero, and villain, the score is great, and the story is overall good. If you haven’t seen this film, make sure that you do when you can. You will probably have a really fun time with 007: No Time To Die. Also, see it on the big screen, if you can. This particular one is especially made for theaters, to be sure.
Ladies & gentlemen, I hope everyone here on this blog site, and everywhere else has been doing well! Today, we are going to go into the world of Studio Ghibli, an animated film company that was acquired by John Lasseter back in the mid-2000s, and was no longer part of Disney as of recently, when certain drama occurred between Lasseter, and Disney. As some of you at least on Facebook know, I have watched at least a few Studio Ghibli films already. Well, today, we shall talk about one that I watched last week after hearing so many good things about it. So now, without further ado, let’s talk about a Studio Ghibli film from over 20 years ago called Princess Mononoke.
Plot: When a tyrannical female ruler named Lady Eboshi (Minnie Driver), and her citizens of a place in Japan called Iron Town begin to destroy all of the forests nearby, including an attempt to destroy a very sacred part of the forest, a young warrior named Ashitaka (Billy Crudup), a female warrior named San (Claire Danes), and a pack of wolves, and other creatures try to do whatever they can to stop her. Will Ashitaka and them succeed, or will Eboshi eliminate them, and get her way in the end?
First off, I would like to begin this review by confessing that I remember seeing a poster of this film in the movie section of the newspaper, and being somewhat shocked that this cartoon was rated PG-13. I mean back then, I barely recalled hearing of any animated film being given such a rating. Heck, when the DreamWorks film, The Prince Of Egypt, was first released the year before, I was shocked to see that film being given a PG rating. However, after finally seeing Princess Mononoke for the first time last week, I am honestly not surprised that this film was rated PG-13. In fact, this film is not for kids in the slightest. Sure, there may be one, or two elements, like certain creatively made creatures, that kids might like. Other than that, this film is most definitely for the teen, and adult crowd. I must say that Hiyao Miyazaki, who also directed other Studio Ghibli films like Spirited Away a few years after this film, for instance, does a really good job of combining realism with fantasy. I mean on the one hand, you have character with guns, and things like that, while also having fantasy elements (i.e. magical creatures, and talking animals) thrown into the mix as well. Joe Hisaishi also does a phenomenal job with the score. If I recall correctly, he also composed the score for 1986’s Castle In The Sky. I must say that in movies like that, and this film, he seems to truly understand that music in a movie can help engage the audience. Truth be told, words probably can’t even describe how both beautiful, as well as haunting the music can be at certain points. Next, the world building is very good. I mean from the towns, to the forests, it wouldn’t be surprising if one wouldn’t at least want to go into a forest with special water, and having special friends if he/she were to get transported into this fantastical world? Additionally, need I mention some really amazing action sequences that could have easily been used in a live-action martial arts film? Not to mention that this film itself could have easily been made into live-action. However, it was probably best in this case that this film was animated/anime. The reason being is because back when films like this, and Spirited Away were released, they both seemed to serve as good examples of animated films that could do some things that, more often than not, couldn’t (except in the cases of films like Star Wars, Lord Of The Rings, and Harry Potter, that is). Another thing to like about this film is that even if this film can feel somewhat like Fern Gully, and Avatar, Princess Mononoke also does a good job of being different enough that it doesn’t quite end up being too familiar with movies like those. Finally, Princess Mononoke does a really great job of teaching potentially good lessons about how one should love enemies even when uneasy yo do so, and being willing to do the impossible even when others say that you might be unable to.
While these are all good things, there are a few areas where the film falls. First off, some of the characters, while many of them are likable, there were also others that seemed okay, but not quite as likable as maybe they could be. Not to mention that one, or two characters that were a little confusing at points, especially when they take certain courses of action that one might not expect them to take. Another fault of this movie was that there were a couple plot holes that could have maybe been explained. I remember watching a couple scenes, for example where I found myself wondering why this certain thing ended up happening, or that situation occurred. Finally, the ending, while okay, there are certain aspects of it that could have made it better in the end. Don’t get me wrong, certain aspects of it are good. It just could have maybe been a little more than it ended up being in the end.
