Everyone, today, we review the latest animated film from Columbia Pictures, and Sony Pictures Animation. It is the one, and only Goat, which stars Caleb McLaughlin, Gabrielle Union, and other stars. So here we go!

Plot: In a world of anthropomorphic animals, a young American Pygmy goat named Will Harris (Luke Cimity as young Will, and Caleb McLaughlin as teenage Will) dreams of becoming a basketball player like his idol, an all-star player, and a black panther, named Jett Fillmore. Will gets his chance when a female warthog named Flo (Jenifer Lewis) comes into a diner that he works at, and he agrees to let her sign him onto a professional basketball team called the Thorns, a team that consists of Jett Fillmore, an ostrich named Olivia Burke (Nicola Coughlan), an Indian rhinoceros named Archie Everhardt (David Harbour), a Komodo Dragon named Modo Olachenko (Nick Kroll), and a giraffe named Lenny Williamson (Stephen Curry), with a proboscis monkey named Dennis Cooper (Patton Oswalt) as the team’s coach. Now, with hard work, and determination, Will Will, and the team be able to beat any, and/or every basketball team that they match in, including a team that consists of a strong horse named Mane (Aaron Pierre), who is MVP in basketball, who is Will’s rival, and has a team of bigger, and likely stronger animal players?

So, with a newer animated film that has the comic book animation style that both Spiderverse movies had, did this film prove that the company that this animated film was made by can make more good films with this animation style than just any Spiderverse movie that had either come out in the past, or may come out in the future? Well, I’m delighted to tell you all that yes, Goat did in fact prove that. I mean on the surface, this film may appear to look like another typical underdog story. However, Goat ends up being more than that in this case. First of all, Goat has a really creative premise with animals, a cool looking world overall, and more.

What’s more is that the animation is really cool. Again, like with the Spiderverse movies, the animation has a comic book style type, and the animation is really great. From the way that the characters move, to any action scenes that involves the characters playing basketball on the court, you name it, Goat does well with expressing emotion even through animation.

Next, there are the characters. With the amount of characters that there are in this film, I was a little nervous as to whether or not they would do well with developing them well, especially the supporting ones. To one’s surprise, though it’s really characters like Will, and Jett, that seem to get the most development, the other characters successfully also stand out as well. Seeing as the others can come off as stereotypes from any trailers of this movie that were shown prior to this film’s release, it just shows as to why people should be careful about judging a movie by it’s trailer, especially wrongfully so. From characters like the comedic Komodo Dragon, Modo, to the anxious ostrich Olivia, and to even the black panther Jett, who can come off as aggressive, but deep down as a softer side to her character, each of these characters have unique personality traits, and, as a result, end up standing out to one degree, or another. What’s even more is how Will ends up having such a great support system surrounding him, be it ones like his late mom, Louise Harris (who is played by Jennifer Hudson), his coworkers at his diner, you name it. Honestly, it’s for reasons such as these that helps make this film all the more enjoyable.

In addition to all of this, the world building is also really great, from having an icy basketball court, another court that has lava underneath the ground, and other really creative basketball courts to go along with this film. In some ways, some of the animation might make scenes like these look like those coming out of a video game, but with better graphics. Could that be partly because of the animation style that this movie has? Yeah, more than likely.

Now, there’s the storyline. Yes, as mentioned earlier, Goat, especially from trailers that marketed this film, may come off as your typical underdog movie. However, in the end, this movie ends up being much more unique in that regard. On top of great animation, and really likable characters, Goat also does well with crafting a film with really fun storytelling. Yes, this film is technically a kid’s/family, due to there being talking animals, this movie being animated, you name it. However, though that may be the case, this film, in some ways, also can feel like its target audience might as well be geared more for teens, and adults as well. Truth be told, had it not been for the premise having talking animals, rather than humans, this film probably could have been a live-action film, and had a more full-on adult feel period. There are also times when the movie seems to take some rather interesting turns that could come off as either twists, or possibly even predictable, maybe a little bit of both. Oh, and did I forget to mention that the script is really great, full of lines that are heartwarming, hilarious, and have other kinds of great lines that help make this film all the more fun to see? What’s even more is that this film hardly drags much, if at all. Finally, it was also great to have great messages about not giving up, persevering to the end, being selfless, instead of selfish, and even an underlying message about not being afraid to face your giants in life, and other messages like those. Honestly, Goat could potentially serve as a great allegorical film especially for messages such as those that are incorporated into this film.

And that’s my review for the new animated film, Goat. With all that I said does this film have a chance of being nominated, and/or winning an Oscar for Best Animated Feature? Well, that’s too early, since, along with sequels like Super Mario Galaxy, and Toy Story 5, we also have original animated films like Disney/Pixar’s Hoppers, and Walt Disney Animation Studios’ Hexed being released later this year, and the former just coming out today, and already having mostly really great reviews. However, all I can say is that here’s hoping that Goat can at least be nominated for the Best Animated Feature Award at either the Golden Globes, Oscars, you name it. Goat is a unique animated film that any demographics are bound to enjoy for one reason, or another. Though it can come off as stereotypical from trailers shown, people will more than likely come out enjoying Goat more than they expected in the end. For reasons such as these, definitely make a point to see Goat. Not only will you be glad to see this in theaters, particularly due to the fact that this movie definitely was made for the movie theater experience, but you’ll probably have a satisfying feeling after you walk out of the theater once the movie’s over. So, go see this movie, as it’s definitely big screen worthy.

Final Rating: 10/10

Everyone, it is now time to review what some might think to be a documentary, but apparently was a regular film that that was just released in theaters last month. Presenting to you all my review for the one, and only, Melania.

Plot: The movie centers around President Donald Trump, and more so the First Lady, Melania, and the events that occurred before they were elected back in the White House in late 2024/early 2025.

