And now, after 15 years of Disney being absent from the Tron film series following the 2010 release of Tron: Legacy, Disney decided to revive the franchise by releasing a third film just recently. And now, it is time to dive into the third film that was released just three weeks ago, on Friday, October 10th, 2025, the one, and only Tron: Ares.

Plot: 15 years after Sam Flynn attempted to bring his father back from the Grid, ENCOM chief executive officer Eve Kim (Greta Lee), and her business partner, Ajay Singh (Hasan Minhaj) must use a permanence code for ENCOM to prevent Julian Dillinger (Evan Peters), and his mother, Elisabeth (Gillian Anderson) from bringing life forms Ares (Jared Leto), and second-in-command Athena (Jodie Turner-Smith) from Tron, and into the real world to potentially wreak havoc. Will their plan succeed in the end?

Well, even though this may not be one of the best sequels out there, Tron: Ares still has some good things going for it. The music, and score by Nine Inch Nails was really good. Once again, it helps keep an 80s vibe that started with the very original film back in the early 1980s, when the Tron franchise began. And yes, it will sound a little cliche, but the visuals are really good, especially when you see objects that involve Tron. It also did well with tying the first two films in the movie as well, especially with things like having Julian being the grandson of Ed Dillinger, Kevin Flynn playing a role in the third film, and things like that. The acting was also really great. And come on, particularly for those of us that have watched both the first two films before this third one, who wouldn’t appreciate Jeff Bridges returning as Kevin Flynn? There is also lots, and lots of great action. And what’s even more is how many of the action scenes in this installment are really well-choreographed. A friend of mine, and I saw this film in 3D. Wow, seeing some of the characters ride on the digital Tron bikes made it even more special, and awesome. If you still have yet to see this film, and have an opportunity to see it in 3D, I would highly recommend it. That is if you have ticket discounts for movies. But more on that in a bit! Oh, and did I forget to mention that people who especially saw the first film will likely have an appreciation for scenes that give a nod to that very first film by incorporating part of the old graphics of the Tron world into this third film? Yeah, people who have seen especially the first Tron film from 1982 will more than likely have an appreciation of that. Finally, for positives, this film will hopefully serve as a reminder as to why attempting to create artificial intelligent life forms likely won’t be a good idea either now, or likely ever.

But now, why don’t we talk about the negatives? Well, there’s the story itself. Honestly, even though it most definitely had a good setup, there was likely some potential for it to be better developed. I mean some of the characters, especially the villains, felt a little jaded, one-dimensional, and seemed to miss an opportunity to be better developed, possibly be more complex. They did at least try with at least Elisabeth Dillinger, but even that could have been handled better. And yeah, trying to incorporate more newer characters in, I’m not sure that was the best idea. I mean they probably could have somehow just maybe had Sam Flynn, and Quorra come back for this third film. Honestly, it might have helped tie things from the first two films better, and likely even helped make this third film better. And, honestly, the third film felt a little like an imitation of at least the first film. Now, for those of you who haven’t seen the first film, that may not be an issue for you. Still, for those of us that have seen both the first, and second films, it could potentially be an issue for them. Just a thought there! Finally, the storyline, the world building of additional Tron material, and more, could have maybe somehow been explored more in this third, and final installment.

And that’s my review for Tron: Ares. Though it does have a nice setup, and a fairly good premise, the way that the third film still had potential to be better. It wasn’t a bad sequel. It was just okay. Truly, though, Tron: Ares, and it’s underwhelming box-office seem to serve as proof that maybe there is in fact a point in time when companies like Disney, DreamWorks, Universal, or other companies, especially nowadays in an age where we have a lot of sequels, and remakes, need to learn when to retire some franchises at some point. Look, I realize that movie companies need to find a way to attempt to make money. Still, companies like Disney need to learn to try to somehow come up with more original ideas, and do their best to execute it well. Even Walt Disney himself would likely agree with that. Anyway, because Tron: Ares hasn’t performed as well at the box-office, and may have strayed a little much from the first two films, that may be a lesson that Disney needs to learn to draw a line with trying to make money, and being more creative. And yes, that goes for other movie companies too. Hopefully, Tron: Ares will help serve as a lesson into when a franchise should continue, and when a franchise should retire at some point. All to be said, I would say definitely still see Tron: Ares if you either saw the first two films, are a Disney fan, or a big movie buff overall. Just be warned that after seeing this third film, you’ll probably find yourself thinking that you would probably just rather stick with the first two films, or even hang with John O’ Leary, experiencing his difficult journey in Soul On Fire (which, of course, was released on the same day as this film) than be on another adventure with the older, and newer characters of the Tron franchise. But all the more reason to see this film, just to be curious, and see if you agree, or disagree with me on that!