And that’s my review for Princess Mononoke. I spite of it having a few faults, it is an overall very enjoyable film. The world building is creative, some of the characters at least are likable, the musical score is fantastic, there are some good lessons to be learned from this film, and it’s a very cool, and mature film. I would say definitely go check it out, and see what you think of it. You may yet find yourself surprised by it.
Alright everyone! Today is the day that we finally conclude the Matrix marathon in preparation for the fourth film in December of this year. The one, and only The Matrix Revolutions!
Plot: As Neo (Keanu Reeves), Trinity (Carrie-Ann Moss), Link (Harold Perrineau), Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburne), and the rest of the Matrix gang must prepare for what will hopefully be the final fight between themselves, and Agent Smith (Hugo Weaving), and the Machines of Machine City, the question remains as to whether Neo, and his crew will free the Matrix of Agent Smith, and his armies, or if Agent Smith, and the Machines will keep the Matrix in bondage forever.
Well, what shall we say about this third installment of The Matrix movie franchise? Well, this film may most likely be the best of the franchise. How on Earth this film got a lower rating on Rotten Tomatoes than the first two films is a mystery to me. All I will say is that The Matrix Revolutions, and it’s “rotten score” is a perfect example of why the general audience shouldn’t always take the word of professional critics, but go into a film like this one with an open mind. First off, there is a really good amount of symbolism scattered throughout this movie, most notably around the beginning, and near the end of this film. As for the the tragic moments, yes there may be more of those here than there seemed to be in the first two films. I mean, I for one, am not a fan of stories that end up being really, really sad at points. Then again, who is? Also, people will most likely be grief-stricken by what sad moments do occur in this movie. However, given the kind of film that this is, as well as the other two films, that’s most likely to be expected, wouldn’t you say? Not to mention that films like Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King, or the seventh/eighth Harry Potter ended up being more sad than their respective previous films, you know? Anyway, despite this Film maybe feeling slightly fast-paced at a couple points, The Matrix Revolutions, for the most part, is great at taking time to help the audience enjoy the suspenseful, and thrilling moments, take time to grieve at any sad moments that occur in this film, or even to savor the rather meaningful, and symbolic moments that occur in this film. Additionally, there are some potentially great messages in this film about being willing to carry on certain tasks no matter what kinds of circumstances may occur in one’s life, as well as having faith, and being hopeful that things will work out for the best in the end. Going along with that is how, just like with the very first Matrix film, there seem to be some really good parallels between this film, and the Bible, along with the whole of learning to have faith in God, no matter what good, or bad things may come out way. So that was a really nice touch. In addition to all of this, there are some rather surprising plot twists that occur over the course of this film. One most notable example is a potentially intriguing one that occurs around the climax of the film. I won’t give away what happens, but let’s just say that you will probably be surprised by how this particular plot twist near the end is handled. One final thing to mention is how the color palettes, visuals, and special effects are used in this movie as well. That is especially when it comes to seeing beautiful colors of the sky, and other aspects in that regard as well.
And that’s my review for The Matrix Revolutions. Even if this film may end up being more sad than the previous two films, the film is overall really enjoyable. I’m somewhat surprised by the fact that a fourth film is coming out in the next month, month and a half, sometime like that. That is considering the way things seemed to conclude here. Still, if the Wachowski Brothers have a good story intended for the upcoming fourth film, then let’s hope they know how to continue this franchise in the best way possible. For now, definitely see The Matrix Revolutions, along with the first, and second films. Not only would you be surprised, and intrigued by how good these stories are, as well as how much good action there is, but also by how much there is to unpack in these films, especially the first, and third films. Well, here’s hoping that anyone who hasn’t seen these films, but desire to will go into these movies with open minds.
Alright, so now, we dive into the second installment of The Matrix trilogy, soon to be four films come December. Interesting that the third part would come out five to six months after this second film, eh? Well, let’s go back to The Matrix again, shall we?
Plot: As Neo (Keanu Reeves), Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss), Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne), and the rest if the crew get closer to likely fulfilling the prophecy told by the Oracle (Gloria Foster) of defeating the villainous machines, will the crew be able to get even one step closer to conquering the evil within their world? Along the way, can people like Neo learn to overcome some fears that he has now had to deal with in his life?