Well, I must say that this was one of the most interesting films to come out. First of all, in some ways, this film can feel like a documentary, since all the characters in this film are real people. However, seeing as, according to Melania, it actually isn’t, that makes this movie even more interesting. First of all, to witness certain events that took place with President Donald Trump, and the First Lady, Melania, before they came back into office, that helped make this film really interesting. I’m not sure how often you hear of stories similar to theirs when it came to prior Presidents, like George W. Bush, and his wife, Biden, and his wife, you name it, before they all stepped into the Oval Office. Also, maybe I’m wrong, but it may seem surprising how Melania, and likely even President Trump, wanted, and still want, to make certain changes to how things are run in the political realm. What’s even more is that this film seems to show how stressful the life of a politician can be, especially when it comes to a President, and First Lady have so much responsibility with running the country. I mean many of us may think that being a President, or a King, you name it, ends up being a one of the most glamorous lives that a person can have. Because of that, it was great to see films like this one show how that’s not always the case. Yeah, you really talk about how, as Ben Parker in 2002’s Spider-Man 1, that “with great power comes great responsibility”. What’s even more is that this film does well wit really having us see the side of President Donald Trump, and Melania, that, without a film like this one, we may not have gotten to know about as much as we did. Additionally, it was really cool that this film walked the audience through of events that happen shortly before a President enters into the Oval Office, certain events, and activities that take place afterwards, you name it. Finally, it was also great to see this movie about Melania especially do well with actually acting like an actual movie rather than a documentary.

And that’s my review of Melania. If you haven’t seen this film, then I highly recommend it. Truthfully, it may yet help open your eyes as to why we should be glad that President Trump, and First Lady, Melania, are currently the ones helping run this country. The movie gives us a better idea of what it likes to try to run for President, what life seems to be like for a President, and the First Lady, and things like that. And, yes, it was great to see activities, and events that occur before, and during an election. And, most importantly, it was great to hear more of Melania’s, and Trump’s for before, and after the election, and getting sworn into office. I would say that if you haven’t seen Melania yet, see it either in theaters if it’s playing near you, or on streaming. It is guaranteed that you’ll enjoy it in the end.

Final Rating: 10/10

Everyone, today, we review a newer action film that stars Chris Pratt, and Rebecca Ferguson. Presenting to you all my review of the one, and only Mercy.

Plot: In futuristic Los Angeles, California, the Mercy Capital Court uses artificial intelligence judges to put defendants on trial for violent crimes. In one particular case, Los Angeles Police Department Detective Chris Raven (Chris Pratt) is put on trial for the supposed murder of his late wife, Nicole. Now, with an hour, and a half of being on trial, can Chris prove to artificial intelligence Judge Maddox (Rebecca Ferguson) that he didn’t commit the murder, or will it turn out that he did in fact commit it after all?

Honestly, because of how good this film is, it’s baffling as to how it didn’t perform all that well at the box office. I mean even though this film revolves around the main character, a police detective in this case, being on trial, it surprisingly works very well. For some people, the premise of a character being on trial for a crime might sound boring, am I right? Well, for those of you that would say yes, then I understand if you might feel that way. Yet, here is another instance, like with some other films here, and there, where I would say “Don’t judge a movie by its trailer, or premise!”.

Why, you may ask? Well, for one, some of the visuals, and 3D effects. I’m not sure if it’s because of the A.I. judges, like Ferguson’s judge character, Judge Maddox, looking real, in spite of likely having CGI to go along with her character, and/or maybe other reasons to go along with that. Regardless, it works beautifully. I mean the way that there are transitions between this event being shown, and that one during Chris’ trial, that makes the visuals work even more.

The setup of the whole premise surprisingly overall is genius. Maybe it’s because of this taking place in a futuristic setting? It might be due to a trial like this one not being quite like your typical trial in real life? You got me!

The acting is also really great. Chris Pratt is especially awesome in his role as the defendant. Same goes for Rebecca Ferguson in her role as the A.I. judge. Not to mention that, despite being an A.I. being in this case, she also acts as a normal human being over the course of this movie as well. The rest of the cast is great too.

In addition to all of these, there is some really great action. What’s even more is that there are really great twists to go along with the film. Considering that you might not quite find yourself predicting who certain villains are, you might find yourself rather shocked by who some of the villains end up being, how certain situations turn out, you name it.

Finally, Mercy serves as a reminder of how even innocent people in life will sometimes get wrongly accused of things that they didn’t even do in the first place. Sad, but true.

If there were any complaints about this film, it would probably be that the film might drag in a few spots here, and there. Thankfully not by much, just a little.

And that’s my review of the action film, Mercy. I’m not sure if this film hasn’t performed Ed as well due to maybe some people might be boycotting actors like Chris Pratt, due to certain beliefs that he withholds? Or was this film not as well marketed as it should have been? You got me on all of this! Regardless, Mercy is a film worth your time. That is especially if you want an action film with a court trial, and an interesting premise to go along with it. And not to mention other mostly great elements like excellent action, excellent twists, and turns, you name it. Honestly, it’s a shame that this film is probably going to disappear into obscurity, and become an underrated action film. That is why I would say to see it whenever you can. You may yet be surprised by how enjoyable it is in the end. So, again, go see it, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9.5/10

Well, everyone, today, we revisit, and give a second review to a lesser known Disney/Pixar film that happened to be one of my very first film reviews a little over a decade ago, when I first started movie reviewing, and just did it just on Facebook. And now, I shall review this a second time around for my blog viewers to see as well. So now, let’s now review a Disney/Pixar film that was released back in 2015, just a few months after the company also released the first Inside Out film. It is the one, and only The Good Dinosaur.

Plot: In an alternate timeline, when the meteor goes past Earth, and doesn’t destroy the dinosaur population, dinosaurs begin to do activities like farming, cattle ranching, and more. Arlo (Raymond Ochoa), the Apatosaurus, and his family are a herd of farmers. One day, when he chases a human boy that’s been taking food from his family’s silo, they both get swept up into a river that causes both of them to be far from home. Now, can Arlo, and the human, whom he names Spot, put aside their differences, and work together to find their way back home?