Final Rating: 6.5/10

Well, everyone, today, we reach the milestone of 750 reviews. Now, I do have a confession to make. As many of you can tell, I’m not usually one to review newer releases when it comes to milestones of my reviews, like the 550th one, my 600th one, so on, and so forth. So why is that the case this time around, you may be wondering? Well, before I answer that, I will confess that originally, I planned to review an older film, like usual. However, because of hearing how great this film was from a pastor at my church, who briefly spoke about this film, and recommended, and also because the timing was perfect, I figured I’d review today’s review, and save the other one that I planned for a different milestone review instead. So now, let’s discuss a faith-based film that was released a couple weeks, on the same day as Disney’s Tron: Ares, the one, and only Soul On Fire, which was made by Sony, and Affirm Films.

Plot: The film chronicles the early life, and adult life of author John O’Leary (Joel Courtney). From when he was a kid, and had a major life-changing accident that involved, the movie then shows all the struggles that he had to overcome, and how his faith God helped him to do so.

Wow, first of all, I’m glad that the pastor at my church recommended this film. Second, Soul On Fire serves as proof as to why more people need to go, and support faith-based while they are in theaters. Quite honestly, I am one of hopefully quite a few people that is heartbroken to see movies like Light Of The World, The Senior, and now Soul On Fire not perform all that well at the box-office. Is this because of there being a lack of advertisement for films like these, are especially Christians not into recent films like these for some reason, or is it a combination of these, along with maybe other reasons? Well, you got me! With all of that, Soul On Fire is definitely worth seeing for quite a few reasons. For one, the script is phenomenal. There is a line that is repeated a few times throughout this film that is probably one of the most memorable lines in the entire movie. I won’t say what it is for those of you that haven’t seen Soul On Fire yet. However, after you see this film, let’s just say that my hope, and prayer, is that it’s a line that will touch you, and speak to each one of you deeply. Next, not only is this a faith-based film, but, especially since it’s based on a true story, the movie does well with depicting the realities of life really well. Next, there is the acting. Oh man, the acting is really great, especially Dennis being played by Joel Courtney, or Jack Buck by William H. Macy. Oh, and did I forget to mention that John Corbett, whose works include playing Ian Miller in My Big Fat Greek Wedding, plays Dennis, John’s father, in this movie? Hopefully, that right there would help give people more incentive to see this movie, especially for those who saw My Fat Greek Wedding a long time ago, and enjoyed it. Additionally, the characters were well done. In fact, having each of the characters well developed helped put more heart into this film. The script was also really great. But one of the major highlights of this film was how John was willing to fight to stay alive, regardless of how much pain he was going through, how much time it took for him to heal from the fire accident that he was in, and especially how much he was willing to trust in God no matter what circumstances he had to go through. Truly, after seeing this movie, we can definitely learn some valuable lessons from John O’Leary. Finally, Soul On Fire does help teach the audience valuable lessons, from learning the reminder to trust God at all times, having the courage to share faith with others, and not letting mistakes, or hurts of the past, define us. It’s also worth noting that seeing that films like Soul On Fire, Soul Surfer, and last year’s Reagan, were all directed by the same director, Sean McNamara. Now, don’t get me wrong. Faith-based films, especially more recent ones, and ones that have been made for almost 20+ years, are good to one degree, or another, be it Facing The Giants, Courageous, War Room, you name it. However, the way that Sean McNamara seems to help craft faith-based films, he seems to have a way of crafting them in a way that seems really enriching, and engaging, Soul Surfer, Reagan, and Soul On Fire being among them.

And that’s my review for Soul On Fire. Truly, I think that it’s saddening to know that films like Tron: Ares, and some horror films teased this month are the ones getting even a little more popularity, while films like Soul On Fire are getting somewhat buried in the ground so to speak. Seeing as that seems to be the case, I do hope that in the fairly near future, movies like Soul On Fire will have more people watching either while it’s in theaters, or when it comes out On Demand. If you haven’t seen Soul On Fire yet, please do so ASAP. You’ll be glad that you did afterwards. Let’s really hope movies like Soul On Fire serve as proof as to why more faith-based films need to be supported by us, the audience! Seriously! So again, see this hopefully in theaters first, if you can!

Final Rating: 10/10

Well, everyone, today, we review the second entry in the Tron franchise. After this, I will give you all a special review for my 750th, and then Tron: Ares after that. For now, let’s discuss the 2010 sequel to the 1982 hit, Tron, the one, and only Tron: Legacy.

Plot: 20 years after the events of the first film, Sam Flynn (Garrett Hedlund), the son of Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges), is given the keys to the old Tron game, he then is teleported into the Tron game, where he discovers that his father is still alive. Now, with the help of their friend, Quorra (Olivia Wilde), can the three of them defeat a corrupt program named Clu (also Jeff Bridges), and get themselves transported back out of the game, and back into the real world once and for all?

