Well, everyone, this is it. As of now, we are now one review away from my 600th movie review (which I may not get to until sometime next week). In the meantime, to close out on the reviews that were in the 500s, we now review a film that is based on a true story. Not only that, but it is based on the life of well-known wrestler champion George Foreman. So now, let’s discuss Big George Foreman: The Miraculous Story Of The Once And Future Heavyweight Champion Of The World.
Plot: The film centers around the life of George Foreman (Khris Davis) and how he rose to power as a wrestler, and later became a preacher.
So, for a film that’s a biopic, did they do a good job with this film? Well, I don’t know how much was left out of this film that was a depiction of some of George Foreman’s life. However, it would seem that they covered a great plenty that needed to be shown for audiences in nationwide, and worldwide. I mean the fact that film companies like Affirm Films are mainstream, and have succeeded in the past in making, and coming out with films like Soul Surfer, Courageous, War Room, Miracles From Heaven, and now George Foreman: The Miraculous Story Of The Once And Future Heavyweight Champion, among other films, that is most definitely a miracle in of itself that Christian films have been successfully produced, and even making first to theaters before video, and On Demand. That is especially since more people have become hostile towards Christians, and anything associated with Christianity like Christian-themed films, and things like those, you know? Anyway, even though we don’t get to know many of George Foreman’s family members, at least we still get to dive into some of George Foreman’s childhood, why he became the boxing champion, his steps to becoming a preacher, and more. It really did help develop his character in this film. Khris Davis truly did pull off playing this role, and trying to truly fill the shoes of this real-life person. Now, obviously, we know that no can truly fill the shoes of another person, dead or alive. Still, one can still get a good feeling, and idea about how another person acted, or felt about situations, their outlook on things in life, and/or life in general, and things like that. That’s exactly what actor Khris Davis did well with accomplishing when trying to play the role of a person like George Foreman. Anyway, for those of you who aren’t familiar with George Foreman’s journey in his life, this film is definitely a great way for anyone to know about it. Is it possible that they may have left some things out? Sure. Still, this is a film. And yeah, they can only include so much in a film. Could the filmmakers have made this film longer by making it around 2.5-3 hours? Maybe! And yeah, we could have perhaps gotten to know more of George’s childhood, and learned more of his family. However, since George Foreman is more of a famous person, and this film itself has come out, at least this film could likely pique people’s curiosity more as to what life was like for his siblings, his mother, and things like that. Not to mention that George Foreman is still alive. So at least we can ask him personally what it actually was like to go through that. So how about that? Additionally, it was very interesting to see some of the history of George Foreman’s life, and to start off going into things like boxing for the wrong reasons, and then become a Christian, and have a better outlook on life, and making decisions more for the right reasons. Yes, he may have made mistakes after becoming a Christian, like we all have since, well, we’re all human, and no human that has walked this Earth has been perfect, again, except for Jesus Christ. However, at least George Foreman serves as a living example as to why we don’t need to let our past failures define us, and only need to let Jesus define us no matter what. Anyway, when it came to George naming his kids, and things like that, let’s just say that you’d be surprised as to how he handled a situation like that. Finally, the theme of letting God be in control of our lives, and making decisions for the right reasons, and not the wrong ones end up being very powerful, and I’m sure will continue to remain true.
And that’s my review for George Foreman: The Miraculous Story Of The Once And Future Heavyweight Champion Of The World. Yeah, I mean whether some of us grew up hearing about George Foreman years ago, and seeing him in wrestling, and more, or are learning about him for the very first time by seeing films such as this one, this film is most definitely a must watch. Why this film has not gained more popularity yet is mind boggling. Maybe not too mind boggling, since not nearly as many Christian-themed films have been released as of recently. Well, not in the mainstream media, or even in theaters. Regardless, this is most definitely a must-see. It has heart, it does well with showing much of what life was like for George Foreman growing up, and the movie can help us truly think critically about life, and how we should handle situations in life. Quite frankly, I hope that even non-Christians will give this film, and maybe they can be touched by it, and become Christians themselves. Well, again, a film like this, among other tools, serve as proof that God works in mysterious ways . One way, or another, definitely make it a point to see this film. It may be over two hours long. However, it is worth sitting though 129 minutes, or less to see this movie. You will be glad that you saw this film in the end. So, go see it if you can! You’ll be glad that you did in the end.
