Everyone, today, we review a thriller film that was just released earlier this month. Everyone, I give you all my review of the one, and only, Whalefall, starring people like Austin Abrams, and Josh Brolin, among some others.

Plot: Sometime after the mysterious death of his father (Josh Brolin), and returning from first year of college, scuba diver Jay Gardiner (Austin Abrams) sets out to the ocean with scuba diving equipment in order to find out what happened to his father. In the process, however, both he, along withhis scuba equipment, and a giant squid, are swallowed up by a giant sperm whale. Now, with an hour’s worth of oxygen in his scuba diving tank, can Jay somehow find a way to get out of the whale once and for all?

Well, the premise of this film is very interesting for sure. Did Whalefall most likely take some inspiration from say Jonah in the Bible? Well, you got me! Regardless, even if we have had quite a few survival films over the years, one should definitely give the filmmakers credit for coming out with what may yet be one of the more creative ones out there. Yes, we did have Jaws quite a few decades ago. But still, to have a character actually be swallowed into the belly of what was sure an actual whale in this case, yeah, very interesting, if you ask me. What’s more is that even if a lot of the film involves main character Jay being inside a whale, at least we get some flashbacks of some of Jay’s life, be it scenes of conversations between Jay, and his dad, and more. So yeah, at least we get some good character development because of that. Also, the way that the story was handled was surprisingly very creative, and seemed to serve as a great learning tool as well. The characters are also overall really likable, and the acting is phenomenal. The score is also really cool. The movie also does well with not dragging even when it could have easily done so at times. And yes, you got to give the filmmakers props for making a good story in less than two hours. Finally, it was good to learn some rather interesting information from this film as well.

If there were any criticisms to be talked about for this film, they would be that, one, the film could potentially be a little too depressing at times. Second, and finally, there were one, or two plot holes as well.

And that’s my review for Whalefall. Yeah, if you want to see an action thriller film that could most likely be more unique from other films of this genre, then I would highly recommend it. The score is great, the story is very interesting, and you’d like most of the characters. If there was an action thriller film to be excited about, Whalefall is definitely among them. So definitely see it, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9/10

Everyone, today, we review DreamWorks’s first original film since last year’s Dog Man. It is the one, and only, Forgotten Island, starring H.E.R., Liza Soberano, Dave Franco, Jenny Slate, Lea Salonga (whom some of us may know as providing the singing voice of female Disney characters like Jasmine’s in Aladdin, and Mulan’s in Mulan), and a few others. So now, let’s discuss Forgotten Island.

Set in the Philippines, in the 1990s, female friends Jo, and Raissa (H.E.R., and Liza Soberano) are about part company due to Raissa having been accepted to Caltech in America. Because of this, they decide to celebrate their last night together by hanging out on the beach. However, things go awry when an object that they discover on the beach gets them sucked into a world, and island, by the name of Nakalimutan (or Nakali for short, which means “forgotten”), a place where people that go there begin to slowly but surely forget memories of their past. In spite of this can Jo, and Raissa, with the help of new friends, such as Raww (Dave Franco), somehow retain their memories, and get back into the Philippines, while also trying to evade a dangerous creature named Manang (Lea Salonga), a mythical creature called the Manananggal, which is apparently good at stealing the memories of others?

Although DreamWorks’ latest Forgotten Island may not be the studio’s best feature, it still ends up being a fun time nevertheless. First of all, the dynamic with the friendship between Jo, and Raissa, was done really well. It’s probably one of the more realistic ones that an animated film could have. It’s almost like their friendship is one that almost anyone who’s had a good friend, a best friend, you name it, can relate to in one way, or another.

Then, there are the characters themselves, not only are Jo, and Raissa, really great characters, but some of the secondary characters are great like this mythical creature of the Philippines folklore named Batiba, who is of the the mythical species known as the Batibat, Mermahn, who is a merman, Bungi, and more. And, of course, you have the were-Aspen, Raww, who can be both human, and then dog at other times. Yeah, Raww can maybe act a little too cool, and egocentric at times. Still, he is probably the film’s more comedic type, and probably the more memorable character of the secondary characters partly because of that. Well, there’s that, and also because he’s not afraid to admit when he was in the wrong, and goes through a character arc that helps him to attempt to right any wrongs that he has done to others. Oh, and, of course, there’s the villain, Manang. Wow, her design was really cool, first of all. Second, the way she was developed, it was really dark, and scary. Although, her design, and facial features could potentially be a little too dark, and scary for kids. Then again, that’s what helps make a good character, and part of what makes a good story, is it not? I guess there you have it.

Next, of course there’s the animation for this film. Wow, after seeing this film, and the film’s animation, I found myself wondering how cool it must have been for those who saw this film in 3D. Truly, DreamWorks has come a long way with their animation over the past few years, especially once films like the first Bad Guys film, and Puss In Boots: The Last Wish, were just released a few years ago. Whether it’s the ocean, and the waves rolling up to the beach line, the sunset, the nighttime, the designs of the creatures, and, overall, the ability to combine 2D, and 3D animation, it works really well. Honestly, if DreamWorks only attempts a fully 2D animated film again (which may never happen, but one can only dream), one can only imagine how much more cool that animation could be. But hey, at least we can for sure be grateful for the fact that DreamWorks has done well with accomplishing the technique of blending 2D, and 3D animation.