Okay, first of all, this sequel, of course, got released 28 years after the first film was first released in 1982. Was it worth it, or should this sequel have never happened? Well, I’m delighted to tell you all that this is one of the rare times where the sequel is just as great, maybe even outshines the first film. Well, in this case, that was bound to happen, seeing as there was more advanced technology even back in 2010. First of all, Tron: Legacy keeps in the spirit of the first film by having the score have an 80s theme type of score. Yes, some of the score does feel modern as well. However, the score does feel more old school, as well as modern at the same time. Not to mention that it helps make the movie feel more memorable. And the soundtrack was good too. Next, there are the characters. Oh man, they are done really well. Honestly, I’m not sure if it might have been because of the beginning not dragging by much, if at all, and the movie helping get main character Sam into the Tron universe as quickly as possible. Whatever it was, the film does an excellent job of developing it’s continuation of the story, and, in the process, it’s characters, and world building as well. Even the relationships are handled well, including Sam’s relationship with his father, a female named Quorra, and even relationships with minor characters like Alan Bradley, Gemini, and Zuse/Castor. Even Clu was an excellent main villain. There also could be some potential parallels to parts of the Bible in Tron: Legacy as well, most notably how Clu caused rebellion in the Tron world, and was almost acting like both the devil, and the Antichrist in terms of trying to deceive many others in the Tron game about why he should be leader of the game, and not Kevin Flynn. Kevin, Sam, and Quorra also were good, not great representations of good, and how there was still good to be found either in the world of Tron, or the real world. What’s even more is that the graphics were such a vast improvement from the original 1982 Tron movie. I mean those visuals were beautiful, amazing, and most likely will not be dated. Well, if, eventually, they are, maybe not as quickly as those of the original Teon film seemed to be. Truly, I can only imagine how those who saw this movie in 3D when it first came out probably had a really amazing experience in the process. And yes, it also had so many elements of a good film in terms of some comedy, great visuals effects, wonderful storytelling, and, of course, excellent action, among many other things. Finally, the characters likely seemed to have more depth to them than even those of the first film surprisingly seemed to be.

Truly, if there were any flaws with Tron:Legacy, it would be that they could have probably handled Kevin Flynn a little better than they did. Yeah, they did do okay with his character. Still, in some aspects, his character could have been handled a little better.

And that’s my review for Tron:Legacy. If you haven’t seen this film, but have an interest in it, due to either loving video games, wonderful visual effects, or enjoyed the first film, then all the more reason to see it. Honestly, considering this didn’t come out until 28 years after the first film, you can tell that it paid off for the most part. Can the same be said about the third film that came out fifteen years later? We shall see. For now, if you liked Tron, the first one, then make a point to see this second one. You’ll be glad that you did in the end, maybe even more so than seeing the first one, I’m sure.

Final Rating: 9.5/10

Everyone, today, we review a film that was released 30 years ago, and got re-released in theaters in honor of that being the case. And hey, with Halloween being this month, it was likely fitting for a film like this ghost story to be re-released this month, in October, eh? Anyway, today, let’s discuss Casper.

Plot: After heiress Carrigan (Cathy Moriarity) gets a will to Whiplash Manor in Friendship, Maine, she is convinced by ghost Casper (Malachi Pearson) to contact ghost therapist, Dr. James Harvey (Bill Pullman) to come to the mansion, and investigate, as the manor is occupied by Casper, and other ghosts. Though Harvey, and his daughter, Kat (Christina Ricci) are initially frightened of the ghosts that live there, will they warm up to the ghost occupants, and/or convince other humans to warm up to them, while trying to prevent Carrigan, and her lawyer, Dibs (Eric Idle) from grabbing a treasure that’s hidden in the manor?

Well, though this was a story about ghosts, this film knows how to make things fun for its audience, all audiences, kids, teens, and adults, alike. Still, there were some issues that the film, Casper, had. For one, there were some moments that didn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense, especially when it came to some of the characters making decisions that didn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense. This film did also have a couple plot holes in it as well. In addition to this, the film had an ending that, though alright, felt kind of rushed, and kind of lame. Finally, as far as flaws go, Casper’s uncles, though funny at times, can also come off as a little too mean-spirited, and cynical at times.

Now, what makes this film a fun watch? Well, there’s the score by James Horner. Okay, first of all, be it family films like An American, or Balto (which came out the same year as this one), or more adult ones like Braveheart, Horner, like other composers such as Hans Zimmer, John Williams, or composers like those, knows how to make such great, and memorable movie scores. Casper’s no exception. I’m not sure how often he’s won Golden Globes, or Oscars, for Best Original Score. Well, if he never did, then he should have, because his scores hardly, if ever, disappoint. Here, in Casper, it’s probably the more quiet, and peaceful moments in which James Horner’s score especially seems to shine. Then, there’s the acting. Wow, the acting is awesome, especially from Bill Pullman, and Christina Ricci. It was also cool to see other actors like Don Novello, and Dan Akroyd, who made a cameo appearance as one of the Ghostbusters in this film, Eric Idle, and Cathy Moriarity, appear in this film too. Additionally, there was the story. Again, though there were some flaws in its story, like the couple plot holes, and things like that, there was still plenty of heart to it. Honestly, because of how strong, and engaging it is overall, this film may be one of the more underrated films of the 1990s, maybe even underrated period. It is also really hilarious. Honestly, even if all the characters end up being hilarious at different points in the films, it is really Casper’s uncles, Stretch, Stinkie, and Fatso, that really being out the comedy in this film. Speaking of comedy, there is plenty of comedy to behold in this film. Really the dark moments of this movie are balanced out by the more lighthearted comedic moments. And yeah, this film is filled with a roller coaster of emotions like comedy, sadness, bittersweet moments, you name it. Oh, did I forget to mention that this film has some rather clever jokes? If so, then that’s another thing to like about this film. Finally, Casper is likable, and memorable not only for being a fun, and memorable character, but also for being kind, humble, and willing to sacrifice for the needs of others whenever necessary.