First off, one of the things that The Matrix Reloaded does well with is expanding upon the world of The Matrix. You know like a good sequel is supposed to do. Not only that, but the movie improves on the good things from the first film like with being more thought-provoking at times, having interesting messages, improving on the characters of the first film, as well as the new ones, and making some really interesting action scenes. Also, I’m not sure what kind of technology that they used to make some of the characters computer generated at times. However, whatever it was, the filmmakers did a great job of using that technology to the best of their advantage, particularly when it comes to a couple characters called the Twins. Next, there are some really interesting plot twists in this film. It’s even surprising how some of those twists are handled. Additionally, as mentioned before, the movie does give the audience some things to think about, such as whether or not someone believes something to be true, or whether or not one should believe every prophecy that is told by an Oracle, a prophet, or whoever else. I mean seeing as even the Bible has taught in Scripture like in 1 John 4 how one should not believe every spirit, but to test the spirits, that’s definitely something to take to heart after watching by a movie like this one, you know? Oh, and it’s also good that this film touches on subjects like learning to not fear the future of what could happen, or what may be. Seeing as many of us may have fears, such as losing a loved one, a job if we do something wrong, or anything else of that nature, that’s another thing to ponder, wouldn’t you say? And another thing, how could one not like the sound effects, the special effects, or even the slow motion capture that occurs at different points in this film?
The one thing that I will say is a downside in this film is that there is a point in time, when this film seems to drag for around 5-10 minutes. Not only that, but it drags with there being sex scenes that go on a little too long than it should have, the movie showing people dancing in sexual ways longer than the film should, and things like that. I remember looking away from time to time, and wondering if this point in time in the film is going to end anytime soon. Thankfully, it does, but that part should have ended sooner. Oh well! Okay, I understand that adult films even of this caliber seemed interested in inserting their sex scenes, or potential sexual dance scenes, or what have you. Well, on the brighter side, at least this film doesn’t seem to act as pornographic, or potentially pornographic before, or after that specific 5-10 minutes.
And that’s my review for The Matrix Reloaded. Even though there were one, or two points where it drags, The Matrix Reloaded is overall worth seeing. Once again, it is not surprising as to how enjoyable it is. Both the old, and new characters are great, and the film has some very good subjects innit as well. Well, definitely see this film, along with the first, and possibly even third films. Besides that potentially dragging sexual moment that drags at one point around 5-10 minutes, the Matrix Reloaded is definitely worth seeing.
Ladies & gentlemen, welcome back! Today, we are going to be talking about a science fiction/adventure film that is based on a book series that has spanned apparently over twenty books, something like that. Not only that, but the makers of this film are have seemed to want to create a film in the likes of Star Wars, Lord Of The Rings, or those kinds of films. Not a bad idea! Anyway, based on the novel series of the same name by Frank Herbert, the movie that we are talking about shall be the one, and only Dune.
Plot: Set in the year 10191, a young man named Paul (Timothee Chalamet) , and his parents (Oscar Isaac, and Rebecca Ferguson) live on an ocean planet called Caladan. But one day, they are asked to go to a desert planet called Arrakis, unaware that an evil emperor (Stellan Skarsgard) wants to use this opportunity to stage a coup, and take over the planet for his own personal gain. With the help of some allies, will Paul, and his parents Leto Atreides, and Lady Jessica be able to join the natives of Arrakis protect the planet, and save it from being conquered by Vladimir Barokken, and his evil army once and for all?
Well, I’m sure that just as the movie makers of Lord Of The Rings, or those of the Harry Potter series, or Chronicles Of Narnia movie series were trying to make those as great as possible, the movie makers of this new Dune movie series are trying to do the same. So that raises the question as to whether or not they succeeded in doing so. Well, in more ways than not, they did. However, there does lie a difference between at least this first installment of the Dune movie series, and the Lord Of The Rings, or even Harry Potter, or even the Narnia series. That would be that even if the book series of those are better, the movies do a good job of being nearly as good, or great, as their respective book counterpart versions. As for Dune, at least as far as this first installment of movie version goes, this film does seem to do a mostly good job of sticking as close to the book version as possible. Now, just so you all know in advance, I never read the Dune book series. So what do I know as far as that situation goes? Still, while you watch this film, it’s clear how good that this movie is trying to be, and is for the most part. However, there are a couple ways in this movie version could have maybe been a little better than it was in the end. First of all, some of the secondary characters could have probably been given a bigger role than they seemed to have in the end, especially when it comes to some of those that appeared in the beginning. That brings me to the potentially second issue of this film. That being that somehow, the ending probably could have maybe been extended by maybe an additional 10-15, if not 20 minutes just to get to know some additional characters that appear near the end of this film. Okay, I understand that maybe we get to know some of those characters more in the sequel that’s supposed to come out two years from now. Still, is it too much to ask to get to know some of those characters a little more in this film too? Oh well!