Well, everyone, welcome back to yet another session of movie reviewing! Today, we are going to be reviewing a film that is evidently based on a book series by book author Judie Blume. Not only that, but the first of this book series was apparently written over fifty years ago, in 1970. So now, over fifty years later, we have the first of this book series adapted into film, and set in 1970. Oh, and did I forget to mention that this film stars Rachel McAdams, Kathy Bates, and Abby Ryder Fortson, among some others? Well, with all that being said, let’s discuss the film, “Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret”.
Plot: Set in 1970, a pre-teen named Margaret Simon (Abby Ryder Fortson), and her parents end up moving from New York City to a suburb in New Jersey. After settling in, making some new friends, and more, her 6th grade teacher assigns her, and the class a year-long research project. This prompts her to explore other religions by going to services like a Jewish one at her grandmother’s synagogue, going to a Nativity mass with a friend of hers, and more. As she does this project, will she realize why she believes in God, or will this affect her relationship with God, and draw her away from Him in the end?
Now, the question remains, did this film remain faithful to it’s source material, or the first part of it? Well, I have never personally read the source material. So, I can’t vouch for that yet. However, as far as a film goes without comparing it to the book, it’s still very good. First of all, you have to give this film credit for rating this film PG-13. I mean yeah, it can feel like more like kids/family film at times. However, because this film had talked about more mature topics like puberty, a female having her period, and things like that, it was probably for the best that this film was given the rating that it had in the end. Quite honestly, I was kind of surprised to find that the book ended up being controversial, due to it being a middle school novel that also talked about these rather heavy subjects. Anyway, the cast was phenomenal, from Abby Ryder Fortson as the main character, Margaret, to Rachael McAdams as her mother, Benny Safdie as her husband, Herb, Kathy Bates as Margaret’s grandmother, and more. Honestly, you can tell that each person had so much fun with their respective roles. The movie can help younger people, especially those in middle, high school, or even younger kids that see this film, really think about life in general, especially when it comes to learning how to handle social situations. It was also great to see a film that featured kids learning to fit in, and sometimes may even struggle with their faith in God from time to time. I mean to have God included in a mainstream media film, especially nowadays, that is great that we can still films like those even in theaters. Oh, and the movie does a fantastic job of demonstrating why religion doesn’t work. Yes, the Book Of James portrays religion in a positive light by saying that true good religion is helping orphans, and widows, and things like that. Anyway, the movie does deal with hard issues like forgiveness to those that hurt us, reconciliation, and quite a few other things as well. It’s also great to have a film in which each of the characters feels genuine, and real.
If there were any negatives about this film, it would be that, one, there were some scenes that felt a little corny, and stupid at times. Also, the ending may have ended a little too abruptly. Thankfully, with those being the only complaints, that doesn’t keep this film from being enjoyable overall.
And that concludes my review for Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret. It is great to see a film that remains faithful to the book, and doesn’t add any unnecessary elements that might cause some people to not want to see it. Yes, there are some heavy subjects covered in this film, like the ones that I mentioned before. Still, because of the fact that God is talked about in this film, the characters being well developed, the storyline being mostly well done, and other things too, you will definitely not want to miss it. Trust me, after you see it, I can guarantee you’ll be glad that you did. So go see Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret., and see what you think!
Well, everyone, welcome to yet another session of movie reviewing. Today, we are going to be reviewing a sports drama film that was based on actual events centering around what would be future basketball player at the time Michael Jordan, and his family, and businessman Sonny Vaccaro. Oh, and did I forget to mention that this was directed by actor, and now, director Ben Affleck? Either way, let’s discuss the movie, known as Air.
Plot: The film depicts how, back in 1984, Nike, Inc. was on the verge of closing down their shoe division, due to low sales. But businessman Sonny Vaccaro (Matt Damon) came up with the idea of making a special show for young Michael Jordan (Damian Delano Young), and help make him a better basketball runner, and player, while also trying to save his company, despite facing many impossible odds to do so. Did his plan succeed in the end?