And that’s my review for Casper. Wow, after rewatching this film sometime between 20, and 30 years later after last seeing it maybe as a kid, or teenager, I am surprised by how much of an enjoyable film that it actually is. Sure, again this film has its flaws, like plot holes, and probably an ending that could have been handled better, and things like that. Still, this Casper is a fun watch, and a must see. If you haven’t seen Casper anytime between 1995, and now, this is one that you need to see soon. And hey, if that means seeing it this month, with it being Halloween, then all the more reason to see it. So, definitely see Casper! You’ll have fun with it, and I’m sure.

Final Rating: 8.5/10

P.S. And now, for my 749th review, and then the milestone, my 750th review!

Everyone, in honor of the Tron becoming a trilogy as of this Friday, we review the one that started this franchise over 40 years ago, including the sequel that would come out almost 30 years after this very first film. Presenting to you all my review of the very first film, from 1982, the one, and only Tron.

Plot: When ENCOM programmer Alan Bradley (Bruce Boxleitner) discovers that he, and a bunch of employees unable to have access to future, he discovers that the senior vice president Ed Dillinger (David Warner) have been illegally misappropriating businesses, he, and his girlfriend, Dr. Lora Barnes (Cindy Morgan), go to video game developer Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges). They discover that Kevin is trying to tap into ENCOM’s business to try to find proof of this. Now, when the three of them successfully get themselves into the video game, known as TRON, can they, through creative means, find proof of Ed’s illegal activity once and for all?

Well, I will say that this was a very interesting premise. I mean to have the storyline set up in a really cool, and creative way, that was awesome. Having parallels between the real world, and the video game arcade world was also well set up too. The world building of Tron was also real cool too, from the set up of the suits, the motorcycle-like objects that characters of the Tron game would ride on, and more, was all really cool too. The characters were also very good too, heroes, and villains alike. One villain in particular had a really cool design. Oh, and did I forget to mention the score in this film? That was really good too, especially for its time. Wendy Carlos composed that in this case. She did well of making a great 80s vibe in the score. That was great co spidering this film came out in the 1980s. Additionally, the acting was great too. It was great to especially see Jeff Bridges in his younger years playing a younger character. And just think, he would voice another character in the animated fantasy film, The Last Unicorn (which, apparently, was released four months after this film). Finally, as far as positives go, this film does well with teaching valuable lessons, most notably when it comes to not being afraid to stand up for good, and helping to bring things done in darkness to light.

Still, the one downside would be that the visuals are dated, and likely made this film a little ahead of its time. Yes, same can be said about films like the original Star Wars trilogy, and movies like those. Even so, something about the visuals of Tron seemed to make it feel like a direct to video kind of film at least in some ways. Maybe I need to rewatch this film a few more times to see if I might be wrong about that? You got me!

And that’s my review for the original Tron film. Despite the visuals feeling dated, this film is very enjoyable for its creative premise, fun characters, heroes, and villains alike, and more. I would say that especially if you’ve already seen 2010’s Tron:Legacy, as well as plan to see the upcoming Tron: Ares, then definitely go back, and see this original 1982 film, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9/10

Well, everyone, today, we review one of the very first major animated films to be released in theaters by a Christian company by the name of the Salvation Poem Project. How about theatrical film being released by that company, eh? And just think, this is the second animated film released in theaters this year alone, after The Kings Of Kings. Anyway, with all of that said, let’s discuss the one, and only Light Of The World.

Plot: The film centers on the Apostle John (Benjamin Jacobson), his brother James (Dylan Leonard), and Jesus (Ian Hanlin), along with the other disciples, as Jesus is baptized just John The Baptist/Baptizer (Jesse Inocalla), begins His public ministry, and many other events occur in this adaptation of the life of Jesus that is mostly based on the Gospel of John.