So, now that The Good Dinosaur has reached its 10-year anniversary as of November of this past year, does it still hold up even after being around for that long? Well, in many ways, yes, and, in others, there were elements that probably didn’t seem to work as well as the filmmakers might have hoped.

First of all, though the film does give the audience to breathe in many spots that probably worked to a little bit of a fault. Okay, let me explain! We do have a good amount of character development. However, there are some scene that might have overstayed their welcome a little much.

What’s even more is that there are some moments that might be a little too intense for a family film.

One other thing to mention is that there can be moments where this Disney/Pixar film might feel like it might be for a little more of a younger audience than for teens, and adults. Oh, don’t get me wrong, it is still for even those age groups too. It’s just that The Good Dinosaur seemed to sometimes feel like it was more for kids, and didn’t seem to hit those more mature, and emotional beats that many of Disney/Pixar’s before this film, and after, seemed to.

Nevertheless, there are many elements that make The Good Dinosaur still really enjoyable. First of all, there’s the score my Mychael, and Jeff Danna. I’m not sure why these film composers seemed to incorporate some Irish music into this score. Well, for whatever reason, it still seems to work really well. That is especially since this is a film that involves farming. What’s more is that the Irish music, and all the other instruments that are incorporated in this score, work just beautifully.

Next, there is the animation. First off, the designs of the characters are really great, especially for a Disney/Pixar film. What’s even more is that the backgrounds, and cinematography is overall phenomenal. Some of the backgrounds, like the mountains, and rivers, almost look very realistic, and look like live-action backgrounds. It just came, and still comes, to show how well the animation industry has become even more revolutionary particularly in the world of Disney/Pixar, and maybe even other animation companies both around the time that this film came out, and after.

Next, there is the storyline. Again, it might not be quite as strong as some of Disney/Pixar’s other entries. However, there is still emotion, heart, and a great amount of creativity put into this film. I mean to have dinosaurs like the Apatosaurus kind be farmers, T-Rexes be cattle ranchers, you name it, how could you not appreciate having a film with a unique spin on a story that revolves around dinosaurs?

Arlo’s relationships with his family, and with Spot, the human, is done really well. Yes, his relationships with maybe some of his family members, like his siblings, could have been fleshed out a little more. Still, his relationships with characters like with Spot, and his parents, are done, and handled well. There are some very heartfelt, and emotional moments that go along with moments with some of them as well. Finally, since T-Rexes aren’t the villains this time around, it may come as a bit of a surprise as to who, or what is the villain this time around.

Finally, the overall message about learning to conquer fears in one’s life are handled really well. I remember a friend of mine pinning out that because of the way the whole message of fear, and conquering it being handled in a rather creative way, The Good Dinosaur could maybe be used as a Sunday school lesson, or maybe could be used in Christian community groups. Can one go so far as to say that? Well, though I’m not sure that I would go quite that far as to say that, that whole lesson that is portrayed in this film is definitely one that serves as a reminder as to why learning to overcome fears of any kind is really important. Truly, it helps make The Good Dinosaur a really good fable as a result.

And that’s my review for The Good Dinosaur. Yeah, either because The Good Dinosaur had some production problems along the way, or some other reasons, the film doesn’t quite live up to its potential. Nevertheless, it works in more ways than not. There’s creativity, emotion, heart, great animation, fun characters, and many other elements that help make The Good Dinosaur worthwhile. It may not be quite as much of a classic like many other Disney/Pixar’s other entries like Toy Story, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, Inside Out, you name it. Still, it is worth seeing, and teens, and adults, will still enjoy it, despite the possibility that kids might like it a little more so in this case. If you’re one of those people who hasn’t seen The Good Dinosaur in any of the ten years of this film’s existence, definitely see it on Disney+, check it out from the library, or whatever works for you. After seeing it, you’d be surprised by how fun, and engaging this movie still is. Again, see it, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 8.5/10

Everyone, today, we review a suspense film that I originally didn’t plan on seeing. However, because a friend of mine wanted to see it rather badly, I agreed to see this one at least for this time around. With that said, let’s talk about this thriller film, Send Help, and stars Rachel McAdams, and Dylan O’Brien.

Plot: When a plane crashes in the ocean on the way to Bangkok, Linda Liddle (Rachel McAdams), and her boss, Bradley Preston (Dylan O’Brien) find themselves being the only survivors, and stranded on the Gulf of Thailand. Now, can they learn survival skills until someone comes, and rescues them?

Well, I will give this film this. Send Help was very suspenseful. It did a good job of portraying how life can be more rough, and difficult when you love on an island, and away from life that many people may know, especially those who end up having good jobs, living in good homes, you name it. Leads Rachel McAdams, and Dylan O’Brien, were also really good leads. The rest of the acting was also really great too. Finally, as far as positives go, there was really great cinematography. And it wasn’t even CGI backgrounds. How about that?

In spite of these positive aspects, however, I’m sure that some, if not a lot, of people that see this film will find themselves thinking that as far as films of this type go, they would probably rather hang out on an island in the Pacific Ocean with someone like Tom Hanks’ character, Chuck Noland in Cast Away, than on the Gulf of Thailand with survivors Linda, and Bradley. I mean putting aside the fact that this film is probably more violent than it should be at times, there is not a whole lot to really like about this movie beside the positive aspects that I mentioned moments ago. First of all, some people do hope that Send Help ends up going in this more positive direction, and that things turn out for the better. I mean even though the actors that portray those respective characters did well in those roles, the characters themselves aren’t all that likable. I mean with the way they each handle their actions, their motives, and things like that, let’s just say that they could have each been better characters. Truly, Send Help had so much potential to make these characters in particular have character growth, learn valuable lessons, and more. Yet, in the end, what we get is characters who, in the end, end up being psychotic, cruel, rude, and downright hateful. Because of this, there was a storyline that also had potential, but, in the end, felt squandered in more ways than not. Finally, there were some lessons that could have been incorporated in this movie, and learned from, but, again, also wasted potential.