And, of course, the score by Nathan Matthew David was really good. But what’s more is that this film did well with capturing the time period of the 90s. The film doesn’t try to shoehorn in music from say the 2000s, or anything like that. Truly, this film does well with showing the culture of another time period with the music.

Then, there’s the story. Although the story is not always the strongest, it does well with breaking fourth walls in more ways than not. The film ends up having moments that will look like cliches, but will end up having quite a few surprising twists instead. Truly, that is something to appreciate about DreamWorks. DreamWorks has often never been afraid to avoid some tropes that could end up being cliches. Instead, they’ve had this gift of acting more realistic, and, overall, trying to be different from animated films from many other studios. Even when DreamWorks came out with some of their first films like The Prince Of Egypt, or The Road To El Dorado, that has often been the case. The filmmakers did well with accomplishing that with Forgotten Island as well.

Finally, the film does well with teaching good lessons, especially about learning to be happy for others, and also doing some reflection on how one can make his/her future a better one. There’s also good lessons about not being afraid to do what’s right, and being willing to sacrifice your wants, and desires for those of others when need be.

If there were any flaws that this film had, there would be a couple. First of all, this film did end up having some crude moments here and there. Thankfully, not too many, but still. Also, the merman character probably had kind of weird design. Thankfully, it could have been much worse, but still. There were some additional things that didn’t make a whole lot of sense in this film as well. I won’t go into those, but let’s just say that some of them made this film lean a little more on the strange side. Thankfully, the film is still enjoyable overall, but still.

And that’s my review for Forgotten Island. Yeah, even though this film can be a little crude, and lean a little more on the weird side at times, this movie is an overall fun one. The characters are fun, the setting is good, the animation is beautiful, just as great as that of those of films The Bad Guys, and The Wild Robot, and the story, like those in many of DreamWorks’ entries, is very unique from your typical animated film, and maybe even film period. Yes, this film might end up appealing more to teens, and adults than to children. Still, people will more than likely still have a fun time with this film. Definitely see Forgotten Island, if you haven’t yet. You’ll most likely be glad that you did in the end. And hey, you’ll probably be surprised by how much you enjoy it by the end. So, again, see this film, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 8.5/10

Well, everyone, welcome to another episode of Flight Into The World Of Walt Disney Animation Studios & Disney/Pixar! Today, we dive back into Walt Disney Animation Studios for a film that I was originally going to rewatch, and review before it was announced that a certain Disney/Pixar film was reaching it’s 20th anniversary, and was getting a re-release back into theaters as a result. So I am now reviewing this month’s film this month because of that. Anyway, for this month’s film from Disney, we review a Disney animated film that was released back in the late 1990s, when the Disney Renaissance Era that went from 1989-1999 was nearing it’s end. Oh, but that’s not all. Today’s Disney film, Disney’s 36th animated feature in the Walt Disney Animation Studios library, marks a first for quite a few things. It is the first to take place in the continent of Asia, China in this case. It is also the first time in which Eddie Murphy would voice a character before he would go on to voice Donkey in Shrek three years later. What’s more is that Mulan was also the first of three Disney animated films to be made primarily at the former animation studios that was at Hollywood Studios in Orlando, Florida (2002’s Lilo & Stitch, and 2003’s Brother Bear would also be primarily made at this studio as well). Oh, and one more thing I should mention! Tony Bancroft, the director of Disney’s Mulan, was involved with Disney, and helped animated quite a few projects like this one, 1994’s The Lion King, 2003’s Brother Bear, and a few other animated films from Disney before he helped found the Salvation Poem Project, and, along with his brother, Tom, would make the faith-based animated film, Light Of The World (which was just released last year). Everyone, let’s dive into Disney’s 36th animated feature, from 1998, the one, and only Mulan.

Plot: When the Hun army, led by the ruthless Shan Yu (Miguel Ferrer), invade China, the Emperor of China (Pat Morita) orders that one man from all the families of China serve in the Imperial Army. However, because Fa Zhou (Soon-tek Oh), from the Fa family is weak, and unable to fight as easily, his daughter, Mulan (Ming-Na Wen speaking, Lea Salonga singing voice), decides to take his place, disguised as a man. Now, with the help of friends like dragon Mushu (Eddie Murphy), and Cri-Kee (Frank Welker), can Mulan, and the Chinese Army, led by Captain Li Shang (BD Wong), stop Shan Yu, and his army from conquering China once and for all?

Now, after rewatching Disney’s Mulan recently, there are some questions I’d be curious to know about. The main one that I’d like to know is “Why did this film not make quite as much money as say earlier films from most of Disney’s films from the earlier 1990s like Aladdin, and The Lion King”? Also, why were the remaining Disney animated films that followed The Lion King in the remaining 1990s, aside from 1999’s Tarzan, to a degree, less, and less popular, for the most part? Were people up in arms about 1995’s Pocahontas being historically inaccurate in more ways than not? Did some people that saw 1996’s The Hunchback Of Notre Dame feel that that film was too dark that people felt that they couldn’t trust what Disney would come out with in the future? Or did a lot of people feel like 1997’s Hercules was a little too corny, and stupid, and feared that Disney would make their animated films that way? I don’t know, am I the only one who is asking questions like these? Well, whatever the reason, there is probably quite a bit of speculation as to why most of Disney’s films that came out in the remaining 1990s following The Lion King were less popular for the most part. Of course, then again, computer animation was on the rise too, as Disney/Pixar came out with the first Toy Story in 1995, and then would come out with A Bug’s Life in November 1998, just five months after Mulan was released. And let’s remember that people began to love computer animated films to the point where they weren’t giving hand-drawn animated as much as a chance at that point.