So, before we dive into this review, I want you all to know that one of the animators that helped work on this film, Tony Bancroft, used to work for Disney. As a matter of fact, he helped work on Disney films like 1994’s The Lion King, and was one of two directors that directed 1998’s Mulan. Anyway, below is a link to a video in which Tony explains why he left Disney to go work with Salvation Poem Project! Now, onto the review itself!

https://youtu.be/LfklZ7HufDM

With all of that said, how was this adaptation of either the Gospel of John, or any of the other three Gospels? Well, actually, it was a very good film. Sure, in some ways, The King Of Kings, which, of course, was released earlier this year, might have done the story justice a little better. In others, however, Light Of The World was the one to do things better. That being said, what makes Light Of The World good? Well, first of all, even if, like other adaptations of an event, be it a historical event recorded in the Bible, or from a point in history period, takes some liberties, it remains a very faithful adaptation as well. Whether it’s keeping Andrew, and Peter as brothers, or John, and James as brothers, incorporating many of the miracles that Jesus performed in this movie, and more, Light Of The World does well with retelling what is in fact the greatest story ever told. Again, yes, there were liberties, and artistic licenses taken in the process of making this film. And yeah, maybe because of reasons like the Apostle John being portrayed as a teenager in this version, Light Of The World can have the feel of older animated films like Aladdin for instance. Still, especially for kids that may not be as familiar with the Gospels, they will likely be more curious about it after seeing this film. In addition to this, even if Light Of The World may feel geared a little more to kids, and maybe even teenagers, with this one feeling more like a coming of age story, adults will still find themselves enjoying this movie too, especially if they’re Christians, and are especially familiar with the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Honestly, considering that Tony Bancroft was one of the people that was involved with this film, and he used to work for Disney, it’s easy to see why this film was as good as it was. Would this film have seen the light of day if neither he, nor his brother, Tom Bancroft, who was one of the directors of this movie, become part of the Salvation Poem Project? Maybe, maybe not! Still, again, with Tom Bancroft being one of two directors, along with John J. Schafer, at the helm of this animated project, it’s most definitely a miracle that this film was very good. Now, how was the animation? Well, though it may not have always been great, it was very good. There were times in the film where the animation made this film feel like it was made more for a TV show, or series. However, there were more times when you can tell that the animation made this film feel like it was made more for theaters. I mean the way that say the Holy Spirit descending upon Jesus, for instance, or the way that the Apostles being filled with the Holy Spirit was depicted, for instance, that aspect of the animation was like, wow. Yeah, wow, is what I have to say. Same goes for lighter scenes like Jesus being baptized by John, Peter walking on the water, or even darker scenes like Jesus in the Garden Of Gethsemane, His crucifixion, and scenes like those. And what’s even more is that the animation here truly helps depict the good versus evil that was shown throughout this film. I’m not sure how to fully explain it, except that it helped depict Jesus’ love for others, His miracles, and even the darkness going on within the hearts of people like Caiaphas, and many of the religious leaders. Then, there’s the characters. Man, they are done really well. Whether it’s John, and the Apostles, Marys like Mary the mother of Jesus, or Mary Magdalene, Caiphas, Joseph Of Arimathea, and Nicodemus, three of the religious leaders, John the Baptizer, and, of course, Jesus Himself, though maybe some of them could have been fleshed out as much others, they are overall done very well. Another thing to like is the score by Alex McKenzie. Man, his score is really good. He truly did seem to understand what music was, and likely still is, like in places of the Middle East like Israel, because he really helps capture the culture of the nation. I mean the fact that this film doesn’t even have any songs in it, except for one during the credits, that is really good. I mean seeing as many animated films are made into musicals (which, I’m usually a sucker for those), this film didn’t go in that direction, and it definitely worked out for the best in this case. Instead, we just have a movie with all dialogue, and really good instrumental pieces that play throughout the course of this film. Finally, whether you’ve read the Gospels, or not, there are some valuable lessons to take away from this film. I mean there were even some lessons that I don’t recall hearing, or learning from any of the Bible, but was glad to hear about in this film, and, I’m sure other people will be glad to take away after seeing this film.

The only other flaw I will say there may be to this film, besides some of the animation being a little weird for a theatrical release at times, and some of the characters not being quite as well fleshed out as others would be that this film probably could have been an extra ten minutes longer, if not more. That way this film probably might not have potentially come off as a little fast-paced at times.

And that’s my review for Light Of The World. Honestly, seeing as this was about the life, and death, and resurrection of Jesus, I’m not sure that releasing it around September was the best idea. Personally, I think the filmmakers should have waited until maybe around Easter of next year, 2026, to release it. It’s just tragic that this film wasn’t much more popular either because of it not being promoted as much as it should have been, or some other reason. Seeing as this film seemed to bomb, it’s too bad that we may not see another Bible-themed film from Salvation Poem Project. But I hope I’m wrong about that. I do hope that the company will still release more projects that are Biblically based, and do a better job of promoting them. But we shall see. Even if this film could have been a little better, still go see it. You’ll still be glad to have seen it, and wish that it was more popular. And yeah, with the studio having a couple former Disney animators included in the mix, hopefully any future animated films that might come out from Salvation Poem Project will get better from here! So again, definitely go see it, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 8.5/10

And now, everyone, today, we review a classic film that captured, and scared everyone when it hit theaters fifty years ago. Apparently, it was Steven Spielberg’s first big debut. Oh, and it was just re-released in theaters in honor of it reaching its 50th anniversary. So now, let’s discuss the one, and only Jaws.