And that’s my review for Send Help. It is good in terms of it showing what life can be like when being stranded on an island. It is also really suspenseful at points, and has great acting, both the lead(s), and supporting cast. Aside from elements like those, people can find themselves probably watching either a better thriller suspense film, or just other films period with a storyline similar to this one. I would say that before you spend money on this movie, unless you’re an AMC Stubs Member, and thus can see up to 3, or 4, movies a week, probably just go watch a film like Cast Away, which had a storyline similar to this one, but executed better, or films with Rachel McAdams that are more fun, and lighthearted, and in which McAdams played more likable roles, be it in films like Mean Girls, The Family Stone, Wedding Crashers, you name it. Honestly, after seeing Send Help, I think I’m going to try, and make time to rewatch, and review Cast Away either sometime this year, or next, especially since it just reached it’s 25th anniversary this past December anyway. Anyway, unless you really enjoy suspense thrillers, or even films with some horror elements, probably give Send Help a skip.

Final Rating: 6/10

Well, everyone, today, we finally review the last of the films that I still had yet to review from 2025 before we go full on into 2026. That is, other than me pulling up reviews of films from other years here and there. Anyway, this time around, we talk about a film that happened to be one of the couple of the biggest hits at the box office, alongside Disney’s Zootopia 2, and very few others from this past year. It is the third installment of a franchise that has continued for almost a couple decades, thanks to its popularity. Ladies, and gentlemen, I give you all my review of the third installment in the franchise, the one, and only Avatar: Fire & Ash.

Plot: During another war Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), his queen, Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña), and the rest of their tribe have with Colonel Quaritch (Stephen Lang), and his army that continues to be hellbent on destroying all the Na’vi tribes, he, and his tribe discover a volcanic tribe, known as the Mangkwan tribe, who rejects the Avatar spirit Eywa. During an expedition in which Jake, and his tribe find themselves having to escort Spider (Jack Champion) from their tribe for reasons that would involve keeping him safe, they are Jake, and the gang are attacked by the Mangkwan, led by their matriarch, Varang (Oona Chaplin). Now, as Varang, and Colonel Quaritch surprisingly team up to try, and destroy Jake, Neytiri, and the rest of the Na’vi, along with any other Avatar tribes, can Jake, with any help possible, defeat Varang, and Quaritch, and save their tribe from destruction once, and to all?

So, did Avatar: Fire & Ash somehow end up being superior to Avatar, or Avatar: The Way Of The Water, or did this film fall short of those? Well, I will say this. First of all, Avatar: Fire & Ash did have quite a few highs. First of all, you have to give the movie credit for having really great visuals, just like the first two. Director James Cameron mentioned that if he, and his filmmaking team go through with making the fourth, and fifth films (which he plans to release in 2029, and 2031, respectively), he will likely cut back on budgeting, and not make those sequels as expensive to make. If that happens, will that keep the visuals in the 4th, and 5th films as grand as these three films thus far? More than likely, but I guess we shall see. Well, for now, at least we can be grateful for the fact that the visuals have been great in all three of them thus far. In addition to all of this, it is great to see that for this film being a little over three hours, like the second one, at least, while the first film is at least 2 1/2 hours, the filmmakers do not waste much time, if at all, in making this one as good as possible. Even when it comes to the story, yes, it may be a lot of the same story as the first two films. However, the filmmakers raise the stakes this time not only for the visuals, but also for areas like character development, and even for the story itself.

To begin, when it comes to character development, not only do they do well with developing characters like Jake, Neytiri, and Quaritch, for example, but also with characters like Jake, and Neytiri’s kids, the human character, Spider, and even with the new villain, Varang. Honestly, while the character development was certainly good in the first two movies, they probably did a better job with that aspect in this third film, especially when it came to developing relationships in this movie. Whether it’s Jake, and Neytiri’s relationship, Spider, and Kiri’s, or even Quaritch, and Varang’s once they team up, character development, and the relationships that go along with that, is one of the film’s strongest aspects. Honestly, because we have an Avatar tribe that consists of a group of villains, as well as them just battling the Na’vi, and then teaming up with Quaritch in the process, it likely makes the film a little more interesting than the first two, wouldn’t you say? Honestly, when it comes to especially the villains of this movie, I was a little surprised by the direction that this film took that whole deal. But hey, at least it helps make this film less cliche from the first two films. There are also some additional new characters that are great, like some of the sea creatures that communicate through sound, and require translation, you name it. Finally, there is a really interesting ending that occurs this time around.

In addition to this, because of us getting new characters, and there being more things going on, Avatar: Fire & Ash doesn’t seem to feel like much of a retread of the first movie at least like the second film seemed to be at least to a degree. What’s more is that Cameron does well with expanding the world building in this third film. Interestingly enough, this third film does well with incorporating new elements that were not present in the first two movies. After seeing this movie, people will probably be surprised to find the sorts of surprises that are found in this film? Does this mean that people will like Avatar: Fire & Ash as much as Avatar, or Avatar: The Way Of Water? Well, maybe not in every way, but probably at least in some ways, yes.

However, like quite a few films, Avatar: Fire & Ash is not without a some flaws here and there. First of all, there were some action scenes that might have dragged on a little too long, most notably one scene that occurs between the beginning, and middle of the film, when we’re first introduced to Varang, and the rest of the ash tribe. What’s more is that there were maybe a couple additional scenes that might have dragged on a little too long at times. Because of all of that, this third film probably didn’t need to be as long as it was. But hey, at least it gave the movie reason to keep going for a little while longer. In addition to this, when the climax occurs, I won’t give away what happens for those of you that haven’t seen this movie yet, but still plan to. I will at least say this, the climax, let’s just say felt a little like a cop out around the very end. I’m sure that might not have been Cameron’s intention. Still, the way that the climax wrapped up could have probably been handled better. One other thing to mention is that the way that character growth was handled, and how some characters were even dealt with, it was a little strange too.