Now, I know what you all may be thinking. Oh, boy, another sports film in which a miracle happened in sports like with Remember The Titans, Miracle, of films like those. Okay, this may be a film that was based on true events, and things like that. However, what makes this film stand out among films like those is that instead of players playing sports, for the most part, we get to have a businessman like Sonny Vaccaro, and a person like Michael Jordan both be involved in this film. I won’t give away what all occurred that this film was based on. However, let’s just say that I was surprised to hear that the events that occurred in this film seemed to help Michael Jordan become a great professional basketball player. Also, it was great to see a movie that took place during a time when people in the business world seemed to have more honesty, and integrity than businessmen of today. Oh, and it was great to see how people like Sonny seemed to be so optimistic about situations that they were willing to go the distance, so to speak, in those cases, despite hearing a lot of naysayers in the process. The acting was also great from Matt Damon as the main character, Sonny, Ben Affleck (who, of course, also directed this film) as Sonny’s boss, Phil Knight, Damian Delano Young as young Michael Jordan, and more. Each of their performances were top notch. Additionally, if you want a little bit of history into Michael Jordan’s you get gears, then all the more reason to see this film. Yes, the film may focus more on Sonny, and the events going on in the Nike business. Still, this film does dive a least at little bit into Michael Jordan’s childhood. So that was cool.
And that’s my review for Air. Honestly, if you’re a big sports person who wants to see a movie about some of the history of Nike, Inc., or some of Michael Jordan, and maybe more, then all the more reason to see this film. The character development is great, the story is very different from your unique sports film that is based on true events, and, of course, the acting is really good. So definitely see Air, whenever you can. It is most definitely worth seeing.
Well, everyone, today, we shall dive into the world of animation for the first time in a while since, well, we last did so back in January with the two Puss In Boots films. No, it won’t be a DreamWorks films this time around. This time, we will be discussing an animated film from the animation company, Universal, and Illumination. And not only that, but we will be reviewing the newest full length feature that could potentially be revolutionary for the company. No, not because this is the first animated film from the company. That was of course Despicable Me from 2010. No, this film seems to be revolutionary for a couple different reasons. One being that it’s based on a video game franchise that has spanned around the past 3-4 decades. The other being that the company has supposedly decided, according to word of mouth, that if this new film were to be successful, it may give Universal, and Illumination reason to team up with Nintendo, and make more animated films based on some of Nintendo’s beloved video games. So now, with all of that said, let’s discuss a film that’s based on the Super Mario Bros. video game franchise, The Super Mario Bros. Movie.
Plot: When plumbers Mario (Chris Pratt), and his brother, Luigi (Charlie Day) get sucked out of their home world of New York City, and into a fantasy world that includes places like the Mushroom Kingdom, and the Dark Lands, they then find themselves involved in a plot by Bowser (Jack Black), King of the Koopas, to take over the Mushroom Kingdom, which is ruled by the beautiful Princess Peach (Anna Taylor-Joy). Now, with the help of the Princess, and her group of little people called Toads, can Mario, Luigi, and the gang put a stop to Bowser’s diabolical plot before it’s too late?
Well, as I’m sure some of us know, this film has been making bank over the past couple weeks already, going so far as making not $100 million, not $200 million, but over $400 million in the first couple weeks. And that’s surprisingly just domestically. Yeah, how often have you heard of that at least with an animated film? That being said, are the box office numbers for this film justified? Well, let me put it to you all this way. The Super Mario Bros. Movie is a good film, no doubt about it. Still, in some aspects, this film may be a little overrated. But more on that later.