But now, on to the really good stuff. And trust me, there’s a lot to like, no, more like love about this film. First of all, there’s the score by Hans Zimmer. Okay, even though there aren’t songs in this film (which why would there be if this isn’t supposed to be that kind of film), Zimmer shows once again how well he can do with engaging the audience with his music. Because of this, it wouldn’t be surprising if people were to want the soundtrack for this film after seeing it. Whether it be the more quieter moments, or even the most thrilling moments that will most likely keep people on the edge of their seats, the score is bound to be memorable. Next, of course there’s the acting. I mean Oscar Isaac as Paul’s father, or Timothee Chalamet as Paul himself are really good. Even Rebecca Ferguson does great as Paul’s mother, Lady Jessica. Considering that she has mostly played in roles that have involved her being a love interest to a make, or, in the case of 2017’s The Greatest Showman, a potentially seductive female to main character P.T. Barnum, this was a welcome change in roles for her. And of course with Stellan Skarsgard as Vladimir Barokken, he does a great job of playing the human/alien character of this film. The only minor squabble that one may have in regards to the acting portion of this film is that Chalamet as Paul might have made his character a little too serious for a good majority of this film. Oh, and this review probably wouldn’t be the best if I were to fail to mention Zendaya as Paul’s love interest, Chani. Additionally, the world building, especially for the planet Arrakis, is really impressive. In fact, one could argue that the world Arrakis may have possibly been explored a little more than say the desert planet of Tatooine in the Star Wars movie series. Also, how could you not like the jokes, and some of the creatures that reside on Arrakis. Not to mention that when you get to have scenes like our main characters sleeping in compounds at night, it might not be too big of a shock if more people were to want have more opportunities to sleep under the stars more at night, or even sleep in a compound, and hear the sounds of say crickets, or other peaceful noises at night. Another thing to appreciate is how creative this film is when it comes to certain scenes that involve certain characters having to control their desires, needs, or emotions in some of the most creative ways possible. One final thing that’s worth mentioning is how Dune, more often than not, seems to act like a more mature version of a film series like Star Wars. Okay, that might sound a little cliched. Still, when you have a film with a Star Wars feel, but with a more thrilling kind of feel, and likely feeling a little more adult, how could especially the older crowd not appreciate that aspect of this film as well?
And that’s my review for Dune. Even if this film may have felt a little shorter than it should have been, and some of the characters not feeling quite as fleshed out as they should have been, this film is still really fun. It has elements like really great thrilling sequences, potential romance, excellent cinematography, and world building, mostly great characters, a really fun score, and a very well developed story, even if a little too short, despite it’s running time of two hours, and thirty-five minutes. Truthfully, after you watch this film, you’ll most definitely leave wanting to explore more of this world, even come two years from now, when the sequel is supposed to be released. I, for one, am curious to see how well they do with expanding this story, and how well we get to know the characters in future films. Definitely see Dune in theaters, instead of on HBO Max! Dune is most definitely a movie that deserves to be watched on the big screen before possibly being rewatched on video. Plus, Dune, like many films of this caliber, deserves to be watched in theaters in the first place. In all honesty, you’d be surprised by this film in the end, even if the book may be better. Again, go see this film if you haven’t yet. This film is so worth your time.
Ladies & gentlemen, today, we are going to be going back to the world of live-action movie musicals that seemed rather predominant in the 1950s through 1970s, or 1980s, sometime like that. Not only that, but apparently today’s movie musical seems to be one of the most well-known of this genre, as well as has considered by many as one of the best musicals, and films period. Starring Gordon MacRae, Shirley Jones, Charlotte Greenwood, and Rod Steiger to name a few, the movie is, Oklahoma.