And that’s my review for Avatar: Fire & Ash. Though there were some aspects of this film that could have made it better, Avatar: Fire & Ash still remains one of the stringer sequels out there. There’s really excellent world building, cool visuals, a lot of great character development that make this film eye catching. It most certainly was a great way to spend at least the Christmas holidays, or at least seeing it shortly afterwards. If you want a sequel that not only is eye opening visually, but also improves with areas like character development, and growth, then all the more reason to see Avatar: Fire & Ash. The characters are likable, and people are bound to love any newer elements that get incorporated this time around. Definitely go see Avatar: Fire & Ash, if you can. You may yet be surprised this time around.

Final Rating: 8.5/10

Hey, everyone, first of all, hope you’re all doing well. Second, welcome to another session of movie reviewing! Now, a lot of you are familiar with some of James Cameron’s works, like Titanic, and the Avatar movies, yes? And some of you are familiar with movie directors like Gore Verbinski, who directed films like the Pirates Of The Caribbean trilogy, and the 2011 Paramount Pictures film, Rango, for example, are you not? Why am I bringing up both directors in today’s review, you may ask? Well, Cameron, because he released Titanic back on Friday, December 19th, 1997. And, as I’m sure many of us know, Titanic went on to become a really popular film, evidently making more money than many movies seemed to have made in theaters even back then. Not to mention that the movie got re-released in theaters for its 25th anniversary just a few years ago. Oh, and side note, I did see Titanic when it was re-released back in, I believe, February 2023, for its 25th anniversary. Another side note, for those of you that are newer to my blog, I did review Titanic shortly after that. So feel free to look for that review, if you’re interested. Anyway, on the same day that Titanic was first released, Gore Verbinski, who was fairly new to the movie making industry at the time, also came out with a comedy film that was a mostly family friendly movie. Oh, and did I forget to mention that this was one of the films to be released pre-Pirates Of The Caribbean? Well, that’s the subject of today’s review. Oh, but that’s not all. At the time that this film was released, DreamWorks was a fairly newer company that was founded by Jeffrey Katzenberg (who used to be one of the main leads at Disney, but unfortunately left on rather bitter terms with the company), David Geffen, and Steven Spielberg. What’s more is that this live-action DreamWorks movie was released just a year before the company gave the general public their very first two, of many, animated films, Antz, and The Prince Of Egypt (which were released in October 1998, and December 1998, respectively). Ladies, and gentlemen, I give you my review of what may be a fairly underrated family comedy film, and stars Nathan Lane, and Lee Evans. Ooh, and it’s probably worth noting that Christopher Walken is also in this film in a more minor role. Not to mention, that this movie was William Hickey’s last role, as he passed away just a few months before the film’s release. Anyway, I now give you all my review of Mouse Hunt. Let’s begin now!

Plot: After the passing away of their father, Rudolph Smuntz (William Hickey), brothers Ernie, and Lars Smuntz (Nathan Lane, and Lee Evans, respectively) are left with their father’s string factory, Smuntz String Co., and a large mansion. But after they occupy the house, they discover that the place is occupied by a tiny mouse. Now, before they get the house renovated, and auctioned, can the brothers get rid of the mouse, despite a series of mishaps that make the job not an easy task?

From at least the plot synopsis, this probably sounds like a simple children’s/family story, yes? Well, as it turns out, Mouse Hunt is maybe a little more complex in this case. On the surface, though it may be for kids in more ways than not, there is plenty for adults to recommend as well. Actually, as it turns out, basically all ages will be able to enjoy Mouse Hunt for a variety of reasons. For the kids, that will be for any scenes that involve the mouse, and any comedic moments. For teens, and adults, especially the latter group, it will be for not only the comedy especially, but also for some of the fairly heavy subject matters that are involved in this film, whether it’s learning to deal with living in, and/or paying for expensive homes, budgeting money, you name it. While kids might not care about such adults matters all that much, hopefully they’ll ask some questions here and there to their parents after seeing this film. Plus, how can you go wrong with actors like Lee Evans, and especially Nathan Lane? If you’re especially a fan of Lane, you’ll more than likely enjoy this film even more, especially since there’s a point where he makes a certain reference to a popular line from Disney’s The Lion King (ironic, considering Lion King came out 3, or 3 1/2 years before Mouse Hunt). I mean it might drag a little bit for the first 10, 15, maybe 20 minutes. However, after that, when main characters Ernie, and Lars get to the mansion, things begin to get more hysterical. Yes, even then, there will still be some serious, and even emotional moments from time to time. Still, the comedy helps carry this film from beginning to end. And quite honestly, instead of relying on mainly comedy to keep this film going, Mouse Hunt does well with balancing out the comedy, a good storyline, well developed characters, especially with the main characters, and more. Also, how could you not love even the mouse, who’s probably one of the more smarter mice to appear in specifically a live-action film? I mean with as much drama, and trouble as the mouse gives Ernie, and Lars, it makes this film all the more fun to watch. There are also really good supporting characters to go along for the ride, whether it’s Lars’ wife, April, a judge, a character named Alexander Falko, and an exterminator in this film named Caesar. One other thing to mention regarding the characters is that even though Ernie, and Lars may be polar opposites in terms of how they go about getting certain tasks done, they still seem to have good hearts. Even so, when I was a kid, I believed Ernie to be a villain (or starting out that way), and Lars being the hero. However, it would seem that it’s more that Ernie has maturing to do in his way of thinking, and Lars needs to help him along the way.

The score by Alan Sylvestri was also really fun, especially with all the instruments involved.

Additionally, there’s a little bit of fantasy involved in this film, particularly of a painting of Ernie, and Lars’ dad, Rudolph. Basically, there are points where Rudolph, in the painting, gives all kinds of expressions throughout the film, whether it’s feelings of happiness, a frown, or even of disgust at one point for reasons that I won’t go into.

In addition to all of this, other than there being a tiny bit of foul language, the script is also really brilliant. What’s more is that there is plenty of creativity, and heart, put into Mouse Hunt. Though Verbinski may have had slightly better films that followed like Pirates Of The Caribbean, he still knew how to get some creative flare even in Mouse Hunt as well. What’s even more is that this film is a good representation of what life is like from time to time, and the hardships that can sometimes go along with it.