First of all, let’s talk about the good things about this film. To start things off, there is the animation for this film. Wow, let me just say that if you end up being one of those people who doesn’t like anything else about this film, you’ll for sure love the animation. To start, the animation is gorgeous. It’s almost like the CGI animation looks very much the way it would look in a computer animated film. At the same time, however, the animation also looks the way it would in a Super Mario video game with the 3D graphics, but better. Both Universal/Illumination, and Nintendo knew how to be spot on when it came to their animation. What’s even better is that the characters are much better drawn, and designed than those from previous Universal/Illumination films. How so, you may be wondering? Well, you know how in previous Universal/Illumination films, many of the characters, especially humans, were designed with these somewhat skinny bodies, and their arms, and legs being so skinny that they’re like sticks? That is not the case this time around. Universal/Illumination, and Nintendo stuck very closely to the designs of characters like Mario, Luigi, Bowser, Peach, and Donkey Kong, and more. Yes, Peach was a little skinny, even with her legs, and possibly even her arms. But you know, it could have been worse, first off, and second, she’s already skinny enough in games like more recent Mario Kart games, and other Mario games like those. So her animation design is understandable because of that. Anyway, there is also the score for this film. Brian Tyler did the score for this film. He did well remaining faithful to putting in some of the musical score from the games that obviously helped most of those games become classics in the first place. I mean at one point, you even have a character play a piece of the Super Mario theme music on piano at one point for crying out loud. And yeah, you’ll feel nostalgia from hearing other classic pieces of Super Mario theme music throughout this film as well. Oh, and did I forget to mention the very good soundtrack for this film? Okay, yeah, there are maybe one, or two popular hit songs that may not have worked quite too well. However, for the majority that do work, they surprisingly do so brilliantly, sometimes even hilariously well. Then, there’s the comedy. Oh man, the comedy is genius, from certain lines, to some of the slapstick, and more. The Super Mario Bros. Movie may yet be one of the funnier films that Universal/Illumination has come out with yet, at least in addition to ones like Despicable Me, and Sing. There is also some really fun action in this film, especially around the middle, and near the end of this film. What’s more is that this film has very black, and white characters in terms of us knowing who the heroes truly are, and same with the villains. There’s no twist villain, or any of that stuff. It’s like the old days of either Disney, or even non-Disney animated films that tried to follow as closely to Disney’s guidelines for a good story as possible. Honestly, if companies like Universal/Illumination, and DreamWorks keep going that type of route, then hopefully even Disney will learn their lesson to go back to their roots in terms of what their animation company was founded on in the first place. That is since Disney has been inserting bull crap material with gay stuff, transgender things, and more that has caused films from other animation companies like The Super Mario Bros. Movie, or Puss In Boots: The Last Wish, for instance, to perform better than Disney films like Lightyear, and Strange World (both of which were released at different points last year), for example. In addition to all of this, most of the main characters are very well developed, especially Mario, Luigi, Peach, and the classic villain of this film, and the Mario games, Bowser. One of the characters surprisingly even has a backstory that, though it could have been a little better developed, was still fairly well written. And Bowser, he is such a great villain. Yeah, Universal/Illumination may have had decent, or good villains in the past, especially ones like Jimmy Crystal from Sing 2. However, with Bowser, the filmmakers went all out with this one. You really do love to hate this one. Also, along with villains like Jimmy Crystal, Bowser may be one of Universal/Illumination’s most memorable villains yet. Part of me was surprised to find that he was voiced by Jack Black of all people. Black did well with going from using his normal acting voice to developing a more deep, and menacing this time around. There’s also Kamek, who’s played by Kevin Michael Richardson, and serves as a sorcerer, and an advisor to Bowser. Though maybe not quite as funny as say a villain duo like Kronk, and Yzma from The Emperor’s New Groove, both Bowser, and Kamek still have a few hilarious moments here and there when onscreen together. Anyway, in addition to them, there’s also Chris Pratt, who voiced Mario. Sure, it may not be Charles Martinet voicing him, or even Luigi, like he has in the Mario video games in the past. But come on, for those of you who are up in arms about Charles Martinet not voicing either, or both characters, let’s remember a couple things. First of all, Charles Martinet is getting older, and his voice is likely changing somewhat as a result. Second of all, since this is a movie that we’re talking about, and not just another video game, it seems to make sense to have a known actor in the Hollywood movie world to play a character, wouldn’t you say? Just a thought! Plus, it’s probably nice to hear someone else voice the iconic brothers from the video game world for once, you know? There’s also Charlie Day as Luigi, and Anna Taylor-Joy. Speaking of the latter character, that’s another bonus for this film. For those of you who played especially some of the earlier Super Mario games, you know how Peach seemed to serve more of the damsel in distress role this time around? Well, prepare to either be happy, or disappointed, because she has more of a strong female role model this time around like strong female leads such as Mulan, or Moana, for instance. Yeah, not just being the Princess that needs to be rescued was a very welcome change for Princess Peach this time around. Oh, and how could I forget Keagan Michael-Key as Toad? He sure seemed to know how to sound like Toad, as it sounded more like Toad than Keagan, unlike some other films that he’s either played in, or done a voice role in. There’s also Seth Rogen as Donkey Kong. Yeah, considering the kind of character that Donkey Kong is, that role suits Rogen very well.