Plot: A cowboy named Curly (Gordon MacRae) attempts to ask the love of his life, Laurey Williams (Shirley Jones) to a dance event that is supposed to raise money for a new school house. After he’s waited for so long to do so, however, Laurey reluctantly decides to go with another man (Rod Steiger) that also has his eye on the beautiful dame. With this competition now erupting, can Curly win Laurey back, or will he have to let her go before, or even after that dance event is over?
Alright, so there were a couple reasons that I was very eager to see this particular musical film. One is that I’m hoping to see these live-action movie musicals hopefully sooner rather than later. Second was that I sang the opening song, “Oh What A Beautiful Morning” in one of my high school plays. Not to mention that there was me seeing the movie I Can Only Imagine over the past few years, and watching the scene in that movie where Bart Millard sings that very song. So now that I’ve seen this film, it is time to make my review for this film. Guys, like with many other of these musicals that I’ve seen thus far, I was very, very surprised with this film. First of all, the songs are all really good, from “Oh What A Beautiful Morning,” to “Oklahoma,” “People Will Say We’re In Love,” “Many A New Day,” and songs like those. Even though not all of these may be as memorable on first watch, they’re sure to grow on you once you were to rewatch this film multiple times afterwards. I mean even if one were to be in a school play, or even a show that involved mainly adults, not only would people love reliving the songs of this film, but also playing the parts of any of these memorable characters. That alone should say something, should it not? Oh, and one more thing to say in regards to the music! The music, both the songs, and score alike, do well with capturing the spirit of certain parts of the Old West. Next, the movie does teach some very good lessons. One most notable example is the lesson of how, as a wise person pointed out sometime ago, people are complicated. I mean when we see people make decisions, or maybe not talk to us all that much anymore, it’s natural for us to sit around, and judge them by their actions. This is not the best course of action since, well, none of us, but God, and those specific individuals, knows what exactly they’re going through. A movie like Oklahoma does an excellent job of showing certain situations throughout the film of where something like those could easily be the case. In addition to all of this, one can easily be awestruck by how scary, and suspenseful this film can be at times. I mean from seeing previews of this film, one might think that it’s going to be happy, and lighthearted all the way through. However, that is not always the case with Oklahoma. In fact, there were a few scenes that could maybe frighten younger kids. Oh, even the younger ones will enjoy this film, make no mistake. However, it wouldn’t be surprising if either kids, or even adults were to feel even a little bit nervous, and shocked by certain events, and moments that were to happen in this film. So definitely be prepared for that! Additionally, the characters are very likable, from when they’re singing, to just having dialogue with one another. Still, it’s really the musical numbers that help them get developed over the course of this film. The characters really grow on you as well. Some of them even have really good character arcs, and you really seem to have a very good understanding of where some of them are coming from. However, some of us could probably also agree that there are some good lessons that we could take away from each of their characters, and some of the choices that they make, good, or bad. Oh, and another thing to mention in regards to the characters is that I wouldn’t be surprised if family films like 1991’s Beauty & The Beast drew inspiration from certain characters that were in Oklahoma. Trust me, if you were to watch both films back to back, you would probably know what I mean. One other thing to mention is that the movie makers of this film truly help capture how people in a state like Oklahoma, or even people living in other southern states would talk more often than not. Additionally, how could you not love seeing the scenery of the beautiful farmland, or even the scenes with the school house, and scenes like those? The only potential criticism that one could have with this film is that there were points where some of the side characters made some decisions that weren’t all that great, and also seemed to let other people walk all over them. Not to mention that some of the decisions that they made didn’t seem to make sense all that much. I don’t know, maybe I’m wrong on that, but that was the one intriguing part of this film, for sure.
And that’s my review for 1955’s Oklahoma. Once again, we have a film musical that is really well done for the most part. The fact that this film is almost two, and a half hours long really pays in the end. Could this film have been shorter? Perhaps! Still, I don’t know if elements like the characters, story, or even the songs, for instance would have been as well developed if this film were around an hour, and a half to even around two hours. So yeah, I’d say that making this film around two and a half hours long was a smart move, especially for a film that came out around this time period. Truthfully, I hope that musicals, or maybe even movies period go back to the days when they make movies that around this long, and help their characters move, and breathe more than they have seemed to in recent years. The more you watch movies like this, The Sound Of Music, or even Fiddler On The Roof, the more one will like realize why they were really good in the first place. Oklahomans most definitely no exception. If you haven’t seen this film, definitely do so. You’d be surprised by how much better it is after you watch it. Definitely let me know if you agree, or disagree with me on that!