But hey, I’m probably getting off track at this point. Is Mulan in fact one of the better Disney films to come out in the 1990s? Well, in more ways than not, yes, very much so. First of all, even if it’s box office results didn’t quite match those of say Beauty & The Beast, or The Lion King, at least it would outgross The Hunchback Of Notre Dame, and Hercules. Anyway, the setup for Mulan is very interesting. Well, the fact that it’s a movie about men going to war against a villainous army, and Disney was able to accomplish a story like that in a kid/family way? Wow, well done there, Disney! Here’s the thing! After rewatching Mulan recently, as well as rewatching Hunchback Of Notre Dame just a couple years ago, I found myself comparing those two in particular not only because of them both being released in the 1990s, but also because they both seem to have similar tones to each of them. I mean, what, with Hunchback, that one was a little too dark, and scary for a Disney animated film. Yes, Mulan had kind of a darker tone too. However, the difference seemed to be that while Mulan had some really moments, at least it had serious moments balanced out with some more lighthearted ones. Yes, Hunchback also had some comedic moments too. It’s just that Mulan seemed to do a better job with the balance of serious moments, and comedy, you know? Anyway, Mulan does have a really cool premise with people going off to fight in war, and the like. And yes, you do have people die, and a villain who, along with his army, are in the shadows more often than not. However, again, at least it’s done in a manner that Disney did well with accomplishing even back then, and, thus, in a way that even kids can sit through, and enjoy this film.

Next, there is the animation! Wow, is Mulan another shiny example of how beautiful animation was especially with films released during the time period of 1989-1999. Not to say that the animation in films after that period weren’t outstanding. Still, I’m just saying! Whether you see water, snow, and even smoke, or fire in this film, it’s amazing how far animation had come even at this point. Also, the way the characters are designed is not only more realistic, but also a very unique from how characters were drawn in many other animated films. I’m not sure why, but the way that characters were drawn in Mulan, Lilo & Stitch, and even Brother Bear, it definitely seems as if the animators that worked at the former animation studio in Orlando, Florida seemed to enjoy drawing characters in a more unique, and authentic style. But maybe that’s just me! Well, you all let me know your thoughts on that!

Then, there are the songs. Jerry Goldsmith does the score for this film. Man, does he not only have a good score for this film, but he definitely knows how to capture the essence of the Chinese culture through his score. Additionally, he knows how to create suspense, create emotions, and more through his score as well. Then, there are the songs by David Zippell, and Matthew Wilder. David Zippell at least scored for Disney’s previous film, Hercules. And for those of us who saw that one, I’m sure many of us can agree that the songs of Hercules were pretty catchy. So, did Zippell end up bringing some of that zaniness to Mulan as well? Well, though Hercules probably had songs that might have been a little more upbeat than Mulan, Zippell, and Wilder did create songs that were fairly memorable. I mean “Reflection”, definitely a good one. Same with “A Girl Worth Fighting For”! But it’s really “I’ll Make A Man Out Of You” that seems to be the most memorable of them all. It’s fun, catchy, upbeat, and certainly one that you could probably listen to, or possibly even sing when you’re on a bike ride, working out, or just getting ready for the day. Yeah when a song works that well, that’s saying something, wouldn’t you say? As for “Honor To Us All”, it was an alright song, but the other three were probably the more memorable ones.

The story was also really good. It’s also probably more unique than your typical Disney film. Sure, you have things like the main character wanting more in life, having animal sidekicks, and such. Still, the setup, and the experiences that Mulan has to go through, it helps make this film very enjoyable for kids, but those elements also are handled in very mature ways to where even teens, and adults would definitely enjoy this film too. Because of that, yes, it’s great that this film grossed $120 million domestically. Still, Mulan is one of those films that probably should have made more than that, maybe between $150-200 million, if not more. I mean the animation, the action sequences, or even the comedy, especially provided by the dragon, Mushu, who’s voiced by none other than Eddie Murphy, the score, and the moments that make this film more mature, definitely make Mulan worthwhile. Truth be told, Mulan is a Disney animated film that could have just as easily been live-action before live-action remakes became a thing for Disney. Yeah, if that can be said, also very telling! Oh, and one other thing! How could we not appreciate how well Mulan does with showing what the Chinese culture is like?

Then, there are the characters! They are really likable too. From General Shang to the Emperor Of China (who was voiced by Pat Morita, who also played the memorable Mr. Miyagi in the Karate Kid films that that character was in), to the villain Shan Yu, as well as sidekicks like Cri-Kee, and Mushu, to Mulan herself, there will be something that people will enjoy about them. So if you want a film with likable characters, then all the more reason to see this film, if you haven’t. Plus, how could you especially not love Mushu, especially with him being played by Eddie Murphy. Murphy did well with bringing his comedic flare to this character. Great job, Murphy, especially since he would do the same with voicing Donkey in Shrek three years later. But, more importantly, there’s Mulan herself. Truth be told, with characters like her, much like Aladdin from Aladdin, and Tiana from The Princess & The Frog, for example, Mulan is a great example of a character that people of all ages could learn from. Mulan is not afraid to take risks, she will take the place of people like her father in situations that require it, and even if it means risking her life, she’ll admit when she did things for the right, or wrong reasons, and is overall not afraid to be true to herself, and/or be herself. Hmm! Interesting that Aladdin came out just a few years earlier, and had to learn similar lessons, eh? However, the difference here is that Mulan had to learn to be herself, and be a character that would grow for different reasons.