With all that said, what are the downsides to this film? Well, for one, there’s the pacing for this film. This film has a running time of 92 minutes. Honestly, this film probably should have had a running time of around 100-110, maybe even 110-120 minutes (I bring up the latter running time suggestion partially since, well, some of Disney/Pixar’s films had such a running time starting with The Incredibles, and onwards). Why? Well, the shorter 92-minute running time causes this film to have things, such as the world building, be less developed than it would be otherwise. I mean yes, we do get to see a lot of the Mushroom Kingdom, and the Dark Lands. However, aside from those, we don’t get to see much of places like the Ice Kingdom, where the penguins ruled, or the desert that we see at one point in this film, for example. Problems like this cause this film to have quite a few plot holes in the process. There’s also a lack of character development. Okay, yes, as I mentioned in the pros of this film, the main characters, like Mario, Luigi, Peach, Toad, and Bowser, that are very well developed. However, you have some of the secondary characters, like the penguins, and their King, some of the secondary villains, minus Kamek, and others that could have been fleshed out a little more. I did hear someone ask recently how you could develop characters that have already been well developed in games. Okay, yes, that person makes a good point. However, let’s also take into consideration the possibility that not everyone that sees this movie has played any of the Mario games. With that in mind, how do we know that those who haven’t played the Mario games are as likely to enjoy this film? Okay, maybe they will anyway, with many of the other good elements that are in this film. Still, just something to think about for future films that Universal/Illumination, and Nintendo might work together to make, you know? Oh, there was a character in this film that acted very mean spirited, similarly to the dad in the 2005 Disney film, Chicken Little. And for those of you who saw that film, you may recall how unlikable he was until around the very end. Same goes with the character that I mention for this animated film. This leads me to my final negative for The Super Mario Bros. Movie. There were a couple underdeveloped character arcs that could have likely been handled better, if this film had been longer than it was. Oh, and another thing! There was this corny song that Bowser sings at one point that, let’s just say that, though it may be hilarious for a few seconds, it could also come off as getting little grating on your nerves around the middle to end of the song as well. Yes, it’s still sort of funny at first, but it also may be a little too stupid , and annoying as well. Last, but not least, though there were some good messages about teamwork, not giving up, and things like those, there were also some messages that could likely come off as mixed ones in the end.
And that’s my review for The Super Mario Bros. Movie. For what we got with this film in the end, it was still very enjoyable. The movie did well with animating the characters well, along with the background, most of the main characters at least were developed well, the score was very good, some of the comedy was spot on, and the voice acting was very enjoyable. Yes, this film has it’s flaws, and could have been better because of that. Still, this film was their first try at making an animated film based on a video game franchise. For what they did, it’s still worth seeing. Still, in the future, if either Universal/Illumination, or even any other animation company were to team up with Nintendo to make a film based on a video game in the future, they should make that film longer than 90 minutes, and go maybe 100-110, or even 110-120 minutes if they want to have most characters of that film fleshed out, the world building as well developed as possible, and more. Well, again, for what this film is, it’s still worth seeing. So go see it, if you haven’t yet, and see what you think!