Plot: When Chief officer Martin Brody (Roy Scheider) observes that a tiger shark has been attacking people on the shores of Amity Island, New England, it is up to him, along with an oceanographer named Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss), and a sailor named Quint (Robert Shaw) to hunt, and take down the shark once and for all.

Okay, so the PG-13 rating didn’t come out until 1984, nine years after this film’s release, am I right? If that is the case, then I’m sure that has this film been released around then, or shortly after, I’m sure it would probably have been given that rating instead of the PG rating that it currently has. There is plenty of violence from beginning to end. Okay, not to the point where it should have been given the R-rating. Still, Jaws is nonetheless very intense. Also, side note, I was surprised to hear that this movie was Steven Spielberg’s big debut. Anyway, to a degree, Jaws almost felt similar to films like The Ghost & The Darkness. Very interesting, considering that, one, that film came out 21 years after Jaws, in 1996, two, that film had two lions working in a pack to attack people in a region of Africa, instead of a shark attacking people on a beach, and, three, The Ghost & The Darkness was based on a true story, while Jaws was just a work of fiction. Anyway, the musical score was really good too. The score was done by music legend John Williams. Wow, and this film was released two years before the beginning of the Star Wars trilogy that he also composed for, and then sometime way before the Star Wars prequel trilogy got released as well. Additionally, this film does well with developing its characters really well. I mean you have characters with some common sense when it comes to both good, and dangerous situations, and you have ones that are so stubborn that they’re not willing to listen to good advice of others. Seeing as that was life back then, and is the case even now, it was good how this film portrayed that aspect. The acting was really great too. I mean having characters like Chief Martin Brody being played by Roy Scheider, or the oceanographer, Matt Hooper, being played by a young Richard Dreyfuss at the time, that was great too. Anyway, there is lots of action in this film too. Yeah, that’s the case more so when the shark’s onscreen, but still. That is another thing. Finally, while there is plenty of action, the movie does a great job of slowing down when it needs to have the more slow, and quiet moments.

If there was one thing that might have been negative, it would probably be that this film might have been a little more violent than it needed to be. While this film did need to do well with showing how brutal, and cruel a situation like that can be, it also probably could have scaled back a little bit more in that regard.

And that’s my review for Jaws. Sorry that it took me a long while to finally get to seeing this film. Well, hey, seeing it being re-released for it’s 50th anniversary was certainly the perfect opportunity for me to do so. I would say that if you still want to see it, and are okay with a film with lots of intense moments, then I would say go for seeing it, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 9.5/10

And now, today, we review what is a continuation of an animated film that was released 3-3 1/2 years ago. It is the one, and only, The Bad Guys 2, the sequel to the 2022 hit animated film.

Plot: Going from a life of crime to learning to do good deeds was just the beginning for the title characters. This time, Mr. Wolf (Sam Rockwell), Mr. Snake (Marc Martin), and the gang now try to live new lives, trying to get better jobs, and doing whatever it takes to stay out of the life of crime for good, but to no avail. But when the gang comes across a new group of female animal criminals that consists of the leader, a snow leopard named Kitty Kat (Danielle Brooks), and her henchmen, a wild boar named Pigtail Petrova (Maria Bakalova), and a raven named Doom/Susan (Natasha Lyonne), this gang, known as the Bad Girls, offer the now Good Guys a chance to get back in their former criminal ways by helping them pull off a very dangerous heist. Now, the question remains, will the Good Guys reform to the life of crime, or will they remember the valuable lessons that were taught by their mentor, Governor Diane Foxington (Zazie Beetz), and stop the Bad Girls from carrying out their plan?