What’s more is that there are really, really great lessons to take away from Mouse Hunt, whether it’s about learning to take care others, standing up for others, and yourself, and learning to be grateful for things that one does have in life.

Finally, there’s the ending for this film. I won’t give away how this film ends. However, I will at least say that you’d be surprised by how this film ends. It’s creative, and is a good surprise, and a good addition to an already good film.

But does this film have issues? A couple, yes. First of all, there are some times when the movie can feel a little crude at times. Thankfully that’s kept more to a minimum (which is more than one can say about later DreamWorks movies like Shrek, or, to a lesser degree, Antz, or The Road To El Dorado), but still. The other issue that Mouse Hunt has is that there are one, or two, points where film could be a little risqué for a family film. Yes, kids can still enjoy the film. It’s just that some kids, and for sure adults could be turned off especially by the latter flaw for this film.

And that’s my review for Mouse Hunt. Do I think Mouse Hunt is better, and/or should have made more money than Titanic? Other than Mouse Hunt being the more funny film, no, definitely not. Still, it was great to have this film released around Christmas time back in 1997. The characters are great. I mean come on, again with the actors, they were great. Also, the main characters, and even the supporting ones, are likable to one degree, or another. The storyline is also simple, but also fun, complex, and creative. Everything else like the score, and especially the comedy, which is one of the major selling points of this movie, make this movie all the more fun. These, along with any valuable lessons that can be taken away from this film, make Mouse Hunt truly worth your time. If you haven’t seen Mouse Hunt yet, definitely make it a point to. If you want a movie with mostly well-known actors, great comedy, a creative story, and valuable lessons to take away, then all the more reason to see Mouse Hunt. So if you still have yet to, please give this film a chance, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9/10

Well, everyone, today, we review an animated film that was just released this past Christmas, and has apparently made box-office money, likely thanks partly to it being released around Christmas time. Not only that, but it was made by the newer Christian studio, Angel Studios, the same company that made popular shows like The Chosen (which is still going on at least for another couple seasons). Oh, and what’s more is that Christian singer Phil Wickham is in this film, voicing the main character in this animated film that we’re viewing as of now. How about that? Anyway, let’s discuss the one, and only animated film that is based on the books of 1st, and 2nd Samuel from the Bible. Presenting to you all my review of the animated movie musical, David.

Plot: The movie centers around David (Brandon Engman as young David, and Phil Wickham as adult David), and his journey from him being a shepherd, to his anointing as the second king of Israel by the prophet Samuel, and all the other events that led to him becoming king.

Now so many people that have seen this latest offering from Angel Studios have been saying wonderful things about it like how it’s a really great faith-based animated movie, the music is wonderful, and more. So, after seeing this film for myself, are the masses that have seen this movie right? Well, for the most part, very much so. Here’s the thing! There was at least one area in which the movie could have been slightly better. That being that there were one, or two aspects from the Biblical account that omitted in this film that probably shouldn’t have been. Whether that was either due to time constraint, making kids ask more questions about David, Saul, and all the characters, and events from 1st, and 2nd Samuel, you got me. Now, some moments of this part of the Bible I can understand why they were omitted from this film. But others, yeah, they could have maybe been kept in somehow. Oh well!

Aside from that, yes, David is really great. First of all, it was great to see this film not end with certain points that have sometimes had it end in other adaptations of this particular event in history. For those of you who have seen other adaptions of this account of the Bible, you likely know what I’m talking about. Anyway, it also was great to see this film truly capture the culture of Israel. I mean with the music having a Middle Eastern feel, and the score by someone named Joseph Trapanese, it makes this movie even better. Yeah, it helps make David be one of the best Christian animated films since maybe 1998’s DreamWorks animated movie, The Prince Of Egypt.

Then, there’s the animation. Holy cow, what an improvement from say earlier films like The King Of Kings (which was released around Easter 2025)! Hear me out! Yes, The King Of Kings had good animation too. However, it was almost like David had better animation in terms of things like better designs on the characters, better facial expressions, emoting from the characters, you name it. In addition to that, the animation also helped express both the good, lighthearted, and, yes I have a right to say it in this case, the Holy moments, as well as the really dark, and tense moments. Honestly, just as animated films from companies like Disney, and DreamWorks, in particular, can do well with symbolism in such scenes in any movies they have come out with, the same can be said here in the Angel Studios film, David.

Next, there’s the character development. First of all, again, it was great to see this film not only be a coming of age story, like with say other recent Faith-based animated films like Light Of The World, but also help develop the characters in the best way possible. I heard in an interview that it took directors Phil Cunningham, and Brent Dawes around thirty years to make this film. Yeah, how often is that the case when making animated films, or films period? Well, regardless, did it pay off? Very much so! I mean the movie David did really well with portraying what Samuel the prophet may have been like, or how David’s character develops from the time of being a kid, and a shepherd, to how King Saul’s character progresses over the course of this movie, you name it. It was also great that the filmmakers used imagination in terms of how certain characters may have felt when it came to this situation, or that situation (i.e. scenes such as David getting anointed King of Israel by the prophet, Samuel, and the possible reaction that he may have had to that, and other scenes that involved other characters, and situations that they found themselves in from time to time). Finally, it was great to develop the relationships, whether it be David, and Jonathan’s relationship, or even David’s relationship with those with his family. I mean yes, in the Bible, we have a glimpse of what things were like between say David, and his father, Jesse, and his siblings. But we don’t know much about David’s relationship with his mother, or with his sister, Zeruiah. So to even have that relationship between him, and both of them, that was a really nice touch to this film.