Finally, Mulan ends up teaching some very family-oriented, but also mature lessons. From learning to be humble, to being caring, making sacrifices when necessary, there is much to take away from Mulan. Plus, the whole thing about learning to do things for more selfless reasons rather than selfish ones, those are great lessons to take away from this film, and help make Mulan all the more enjoyable as a result.

And that’s my review for Disney’s Mulan. Yeah, watching Mulan again for the first time in a long while, I was a little more surprised as to why this is a really great Disney film. This film does well with balancing out memorable, and likable characters, mostly good songs, a surprisingly mature story that accomplishes being handled in a kid/family-oriented way, and more. Personally, as far as at least Disney films from the 1990s go, I would say that I’d rather be on adventures with Mulan a little more than on ones with say Aladdin, and Belle. Now, I will say that I enjoy adventures with Simba of the bunch, but I’m just saying, other than that, Mulan is definitely one worthwhile all the more. It’s just a shame that Mulan most likely isn’t as quite well known as Disney’s other animated films. If it isn’t, then it should be. Truth be told, if you want to see Disney take a film a more mature route, while balancing that out with fun songs, beautiful animation, fun characters, good comedy, and more, then all the more reason that Mulan is a must see. So definitely see Mulan, and see what you think! And hey, at least there would be one more Disney film in the Disney Renaissance period after this with Tarzan, and that would perform even better at the box office than Mulan did.

Final Rating: 9.5/10

Everyone, today, we review a faith-based film that is evaded one of many historical events recorded in the Bible? Starring Mena Massoud, Elijah Alexander, and more, let’s discuss Daniel & The Fiery Furnace! Hmm, side note, interesting that Mena Massoud goes from starring as Aladdin in the Disney remake of Aladdin to playing one of the Biblical figures in this film, eh? Anyway, let’s begin now!

Plot: The movie takes place during the Babylonian captivity, when the citizens of Jerusalem, including Daniel (Mena Massoud), were taken captive by King Nebuchadnezzar (Elijah Alexander) into captivity in Babylon, and were forced to live there for the next seventy years, and the beginnings of that time period.

Well, what can I say? Daniel, & The Fiery Furnace is definitely an interesting adaptation of the Book of Daniel in the Bible. First of all, this film does not shy away from the harshness of this particular time period in recorded Biblical history. Whether this film portrays events like the Babylonian captivity, the fiery furnace incident, and more, Daniel & The Fiery Furnace, and more, this movie most definitely does a great job of showing events like these. Because of this, this film is a very good, and faithful adaptation of Daniel. Plus, especially for those of you that are familiar with the Christian music genre, particularly those artists, and groups that have performed on Christian stations like K-Love either currently, or in the distant past, how could you not like the fact that people like Michael W. Smith helped produce this film? Man, did he, and the other filmmakers do such a good job. What’s even more is that the way that Daniel, his friends Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah (aka Shadrach, Meshach, and Abendego), King Nebuchadnezzar, and the other core figures are handled is done well too. Plus, the way that the story is set up is most likely interesting, and unique from other adaptations of the Book of Daniel. I mean it’s not afraid to show the violence that occurred, the harshness of life before, and during the Babylonian captivity, or things of that nature. It also did well with showing how God remained faithful to Daniel, and his friends, and served as a reminder of how God is faithful because of that. The score is also really great. It was also appropriate that this film was given a PG-13 rating. One other thing to mention is that this film does remain faithful to Book Of Daniel.

Even so, this adaptation of Daniel might take one too many creative liberties. Okay, I’m not saying that I’m against film adaptations taking creative liberties particularly for an account of the Bible. In fact, that worked well for films like The Ten Commandments, The Prince Of Egypt, Joseph: King Of Dreams, the adaptation of Samson from the 1940s, and films like those. Still, in this case, the filmmakers might have stretched it a little much when it came to taking creative liberties. I mean sure maybe if the filmmakers were probably more interested in having certain portions of the Bible come to life, then that’s cool. Still, was it much to ask for maybe a little epilogue in regard to certain other portions of this portion of Scripture? I don’t maybe that’s just me, but I wouldn’t be surprised if others that have seen this film might have felt the same way as well. Finally, there were some scenes that might have most likely been a little too inaccurate at times as well.

And that’s my review for Daniel & The Fiery Furnace. It is definitely a good adaptation if you want to see a newer adaption of the Book Of Daniel. Though it might not be one of the best film adaptations out there, it is still worth seeing for what it is. Definitely see Daniel & The Fiery Furnace because of that. However, if you have yet to also read the Book Of Daniel as well, be ready to become more curious about what happens after this particular film ends at a certain point.

Final Rating: 9/10

Well, everyone, today, we review an action thriller that I just learned about just last year. How ironic, considering this particular evidently reached its 30th anniversary last year, eh? Anyway, with all that said, let’s dive into Beyond Rangoon, starring Patricia Arquette as the main character.

Plot: In 1988, Doctor Laura Bowman (Patricia Arquette), and her tour group are on a trip to Burma shortly after her husband, and son are murdered. After a series of events cause Laura to misplace her passport, and unable to leave the country with her party, she becomes friends with tour guide U Aung Ko, and gets caught up in an anti-government protest that causes, her, and Ko, to be on the run from the Burmese government. Now, with the help of some anti-government protesters, can they escape the dangers, and protests, that occur along the way, and escape Burma once, and for all?