First of all, seeing that characters like Wolf, Snake, these characters are ones that are more often than not portrayed as villains in many other films, how could we not appreciate the fact that characters like these are being portrayed in a more positive light in both this film, and its predecessor, The Bad Guys 1? Second, The Bad Guys 2 does an excellent job of doing what a good sequel needs to do, making it improve, and expand on its characters, storyline, world building, and more. You know, correct me if I’m likely wrong, but it seems like DreamWorks has made a great track record of making their sequels as good, oftentimes even better than, their predecessor (case in point, 2011’s Kung Fu Panda 2, or 2022’s Puss In Boots: The Last Wish). The Bad Guys 2 is certainly no exception. Also, like many of DreamWorks’ more recent animated films, The Bad Guys 2 has a really great animation style. Like animated films such as Spider-Man: Into The Spiderverse, The Bad Guys 1, or Puss In Boots: The Last Wish, for instance, The Bad Guys 2 does a brilliant of somehow blending the styles of 3D, and 2D animation with each other really well. Side note, rumor has it that the upcoming Disney/Pixar film, Gatto (which will apparently be coming out in June 2027), will be attempting this style of animation as well. Can that film pull it off the same way that Sony Animation, and DreamWorks Animation has in more recent years? Well, we shall see come less than two years from now. Anyway, back to talking about The Bad Guys 2! As mentioned moments ago, the characters are more developed this time around. It is surprising as to how this is the case especially for Wolf, and Diane Foxington. The new villains were also very good. This sequel also ups the stakes real high this time around. I mean there’s more action, more grit, and it seems surprisingly a little more darker this time around. Yet, it also does well balancing out its darker tone with it it’s more lighthearted comedic tone. Man, somewhat typical DreamWorks, eh? I think other animation companies like Sony Animation, and even Disney could learn from DreamWorks. Oh, and did I forget to mention that, at times, The Bad Guys 2 seems to have the feel of action films like Mission Impossible, Fast & The Furious, or ones like those? I’m sure that even adults will enjoy this film, and sequel, all the more because of that. Finally, The Bad Guys seems to act like a fable in terms of providing lessons for people of all ages. This is especially the case with an evil character basically saying to one of the good ones that it’s hopeless to do what’s right, and that doing bad things is the way to go. Seeing as the devil will try to brainwash even Christians with lies such as that, this helped make this film even better.

If there were any negatives in this sequel, they would be that one, there were a couple plot holes in this film. Also, as far as the new villains go, even though they were fairly well developed ones, we probably couldn’t have had more screen time with them. Should they appear in the third film, hopefully we’ll get to see more of them. But we shall see.

And that’s my review for The Bad Guys 2. Honestly, this is one of the rare to fewer times that many people will probably like this sequel more than its predecessor. The animation is awesome, the story, though simple, is also really engaging from beginning to end, the comedy, and darker tone balance each other out well, and the characters are more well done this time around. And, yes, let’s not forget the valuable lessons that are to be gained from The Bad Guys 2. Truly, this is one that needs to be viewed on the big screen before video. So, if it’s still playing at a theater near you, and you can afford it, go see it! It’s definitely worth your time to be sure.

Final Rating: 9/10

Everyone, today, we review the latest reboot of the Fantastic Four series. It is the one, and only The Fantastic Four: First Steps.

Plot: When the Fantastic Four team (Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Joseph Quinn respectively) are informed by an outsider named Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) that Earth is going to be consumed by a gigantic cosmic being named Galactus (Ralph Ineson), it is up to the unique heroes to stop him from carrying out his plan, and save the world, and likely even the Galaxy once and for all?

Well, I’m sure you’re all wondering, is The Fantastic Four: First Steps one of the better films from Marvel? Well, though it probably wouldn’t likely be a masterpiece by any means, it is still very fun. The fact that this film took liberties in terms of making the four main characters people with superpowers while they were in outer space, that was very creative. It was also interesting to see this Marvel film likely have a mixture of elements from films like Spider-Man, Iron Man, and maybe even Star Wars. The action was also really good. The designs were also really great, first of all from all four of the Fantastic Four characters. Second, the designs of the villains were great too. Shalla-Bal/Silver Surfer was cool looking. What’s even more is that her backstory was very interesting. But probably one of the more awesome designs was that of Galactus. Seeing him with this alien like design, as well as this being that one needed to be brave enough to try to deal with, that was something. But honestly, one of the best things to appreciate about The Fantastic Four: First Steps was that the Fantastic Four, as a whole, were willing to do anything, and everything to keep their family safe, while trying to save the world, especially Mr., and Mrs. Fantastic. Finally, how could you not love that this film tried to combine the era of the 1960s with futuristic elements in the process?

However, this film was a little weird at times too. First of all, this film did seem to have some plot holes here, and there. Second, there was character development that seemed to feel a little rushed for one, or two characters. There was also a scene that occurs near the end that didn’t seem to work as well as it probably should have. I remember thinking that it felt a little random what it was. Hopefully that’s enough for me to mention without spoiling the film. And, overall, the film seemed to be filled with quite a few cliches, and it kind of keeps the characters, and film, overall, from being more likable, and memorable.

And that’s my review for The Fantastic Four: First Steps. Though I wouldn’t necessarily say that Marvel is fully back on their feet yet, there are some signs that, either because of newer leadership, or other factors, they are in a better place than they were a few years ago. The film does still serve as proof that Disney, and Marvel are definitely trying to get back to their groove. Will they get there? Well, despite this film’s flaws, it also shows that there likely is still hope that Marvel will make a comeback hopefully sooner rather than later. That being said, if you want a film in which Marvel has made a better especially better than ones like The Eternals, for instance, then all the more reason to go, and see it. There is still fun to be had in this film, and you’ll have a very good time. So yeah, go see it, and see what you think!