Additionally, there’s the storyline of David itself. Wow, all I can say is how impressive this film was overall. First of all, the fact that this film stuck as close to the Biblical account of David as possible, while also taking liberties in the process, that right there shows how much the filmmakers at Angel Studios that were involved in making in this film were wanting to tell this story visually in the best way possible. And the fact that they took around thirty years to get the job done, yeah, that says plenty. Also, again, how could we not appreciate that this film covered material even beyond after David’s fight with Goliath? And what’s more is that, on the surface, this adaptation of David may look like one that’s mainly geared for kids. And yes, this film is more around the children’s to family type of film. However, because of the fact that there are some very dark moments, as well as some scenes that are a little violent for an animated film, and rightfully so, David accomplishes it’s mission to also appeal to older audiences in terms of teens, and adults as well. In other words, David is basically for all ages because of that. Finally, while the film does have comedy in it, it doesn’t have to rely on that to make this film good. In fact, this film does well with balancing it’s lighthearted moments, it’s darker, and emotional moments, and more to make this film more unique, and special in the world of animation, and cinema period. Truly, it is a shame that this film didn’t get nominated for Best Animated Feature either for Golden Globes, or Oscars. But hey, I guess that’s typical Hollywood for all of us, isn’t it? Oh well? But hey, at least we can be grateful for the fact that one, this film did well with developing its story really well, and covering as much as possible. Sure, there was only so much that could be covered, but at least the filmmakers were willing to push the boundaries by making this film around two hours, instead of around an hour, and a half, like many animated films. Finally, especially because this was an animated film that was obviously trying to appeal to all ages, can we take time to appreciate that there were moments in which this film could have been live-action, but yet the creators decided to bring this adaptation of the Biblical account into animation instead? Just saying!

Finally, we can’t have this review without talking about the music. And I’m not talking about the score that I mentioned around the beginning of this film. I’m talking about the songs that went along with this film. If not all of them, a great majority of them are memorable. There are six songs altogether, consisting of songs like “Psalm 8”, “Tapestry”, “Why God-My God”, “Shalom”, “The Adventure Song”, and, one of my personal songs, “Follow The Light”. They’re really good. Sure, Christians are the ones that will probably have more of an appreciation for them. Still, hopefully these songs will serve as a factor that will help even non-Christians have more questions for more of this part of the Bible, and possibly the rest of the Bible period. One other thing to appreciate about the music for this film is how much symbolism is incorporated in some of the numbers that are sung over the course of this film. There are also some really messages to go along with some of them as well, particularly with a few of the numbers that truly stand out in this film. One final thing to note is can we take time to appreciate the fact that Phil Wickham is the one to voice adult David in this film? Okay, yes, it will be the Christian music fans that will be fans of that, since Phil’s a Christian artist. Still, as much of an impact as Phil has been making in the Christian music industry, and in many people’s lives period, that, right there, should be an added bonus for this movie, wouldn’t you say?

And that’s my review for David. For an animated film that could have come out at any time of the year, Christmas time was probably a great time for this movie to come out. I mean let’s not forget that our Lord, and Savior was descended from the line of David, you know? Plus, since Christmas through New Year’s is a busy time for movies, that probably helped this boost this movie in popularity, along with known Christian artist, and actor Phil Wickham voicing the main character, and more, you know? Personally, if I were to pick a movie that was released during the period of Thanksgiving through Christmas, and New Year’s that I would rewatch multiple times in both theaters, and on video, David would most definitely be it. Yes, we had other great films like Avatar: Fire & Ash, Zootopia 2, Song Sung Blue, and films like those. Still, none of those hold a candle to this movie. David, though occasionally corny at times, still is great at capturing the heart of this point in time in Biblical history. Truly, I tell you that if you want to see an animated film that is aimed at all audiences, and does well with capturing the spirit of this part of the Bible, and want mostly, if not fully memorable music, then David is a must-see. Hard to believe!?! Well, all the more reason that I advise you all to see this film, and in theaters, if at all possible. I can guarantee you’ll be surprised by how well done David is in the end. So, again, see this film, and see what you think! Also, here’s hoping that any other Biblical account that Angel Studios adapts to the big screen progressively gets better, and better from here on out!

Final Rating: 9.5/10

Well, everyone, today, we review a biography of an African American man who ended being one of the more extraordinary people in American history, maybe even history period. The movie stars Ed Harris, Cuba Gooding Jr., and other people. Presenting to you all my review of the 2003 biographical sports drama film, Radio!

Plot: Radio chronicles how a 23-year-old mentally disabled African American named James Kennedy (Cuba Gooding Jr.) became extraordinary when he walked into the life of Coach Harold Jones (Ed Harris), his family, high school football team at T.L. Hanna High School, and the rest of the community in Anderson, South Carolina. It portrays how James was nicknamed “Radio” after Coach Jones sees him like a radio, and how Radio would change the lives of many people in the community from there.

Wow, first of all, what an excellent story to make into a movie. I’m not sure how much of a Christian aspect there was for James Kennedy, and the whole community surrounding him in real life. Regardless, there are plenty of underlying messages that can be seen from a Christian perspective throughout the course of this film. I mean to have James Kennedy/Radio getting scorned by people who chose to not understand him at first, and then for some of those people to have a change of heart slowly, but surely, wow, what a great way of showing how, by the work of the Holy Spirit, people can in fact have a change of attitude, and heart towards other people that may be different from them. And yes, because of there being one, or two where you see our main characters coming out of a church service, it would seem likely maybe there was more of the Christian, God-like loving aspect to this story than was portrayed in this film. But what do I know? You get me! Anyway, this film, like films such as Remember The Titans, and The Rookie, does well with portraying what life was like for the main characters, and the supporting ones that were in this film. Anyway, this movie is more than just a sports movie. It is a film that truly touches on tough subjects such as learning to love on, and care for those with disabilities, and other kinds of people that we may not always know, or understand, how to love on from time to time. And yes, it would say that, to a degree, it may briefly touch on subjects like racism, and learning to see things from another person’s perspective. Hmm! How interesting that a Disney animated film by the name of Brother Bear would be released a week after this movie, and touch for sure on the subject of perspective taking, eh? Also, a lot of people will find themselves relating to any one of these characters for one reason, or another. Yeah, when a movie is able to reach to anyone, it makes the film work even more. And Radio hits just that very goal. Anyway, there is a fantastic score by James Horner. Now, I will admit that in past movies that he scored in like Jurassic Park, Casper, The Land Before Time, and Hook, his score almost seems recognizable, and can tell that it’s him scoring for a movie. That doesn’t seem to be the case this time around. I’m not sure if that’s because Horner used different instruments to compose his score this time around, or something else. Well, whatever the case may be, his score seemed more distinct from other movies that he scored for in the past. Finally, after people see Radio, more people will then be reminded of why it’s important to love others, and show compassion for those who may be mentally challenged, have disabilities of any kind, you name it.