Alright, so part of what me interested in seeing this film recently was discovering a little while ago that an instrumental piece from this film was featured in the theatrical trailers for Mulan back in 1998. Okay, maybe not the best reason, but whatever! Anyway, after seeing this film, is it good? Well, in more ways than not, yes. First of all, the score by Hans Zimmer is really good. Sure, it might feel a little repetitive at times. Still, overall, it was really great. As for the characters, even though not all of them are quite as fleshed out as they could have been, they are still very good. Really, it’s Laura Bowman, and U Aung Ko, that seem to be the most developed of the bunch. Plus, there are some lessons of love, caring, and compassion, that the characters can remind us of in this movie. There’s also some really intense action in this film as well. Some of the most intense action sequences would most likely come from the climax in this film. I won’t give away the reason why. However, let’s just say that the climax is probably one of the most memorable moments in this film. What’s more is that there are some really brilliant lines that consist of some of the most memorable conversations that occur between some of the characters in this film. Which, that finally leads me to the last pro of this film, that there are some additional valuable lessons about not giving up on life, that are contained in Beyond Rangoon.

But is this film perfect? Not fully! First of all, some of the beginning felt a little fast paced. Not to mention that the ending of the film probably occurred a little too soon. Yes, some of the middle of the film might have been a little fast-paced too. Still, it was probably the beginning, and ending of the movie, that likely felt a little rushed. Because of this, some of the characters, aside from the main ones, aren’t quite as fleshed out as they most likely could have been. Finally, some of the instrumental pieces that are incorporated in this film most likely might not have been the best placements in this movie. Somehow, they could have maybe been placed in a better spot, or not been placed at certain moments at all. You got me.

And that’s my review for Beyond Rangoon. Though it’s probably not quite one of the best action thrillers out there, there’s still plenty to like about it. Whether it’s the score, when put in good spots in the movie, clever lines, and lessons to take away, there’s a lot to enjoy about it. If you haven’t seen Beyond Rangoon, then definitely see it. You’ll be surprised more often than not, I’m sure.

Final Rating: 8.5/10

Hi, everyone! Welcome back to another session of movie reviewing, as well as another episode for this month for Flight Into The World Of Walt Disney Animation Studios & Disney/Pixar! Today, we have a change of plans, as we review an animated film that I didn’t originally plan to review until maybe a couple years from now. However, because it was announced that this animated film was getting re-released for its 20th anniversary, it seemed like a better idea to just go ahead, and review this film now. So now, without further ado, let’s dive into Disney/Pixar’s 7th animated feature, from 2006, the one, and only, Cars.

Plot: Hot rod Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson) loves the high life, winning races, awards called Piston Cups, and more. But when an incident causes him to land in a small town called Radiator Springs, and having to fix a broken road, he meets new friends along the way, including Mater (Larry The Cable Guy), Doc Hudson (Paul Newman), and Sally (Bonnie Hunt). Now that he’s having to learn to fix things, and be more dependent on others, can McQueen learn some valuable lessons along the way?

Well, I would like to start off this review by saying that this was a very creative film. I mean to have the characters all be talking cars, yeah, definitely rather creative, wouldn’t you say? Not to mention that especially during the summer of 2006, when this film was released, we had other car-themed movies like Fast & The Furious: Tokyo Drift, and Talladega Knights as well. Anyway, seeing As John Lasseter directed both this Disney/Pixar film, and Toy Story 1 over a decade before, the direction that he took films like these served as proof that Lasseter knew how to make a creative story. Yeah, such a shame that he no longer is head of both Disney/Pixar, and Walt Disney Animation Studios, due to him making choices that weren’t exactly the best.

Anyway, though the story may be a simple one, it also ends up incorporating complexity in it as well. I mean you have a hot shot, who can start not so likable, kind of like Kuzco from Emperor’s New Groove, or Ricky Bobby from Talladega Knights, but, like characters such as them, becomes more kind, and humble through a series of difficult circumstances. I mean yes, a lot of people, especially Christians, have seemed to say that both Inside Out, and it’s sequel, seemed to have a great plenty of things in their films that can be taken from a Christian perspective. Well, the same could, and still can be said at least of Cars 1, if not Cars 2, and 3, as well. Truly, there are a great plenty of things to take away from Disney/Pixar’s Cars. Although kids might mainly love this film for there being cars that talk, the comedy, and the like, teens, and adults will probably enjoy this film not only for those aspects, but also for Lightning McQueen’s character growth, the humility that he develops throughout the film, as well as lessons about humility, learning to not rush in life, and the reminder about putting the needs of others above your own more often than not.

Additionally, there’s the animation. Wow, over the course of the 2000s especially, this film is a prime example of how animators knew how to make more crisp animation. Yes, CGI looked a little more dated with 3D animated films like Toy Story 1, and A Bug’s Life, for instance. Well, overtime, with releases like 2003’s Finding Nemo, or Cars, animation proved to come a long way slowly but surely even then. Even the backgrounds, be it the desert, the racetracks, waterfalls, and more, are spectacular to look at. How about that!?!

The characters, in addition to Lightning McQueen, are also great too. From Sally, to love interest of McQueen, to Doc Hudson, who’s one of the more sage wise characters in this movie, to even Mater, who’s voiced by comedian Larry The Cable Guy, are all memorable too. Honestly, it’s because of characters like them that help make this Disney/Pixar film all the more memorable.