Final Rating: 8.5/10

Ladies, and gentlemen, today we review a sequel to what may be a classic remake of an older live-action Disney film. Not only that, but this sequel was given a release over 20 years after the version that starred Jamie Lee Curtis, and Lindsay Lohan, first premiered. So, without further ado, here is my review for the one, and only sequel to 2003’s Freaky Friday, simply titled Freakier Friday.

Plot: Twenty-two years after the events of the first film, Anna Coleman (Lindsay Lohan) is now a single parent to her daughter, Harper (Julia Butters). One day, when Harper gets in trouble with her new chemistry partner, Lily Reyes (Sophia Hammons), both are sent to the principal’s office, resulting in Anna meeting Lily’s father, Eric (Manny Jacinto). Six months later, after Anna, and Eric get engaged, a psychic named Madame Jen (Vanessa Bauer) that attends Anna’s bachelorette party has a meeting with Tess (Jamie Lee Curtis), and Anna that causes an earthquake that very evening that only they, along with Harper, and Lily, can feel. The next morning, Anna, and Harper switch bodies with each other, along with Tess, and Lily with each other. Now, just Anna, and Tess did before, can Anna, and Harper, along with Tess, and Lily learn to walk in each other’s shoes before Anna, and Eric get married? In fact, will Anna, and Eric still successfully get married in spite of this hardship that Anna, Tess, Harper, and Lily are going through?

Now, as I’m sure many of us know, the previous film, Freaky Friday, was released back in 2003. Oh, and by the way, side note, for those of you that don’t know, I did rewatch Freaky Friday, and reviewed that one recently. So if you haven’t checked that one out, and then come back and check out this review for the sequel. Anyway, with this sequel coming out twenty-two years later, the question remains, was it worth the wait? Did we need this sequel? Or was this one pointless? Well, let me put it to you all this way! We didn’t necessarily need Freakier Friday. That being said, however, it doesn’t mean that this sequel was horrible, nor does it fall into the category of one like Toy Story 4 by making the audience wish that this sequel never existed. Instead, Freakier Friday falls more along the lines of Toy Story 1, or 2, Mary Poppins Returns, or Mufasa: The Lion King, for instance, in that, though this sequel wasn’t needed, it was really cool to have. I mean you can tell that Disney tried to make a mostly, if not fully, well-crafted sequel. Plus, once again, there’s hardly any woke content in here. So isn’t that nice too!?! It would seem that Disney has finally been learning to not cater to specific groups of people. I would say that if Disney continues to keep this up, then there may yet be hope that families will flock back to theaters to see Disney hopefully return to wholesome entertainment once again. Anyway, one of the things that makes this sequel good is that, though it may not be quite as good as the 2003 predecessor, you can tell that the filmmakers were trying to honor that predecessor as much as possible. For one, the fact that Disney was willing to wait this long to make a sequel, instead of making a whole new one regardless of whether or not they’d have the same actors, or actresses, that is most definitely saying something right there. Well, I’m delighted to tell you all that not only do we have new characters, and, therefore, new actors, but we have all of the same actors from 2003’s Freaky Friday returning for their respective roles. I mean you not only have Jamie Less Curtis, and Lindsay Lohan returning as Tess, and Anna respectively, but you even have Ryan Malgarini coming back as Anna’s brother Harry, Chad Michael Murray as Jake, Anna’s now ex-boyfriend, for some reason in this sequel, and even Mark Harmon as Ryan, Tess’ husband, for example. Then you have some of the newer cast like Julia Butters as Anna’s daughter Harper, Manny Jacinto as Eric Reyes, Anna’s fiancee, Sophia Hammons as Lily, Eric’s daughter, and more joining for this sequel. Now, how about the storyline? Well, even though, in some ways, Freakier Friday might feel somewhat like a beat by beat imitation of Freaky Friday, it also does a fairly good job of going in a newer direction as well. First of all, the film is very funny. The newer characters are also very memorable. As for the storyline, again, you’ll be glad that it goes in a fairly newer direction. People might think it could be predictable, and could go along a route of other films outside the Freaky Friday franchise (i.e. something like The Parent Trap). Thankfully, however, this sequel doesn’t end up being quite that predictable. And what’s more, there are more emotions Inception this film, from comedy, heartfelt, and sad moments, and other ingredients that help make a good sequel. And what’s more is that the audience can gain some valuable from the main characters of this sequel, both the old, and newer ones. Finally, did I forget to mention that though there may be one, or two inappropriate jokes in this sequel, at least there aren’t any scenes that borderline inappropriate? Seeing as that seemed to be the case for the 2003 film, that was a nice, and welcome change as well.

And that’s my review for Freakier Friday. Though it may not have necessarily have been needed, at least it went a newer direction than one might have expected. It’s fun, the cast is awesome, and the storyline is still really enjoyable. I would say that if you haven’t seen Freakier Friday, but have at least seen Freaky Friday, then definitely see it. That is especially if you want to see a sequel that clearly tries to honor the 2003 film as much as possible. Well, that being said, definitely see it, and see what you think!

Final Rating:9.5/10