Well, everyone, welcome back to yet another session of movie reviewing! First of all, as you can see, we are now five reviews away from reaching the 600th film review mark. I won’t spoil what it is. But I hope you all enjoy what it ends up being in the end. Second, these next couple reviews will be based on games of some kind, one based on a popular board game, and the other on a popular video game. In this case, it’s the former. It is the one, and only Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves, based on the popular Dungeons & Dragons board game, and starring Chris Pine, Michelle Rodriguez, Hugh Grant, and more.
Plot: After thieves Edgin (Chris Pine), and his friend, Holga (Michelle Rodriguez) escape prison, they now must put their hope, and trust in some new recruits, including a sorceror named Simon (Justice Smith), and a female shape shifter named Doric (Sophia Lillis). Together, they must go rescue Edgin’s daughter, Kira (Chloe Coleman), and find a magical artifact that will supposedly bring back Edgin’s late wife. Will our heroes succeed in both missions?
I will say this, even though there were certain aspects of this world that could have been a little bit better, this film was, for the most part, very enjoyable. First of all, let’s give a shout out to Lorne Balfe, who developed the score for this film. First of all, he seems to capture the Middle Ages period that this fantasy film is set in. Not only that, but his score could likely sound somewhat similar to Howard Shore’s score in the Lord Of The Rings trilogy from a little over twenty years ago. And who probably wouldn’t like to hear instruments like the violin played at some points in this Dungeons & Dragons film? Most of the characters are also really well fleshed out in this film. This is especially true for Edgin, Holga, and some of the friends that they make along the way. Not only that, but the creativity that is made with some of them is also excellent, especially for characters like Doric, and Simon. The villains were also well done, even though one of them could have likely been played by a different actor. But more on that later! Overall, when it comes to their characters, even if some of them don’t have as much screen time as others, what time they do have, even with those with more minor roles, ends up being memorable, and making the film more memorable as a result. This film knows which character to truly shine the most light on, and which ones to not have as much of the spotlight. There was also some comedy gold scattered throughout this film, be it funny lines in the script, or even hilarious moments period. The makers of this movie really did seem to understand when they needed to have comic relief, or when they needed to be serious. The action also was phenomenal. One action scene in particular that takes place around the middle to end of the film is given it’s due really well. Same goes for the climax of this film as well. Oh, that’s another thing! There were some really good plot twists to this film as well. This helped keep the film engaging, and/or prevent any of the audience members from losing their interest in the film. There are also good messages about teamwork, letting your weaknesses also be your greatest strengths, and thinking about others, and putting their needs above your own.
But is this film perfect? Well, not quite. First of all, we didn’t seem to get quite as much of the dragon characters as we probably could have in the end. Yes, I understand that movies can only last for so long. Still, with this film being called Dungeons & Dragons, and being based on that game, should we not have maybe had more of those present in this film? Just a thought. As for Hugh Grant playing Forge, he was okay in that role, but either he could have done better, or the directors should have maybe picked a different actor for him. Oh, and there were one, or two plot holes in this film as well.
And that’s my review for Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves. Well, what can I say? Though not quite perfect, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves is definitely well worth your time. It is fun, engaging, has great comedy, well-written characters, good messages, and some other good elements that help make for a good fantasy film. Even if it’s not quite on par with film version of Lord Of The Rings, or The Chronicles Of Narnia films for instance, this film definitely deserves to have more of the attention of the audience. Why this film hasn’t done quite as well as say recent films like The Super Mario Bros. Movie, for instance, I’m not sure. Either way, I would say definitely please go see this film. It is most definitely one of those films that deserves to actually be experienced on the big screen. I even saw this film twice this past weekend. If neither that, or my points of why this film is good, are not convincing enough for people to go see this film, then I’m not sure what will be. So, again, I say go see Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves. You’ll have a blast, I’m sure.
Well, everyone, today, we are going to review a music special that features opera singer Andrea Bocelli. So now, let’s discuss The Journey: A Music Special With Andrea Bocelli.