As for the humor, though there are one, or two crude jokes in this animated film, they will most likely fly over the heads of kids. Plus, there is one crude joke that works in probably the most clever way possible.

Finally, there’s the music, and score, by Randy Newman. First of all, how could we not appreciate the songs that help fit the tone, and mood of this film? Plus, in any animated film that Randy Newman has scored in, he’s seemed to have calm, and peaceful serenity with his music. This film is no exception.

And that’s my review for 2006’s Cars. Yeah, rewatching this Disney/Pixar film again twenty years later, it’s most likely better than I remembered. Truthfully, though adults, and teens are more likely to take some lessons away from this film than kids, hopefully kids will take away some valuable lessons after seeing this film too. Cars is one of those must sees. It’s fun, creative, has a beautiful score, wonderful animation, and incorporates some valuable lessons. That being said, should this film have won the Oscar instead of Happy Feet (which came out five months after this film)? Well, I still have yet to rewatch Happy Feet to say for sure. Honestly, from what I remember of both films, Happy Feet was good too, and I’m sure deserved the Oscar. Even so, had Happy Feet not won the Oscar, Cars would have probably deserved it to be sure. Anyway, because of what great quality elements Cars, definitely see it whenever you can. I can guarantee that you’d be pleasantly surprised.

Final Rating: 10/10

Well, everyone, today, we review the newest Spider-Man movie that was just released at the end of July. It is the sequel to 2021’s Spider-Man: No Way Home, and once again stars Tom Holland, Zendaya, and introduces some newer cast members. Everyone, here is my review of Spider-Man: Brand New Day.

Plot: Over the course of four years following the events of Spider-Man: Brand New Day, Spider-Man has had to battle villains like Scorpion (Michael Mando), as well as has to face what may be one of New York’s biggest threats yet that starts to control people across the city by putting a mind spell on them. Can Spider-Man (Tom Holland) put an end to this threat once and for all?

Well, first of all, this film is a mostly really well done film. First of all, there is plenty of heart to this film. There is comedy, there is emotion, comedy, and so much more. And what’s even more is that the characters are very well written. This especially seems to be the case for characters like Spider-Man, Mary Jane Watson, and even Jean Gray in particular. Also, how can you not love how this film has so many great elements that make a great film. Whether that be mostly great character development, a very well developed story, a really brilliant script, some well choreographed action scenes, and so much more? Not to mention some plot twists that occur, betrayals, and other elements too. Also, the way that Spider-Man is handled this time around, one would likely be surprised by well-handled that is. Oh, and to have Michael Giacchino at the helm for composing the score for this film, man that makes this film even better too. What’s even more is that Spider-Man: Brand New Day seems to be a little more unique than most other Spider-Man films that were released before it. For reasons such as these, it is understandable as to why this film has performed as well as it has at the box-office even up to this point. There are also some really cool camera shots too. As I watched this film, I was somewhat perplexed by some of the camera shots that they were able to pull off. In addition to all of this, the movie does a great job serving as a reminder on how not all things in life are black, and white, but that there are some things in life that are sometimes gray. Finally, it was, overall, really great to see Spider-Man grow as a character, especially being more humble this time around.

But does this film have flaws? Unfortunately, yes, it does. First of all, the film does seem to drag from time to time. One of the ways that seems to be the case is in how there might be one too many slow shots. Yes, there were some slow shots that were really great. Still, there were others that seemed to drag the film down a bit. Also, the movie may have most likely crammed a little too much in at times. Thankfully, it could have been a whole lot worse, to be sure, but still.

And that’s my review for Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Yeah, it may have made a tons of money at the box-office, partly due to it being a Spider-Man film. However, the movie may have done so for more reasons than that, partly such as the movie having a more unique tone to it, there being character growth with many of the characters in this installment, and reasons like those. Because of that, Spider-Man: Brand New Day is most definitely worthwhile. Despite a couple flaws, this installment is really well done for the most part. So if you still have yet to see it, definitely make a point to. In the end, you’ll likely be glad that you did.

Final Rating: 9/10

Well, everyone, at this point, we are ten reviews away from me reaching the milestone of Movie Review # 800. How about that!?! Well, in the meantime, for this month’s episode of Flight Into The World Of Walt Disney Animation Studios, we review one of Disney’s older films that was released while Walt Disney himself was still alive. That is when newer animated films from this studio weren’t released quite nearly as frequently as they are nowadays. What’s even more is that today’s Disney film that we talk about was released almost twenty after Walt Disney Animation Studios (formerly known as Walt Disney Productions, and Walt Disney Pictures) released it’s very first animated film, Snow White & The Seven Dwarfs, in 1937. Well, it is also an animated film that, if I’m not mistaken, was very unique, and different, from other animated films that Disney released at the time. With all that said, for this month’s episode of my newer segment, let’s dive into Disney’s 15th animated feature, from 1955, the one, and only, Lady & The Tramp.

Plot: Lady (Barbara Luddy), a cocker spaniel, grows up being raised by her owners, Jim Dear (Lee Millar), and Darling (Peggy Lee). Sometime after she matures, circumstances cause her to meet a stray named Tramp (Larry Roberts). As she, and Tramp grow close to each other, the question remains, will Lady want to leave the life of a house dog, or will Tramp be open to the idea of being a house dog with Lady?