And that’s my review for Radio. Wow, watching this film again years later, it is definitely better than I remembered. I’m not sure how many people remember this movie from when it came out back in 2003. One way, or another, this is a film that is worth seeing not only because it appeals even to some things that happen in the world even today, but also because it serves as a reminder as to why we need to show more love, care, compassion, and everything that goes with them when it comes to showing the love of Jesus to others. Anyway, if you haven’t seen Radio, as well as want a film that is classified as a drama film, but also incorporates comedy from time to time, then all the more reason to see this movie. Plus, how can you go wrong with good casting, especially with actors like Ed Harris, and Cuba Gooding Jr.? Well, give Radio a watch, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 10/10

Well, everyone, today, we review the latest biopic. It is one that chronicles a couple that served as a Neil Diamond tribute band. It stars Hugh Jackman, and Kate Hudson as our main characters. Presenting to you all my review of the biopic, Song Sung Blue, which is based on a 2008 documentary of the same name, and chronicles a lot of the life of this couple, and their journey.

Plot: The movie chronicles the life of musicians Mike Sardina (Hugh Jackman), and his wife, Claire (Kate Hudson), who served as the Neil Diamond tribute band, Lightning & Thunder. It tells of the journey of the band, both highs, and lows, and anything else that went along with their journey.

First of all, I was completely surprised to find out what this film ended up being about. I mean after seeing previews for this movie, I went into this film thinking this was going to be a biopic about Neil Diamond himself. Boy, was I in for a surprise when it turned out that this film is actually a biopic about the tribute band for Neil Diamond, “Lightning & Thunder”. After seeing this film, I was also surprised by how much I found myself watching it, and watching a biopic that isn’t based on a Christian artist, or band, you know? Honestly, it wouldn’t be surprising if, after other people see this movie that have yet to, they would find themselves enjoying it more than other recent biopics like Rocket Man (which was about Elton John), or Bohemian Rhapsody (which, of course, was about Freddie Mercury/Queen). Now, is that to say that Rocket Man, or Bohemian Rhapsody were bad movies? No, absolutely not! In fact, they were still good movies. It’s just that, Song Sung Blues seemed like a more fun movie in this case. Now yes, like some of the other biopics that we have seen come out in more recent years, there were some sad, and depressing moments here in this film too. However, what makes Song Sung Blues stand out even more, in this case, is that while there were some sad, and depressing moments here too, it also felt more fun, lighthearted, and uplifting this time around. Not only is that the case with the storyline itself, but also probably thanks to the stars of this particular film, Hugh Jackman, and Kate Hudson. First of all, once again, just as Hugh Jackman did well with bringing his singing talents to films like 2012’s Les Miserables, and 2017’s The Greatest Showman, he does the same with Song Sung Blues. Even Kate Hudson does well with that. After seeing this film, I was shocked to hear how well she even sings. If anyone here found a film that she sings in, please let me know. Anyway, Jackman, and Hudson not only have great chemistry between their respective lead characters, but chances are people might find themselves wishing that they starred in other films together as well. In addition to all of this, this film did well with showing the character growth with each of these characters, especially with Mike, Claire, and even secondary ones like Rachel, Claire’s daughter from her first marriage, or Angelina, Mike’s daughter from his first marriage. Oh, and that’s another strength for this film. That being the story being well developed, the characters being well developed, and the movie not being afraid to show both the great times that happened for these characters, and the struggles that went along with many of them. Oh, and one other thing to appreciate about this film is how we got at least a little bit exposed to some of Neil Diamond’s other works in addition to his big hit, “Sweet Caroline”, including ones like “Soolaimon”, and, of course, “Song Sung Blue”. Honestly, and maybe this is just personal preference rather than anything against this movie, but it might have been nice to hear this tribute band sing a little more of Neil Diamond’s work. But hey, at least we got to hear a little more of Diamond’s work in this film. Finally, this film does well with teaching some really valuable lessons, like drawing lines between wanting to make people happy, playing things safe, and being willing to sometimes take risks, being patient with others that you care about, and loving others in spite of mistakes that they might make in life.

And that’s my review for Song Sung Blues. So, I guess the question remains, is it going to be films that come out around Christmas time, like last year’s “A Complete Unknown”, or this year’s “Song Sung Blue”, or even biopics that come out around Christmas time, that will end up being the more enjoyable ones than those that have come out at different points in past years in the end? Well, you got me! Well, one thing is for sure. “A Complete Unknown”, and “Song Sung Blue” have been a couple of the better biopics that have been released in more recent years. It’s a fun time at the movies, Hugh Jackman, and Kate Hudson are phenomenal in this movie as their respective characters, along with the supporting cast as their respective characters, the music is awesome, and there some really valuable lessons to learn from this film. Also, can we take time to appreciate that this is likely, if I’m not mistaken, one of the first films, if not the first one, to be a biopic featuring a tribute band to an artist, or band, instead of one about the artist, or band itself? All to say, if you can, definitely take the opportunity to see Song Sung Blue in theaters. It may not be an experience with visual effects, or seeing objects in 3D. Still, because of the wonderful story that goes along with this film, and all that goes with it, you’ll find yourself glad that you saw it in the end. So yes, please don’t wait until this movie’s On Demand to see it if possible. See it sooner instead, if you can. I can guarantee you won’t be disappointed. So, again, see it ASAP, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 10/10