Ladies and gentlemen, today, we are going to be diving into the sci-fi/fantasy/thriller adult movie franchise that has been really popular among the general public. Not only that, but, after several years of this franchise initially concluding, Warner Bros. decided to make a fourth installment eighteen years after this franchise had officially ended. Well, for some reason, there’s a fourth film coming in December of this year. With that said, let’s start with The Matrix Number 1, starting Keanu Reeves, Lawrence Fishburne, Carrie-Ann Moss, Hugo Weaving, and some other people.
Plot: When a computer hacker named Thomas Anderson, aka Neo (Keanu Reeves) is drawn into a world, known as The Matrix, he must fight besides people like Trinity (Carrie-Ann Moss), and Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburne) as part of a rebellion against machines, and humans that are trying to take over the Matrix, and maybe even the world. Will Neo, and the gang be able to make the right decisions, and do whatever is necessary to conquer the evil in their midst?
HOLY COW!!!! I can definitely see why so many people live these films thus far. First of all, this film is over two hours long. And man, does that running time for The Matrix make it all the more worthwhile. First of all, the characters are all well thought out. They are all likable. Even villains like Agent Smith are really well written. And of course, need I mention how well developed characters like Neo, Morpheus, Trinity are, all with nearly every other character? I mean, as this film continues to progress, it’s almost as if you could find yourself really understanding their motives, and wanting to spend more time with them. In addition to this, the story is surprisingly really thought-provoking. You can easily see things from a Christian perspective, and maybe even other religious perspectives as well. In fact, it wouldn’t be surprising if say a young adult Bible study, or a church youth group, or even other groups in church were to watch either this entire film, or at least bits, and pieces from this film, and draw from this film certain subjects, like learning to make the right decisions, what doors to take in life, and other subjects along those lines. One could also see some really cool symbolisms in this film, like with there being an Oracle character, and other elements that are scattered throughout this film too. Oh, and how could one not like there being Biblical names in this film, like Zion, for instance? And another quick thing to mention! The way that certain symbolisms, and elements are presented is just genius. Another thing to enjoy about this film. Oh man, it is astounding how some of the action is handled. One thing especially to mention is a scene that goes into slow motion, and, well, let’s just say that it is considered memorable by many people when they talk about this film, and maybe even the franchise in general. Honestly, I can see why this scene, which I won’t say how it goes down, is considered a great scene. Don Davis’ score is also brilliantly orchestrated. He knows how to put a score in the right film, and at the right moments. Next, there is the world building in The Matrix. I mean from the ships, the creatures, and of course the streets, and buildings. For a movie that was released around the end of the 1990s, it is impressive how well done the real world, and The Matrix were. Geez! No wonder this film was so successful, as well as spawned a couple sequels, soon to be three sequels. One other thing to mention is that the script seems to be more memorable, and timeless than your typical R-rated film. In fact, even if there are a few F-bombs in this film, those aren’t as constant as many other R-rated films. Besides movies that have been based on actual events in history, like Braveheart, how often have we heard of cuss words, especially the F-bomb, not being used that much in an R-rated movie. Well, all the more reason to appreciate this film. The only thing that could’ve maybe made this film a little better was that there were one, or two plot holes in this film, most notably in regards to one thing that happened around the beginning of this film, as well as something that occurred around the end that may leave the viewer a little confused. Oh well!
And that’s my review for The Matrix. It is a story that is given room to breathe, has great characters, has impressive messages, and has some really good symbolism scattered throughout. And of course, let’s not forget how creative certain elements are presented in this film. Not only that, but you’d be surprised by how well, and thought-provoking The Matrix is. All in all to say, definitely see The Matrix if you haven’t! That is especially if you want to be caught up before December of this year, when the fourth film is released.
Matthew’s Animated & Live-Action Movie Reviews 