Well, first of all, I will say that though I watched many of Disney’s animated films growing up, I did not watch ones like Lady & The Tramp, Snow White & The Seven Dwarfs, or Sleeping Beauty, quite nearly as much as Disney films from Oliver & Company, or Little Mermaid, and those that followed them. However, as far as the older ones went, I was most definitely glad that I watched, or rewatched them even a few times as a kid.

So, watching Lady & The Tramp again, does this film still hold up? Well, though it may not be perfect by any means, it is still understandable as to why this Disney film is still considered iconic even to this day. First of all, there’s the animation. Okay, yes, we all know that companies like Disney, and other animation companies, have progressed with animation overtime. Still, when it comes to animation especially in older Disney animated films like Lady & The Tramp, 101 Dalmatians, or Robin Hood, for instance, there’s something about the animation in older films that seems to give a warm nostalgic feeling even years later. Honestly, one could argue that even back in the 1950s, if not before, it would seem as if animation was starting to progress even slowly, but surely.

Next, there are the characters. First of all, Lady, and Tramp are very likable characters. Despite coming from different backgrounds, their relationship is still very well developed. Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not one of those that believes that a girl falling for the bad boy is necessarily a good thing. Still, seeing as Tramp does live on the streets, at least you can tell that much like Disney characters such as Aladdin, you can tell that he still has a heart of gold. Yes, he did make some choices that weren’t exactly the best ones, as we learn at one point during the movie. Anyway, Lady is also a great character who does well with standing strong, and not having to be the damsel in distress type. Then, there’s also side characters such as Jock, and Trusty, and any other side characters that are either on the screen more, or even for a very short time. Regardless, any of the side characters, be it them, any of the dogs at a dog pound, you name it, were all fun. It also seemed unique that there was no real villain in this film. Sure, characters like the Siamese cats, or the rat, are the closest thing that we got to that. However, they seemed more like obstacles for the main characters especially than anything else.

In addition to all of this, how could one not like a certain iconic scene that involved Lady, Tramp, and spaghetti. Now, for those of you on here that surprisingly have never seen this film, I won’t say how this scene goes down. However, let’s just say that it’s a scene that you might consider one of your favorites of this film, like it has been for many, if I’m not mistaken.

Then, there are the songs. Though they may not all be entirely memorable, how could one not appreciate catchy ones like “Bella Notte”, or “He’s A Tramp”? Those two especially may be the biggest standouts among the rest of the songs in this film.

It was also great for this film to take place during the time period that it did, which was apparently around the 1900s. Honestly, seeing a big difference in how much more simple life was during this time period compared to today, yeah, there’s definitely no comparison. I mean hardly any technology, more people, and animals walking around, even though there were cars even back then, and more, this is one of those movies that kind of makes you imagine living life back in those times, you know?

Finally, how could one not appreciate good messages from this film such as learning to care about others, learning to see things from another’s point of view, and other messages similar to those?

Now, while these are all great things, this movie does fall short in a couple ways. First of all, the music in this film, aside from the couple standouts that I mentioned before, isn’t likely going to be all that memorable. They’re okay. They just aren’t ones that you’ll probably singing along to, and/or humming to after rewatching this film, or watching it for the very first time. Additionally, there is this sad scene at the dog pound that probably drags, and lasts a little too long. I mean, sure, I think I may understand that the filmmakers were probably just trying to show kids especially how rough life at the dog pound is for a dog. Still, did this scene need to last as long as it did? Just a thought there!

And that’s my review for Disney’s Lady & The Tramp. Aside from a couple flaws in this Disney animated film, it is most definitely understandable as to why Lady & The Tramp is considered a classic in the Disney animated library. The characters are memorable, a couple of the songs are for sure memorable, most of the characters are also memorable, the animation still holds up even today, and there’s plenty more to enjoy about this Disney film as well. Truly, it you still have yet to see Lady & The Tramp, it is one worth seeing, especially if you want a film with iconic moments, if you’re either a dog lover, or animal lover period, would appreciate older films, are an animation, or any other category that you find yourself in that would make you enjoy films like this one. So yes, definitely see Lady & The Tramp if you still have yet to, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9/10

Everyone, today, we review the latest film to be released by Angel Studios around the 4th of July. Wow, and what a great time for it too, since this year is the 250th anniversary of our nation, eh? Anyway, let’s discuss the one, and only Young Washington.

Plot: The film recounts George Washington, and his younger years, and the events that led to him being the first President of the U.S., and even before he, and a few others signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Well, what a great film! Young Washington may be one of Angel Studios’ better films, aside from either shows like The Chosen, or any films based on events of the Bible that have been made by the studio. For one, in many biopics of George Washington’s life, they usually show George Washington as a general, him as President, or things like that. Not quite as much this time around. This time, we get to see George Washington in his younger years, and him growing up before significant events that would occur for him later in his life. This film was still not afraid to portray battles the way they happened, when characters made mistakes, or things like that. In addition to George Washington, the other characters were really great. I will say it was very interesting to learn of the people, and friendships that George Washington came across, and made in his life, especially his earlier years. In addition to all of this, this film has a brilliant script. There are quite a few lines from this film. I found myself leaving the theater trying to have remember certain lines, and moments from this film. It won’t be surprising if that ends up being the case for quite a few other people who see the this film as well. Because of this, there are quite a few lessons to take away from Young Washington. And yes, there are many memorable moments throughout this film as well. Finally, how could we not appreciate the fact that this film was released on the 250th anniversary of America? Seeing as George Washington was one of the people that signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776, how could one not appreciate this film even more, you know?

And that’s my review for Young Washington. The acting is great, the action is really great, and there are really great lessons to learn from this film. It’s too bad that this film may not be as popular as a lot of other films that are out right now. Hopefully, more people will give this film, and others from Angel Studios a chance sooner rather than later. Well, if you like history, are interested in learning more about George Washington, and more, then all the more reason that I would highly recommend that you see Young Washington, and see what you think!

Everyone, today, we review an epic film that was just released earlier this month. It stars people like Matt Damon, Anne Hathaway, Tom Holland, and more. Oh, and did I forget that it’s directed by Christopher Nolan, the same guy that directed The Dark Knight trilogy, 2014’s Interstellar, 2020’s Tenet, 2023’s Oppenheimer, and more? Well, today, we review his latest film that he just directed, and is based off a certain Greek poem by classic author Homer. Yes, that’s correct! Ladies, and gentlemen, I give you all my review of the one, and only, The Odyssey.

Plot: Twenty years have passed since the Trojan War occurred, and Odysseus (Matt Damon), former King of Ithaca, has gone missing. His Queen, Penelope (Anne Hathaway), continues to reject many suitors that seek her hand in marriage, and the throne, including a suitor named Antonous (Robert Pattinson), in hopes that Odysseus may still be out there. Her son, Prince Telemachus, remains hopeful too. Now, will mother, and son’s hope remain true? Will Odysseus return to Ithaca if he is still out there?

Okay, just a heads up, I’m not going to go into the controversy surrounding Elliott Page, the casting choices that some people disagreed with, or anything like that of the sort. I will just talk about the story, the acting, and things like that. Honestly, though The Odyssey is not quite perfect, it is still a good film.

First of all, for the negatives. Well, there there is a great plenty of action in this film, some of them felt a little rushed. There did not end up being quite as much depth, and substance when it came to some of the fighting films. And yeah, there were may have been a couple scenes that might have been a little inappropriate. Thankfully, this film was given the R-rating, but still.

But now, let’s talk about the elements that do make this film really great, because, trust me, there are plenty. First of all, the score hypes this film by a lot. Ludwig Goransson performs the score for this film. Let me tell you, whether it be the action scenes, the times where the film slows down to develop it’s characters like King Odysseus, Queen Penelope, Prince Telemachus, and others, develop the story overall, the climax, you name it, the score is really great. Now could one see The Odyssey winning either a Golden Globe, or even an Oscar for such a reason? I’m not sure I would go that far. Still, the score is one aspect that makes this film worthwhile. There is also great depth to the characters, especially the main ones. Seeing as it’s been years since I last read the novel The Odyssey, I’m not going to talk about how much changed, or didn’t change when adapting from the book to this film version. Well, however much did change, they were probably okay changes more often than not. Probably one of the bigger highlights this time around is how there is probably more depth to the character of Odysseus this time around? Yeah, hard to believe? Well, all the more reason to see this film, and you may likely know what I mean, especially when it comes around the middle to the end of the film. Oh, and that reminds me, speaking of changes, there are some liberties that a lot of people will probably find themselves liking this time around. Then, there’s the acting. Wow, the acting was phenomenal, especially Matt Damon as King Odysseus, Anne Hathaway playing Queen Penelope, Tom Holland as Prince Telemachus, Zendaya as Athena, Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy, along with her twin sister, Clytemnestra, and even Robert Pattinson playing Antinous, one of the suitors for Queen Penelope, to name a few. John Leguizamo even plays a swineherd named Eumaeus, who is blind, and is a faithful slave of Odysseus. Honestly, Leguizamo seemed to know how to add his personality to that character, because he was probably one of the more interesting side characters for this film. I mean he had his comedic moments, but also knew how to pass on wisdom to others, be it to Odysseus, Prince Telemachus, you name it. Also, especially for the character being blind, he surprisingly knows how to be clever from time to time. And yes, the characters of Odysseus, Penelope, and the rest of the characters were really great, and well developed too. I mean one thing to like especially of Odysseus, is that, despite any hardships that he continues to go through in battles, sea storms, and more, he is still willing to endure in trying to make it back home. A similar thing can be said about his Queen, Penelope, is that she’s willing to set boundaries, stand up for herself, and not let herself be wishy washy, so to speak. Prince Telemachus is also memorable for qualities such as being willing to fight when need be, and being willing to protect people like his mother, or anyone else in the kingdom of Ithaca when he has to as well. The structure of the story is also more often than not well structured, aside from some scenes, like action ones, feeling a little rushed. One other thing to mention is that the climax is one of the major highlights, if not the major one, for this film. Again, won’t spoil what happens. However, when it gets to the climax, you’ll most certainly be surprised how great it is, and is one factor that will make you glad that you decided to see this film. Finally, The Odyssey teaches some great lessons about being willing to stay courageous, holding out to hope, having the patience to endure hardships, and more.

And that’s my review for The Odyssey. Yeah, I would say that in spite of the couple flaws this film has, along with any controversies surrounding the film, this is one that is worth seeing, especially if you’re an adult, and read The Odyssey, and enjoyed the story. If you enjoy great epic stories, like great actors for a film like this, are in for a goody story, and more, then The Odyssey is most definitely worth your time. I can guarantee you’ll like, if not love, this film in the end. So yeah, definitely see The Odyssey, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9/10