Plot: The film centers around Andrea Bocelli, and his wife. It begins with a blessing from the Pope, followed by their travel on horseback from Vatican City, and along Italy’s famous Via Francigena, and into their Italian estate. Along the way, they encounter bands, and artists such as 40 Fingers, Michael W. Smith, Tauren Wells, 2 Cellos, Katherine Jenkins, and Taya Smith of Hillsong United, among others. During this journey, Andrea, and his companions perform with some of these artist, and bands, as well as get to hear some of their testimonies.
Wow, what a great film. First of all, for those of us that have had an appreciation for opera, or Christian music, how could one not like this film? Honestly, I would say that if one has at least loves opera, but isn’t a Christian, such a person should still go see this film, and hopefully with an open mind. Wow, for those of us that at least knew that Bocelli was an opera singer, but not that he was a Christian, then what a great way to find out both about him. As you watch this film, you really get to know more about Andrea Bocelli, his wife, and a bit about his kid’s lives as well. Not only that, but we get to learn more about Michael W. Smith, and Tauren Wells, and most of the other artists, and bands that we may not have known about them before. The score is also great, and it’s overall really cool to see Andrea Bocelli, and his family interact with these different people either on stage, or on the road as they travel to Bocelli’s estate (or even both). Oh, and the different musical instruments that are heard throughout this film are amazing. One other thing to mention is that, for those who are not Christians, but still see this film, that they will desire to know Jesus, and accept Him into their lives. But for those that are already Christians, and see this film, hopefully this film/documentary/music special will have their faith in Jesus strengthened even more than before. Finally, it’s amazing the lessons that can be taken away from this film, and how we, the audience, can likely have a slightly, if not fully, better, perspective on life.
And that’s my review for Journey: A Music Special With Andrea Bocelli. Honestly, one of my hopes for those that see this film is that it will help them either desire to accept Christ, or grow in their faith in Him. This is a film that has humans who are truly genuine about their faith, and their journey to finding the Lord Jesus Christ. Oh, and just having the reminder that music can have have a powerful effect on people is a great reminder too. So, if you haven’t seen this film yet, definitely try to either tonight, tomorrow night, or Thursday night. But if, for some reason, you are unable to see it, then watch for when it comes out on video. Either way, you won’t want to miss this film that will most likely have something for everyone. So, go see The Journey: A Music Special With Andrea Bocelli, and see what you think!
Okay, from what you can see of the title, you may think that we’re going to be reviewing the remake that was released on Disney+ back in September of this past year, yes? Well, actually, no. As a matter of fact, we will actually be reviewing the CGI version that was released on Netflix this past year as well, and was directed by film director Guillermo Del Toro. So now, let’s dive into that version.
Plot: Years after a tragic incident that happened with Italian wood carver Geppetto (David Bradley), he makes a wooden puppet that is brought to life by the Wood Sprite (Tilda Swinton). She then appoints Sebastian J. Cricket (Ewan McGregor) to be the voice to the new puppet, whom they name Pinocchio (Gregory Mann). With Pinocchio now brought to life, will he bring joy to Geppetto’s life, and will Pinocchio learn the main difference of right, and wrong, and do what is right in the end?
Well, based on the description of the plot above, you’re probably thinking that this plot is basically shot for shot of the 1940 Disney animated film, right? Well, not exactly! Yes, some of this film is the story of Pinocchio as we all know, and love. However, this time around, what we have here is an adaptation that is said to be a little more loyal to the 1883 novel by Carlo Collodi. Before I continue, I will say that it’s interesting how one of the characters in this film is named Carlo after that author. Anyway, Guillermo Del Toro’s version of this film is a stop motion animated film that is surprisingly very mature. Oh yes, it is still a film that even kids can enjoy too. However, it would seem as if adults might appreciate it more for some of the more adult themes, while kids will like characters such as Sebastian J. Cricket (basically Jiminy Cricket), and a monkey character named Spazzatura. Oh, and side note, Spazzatura, despite not talking, is a well developed side character with a surprisingly good character arc. The rest of the characters are well thought out too, especially the monkey, Sebastian J. Cricket, Pinocchio, Geppetto, and even the circus ringleader, Count Volpe, and not Stromboli this time around, and a good majority of the other characters too. Oh, and another thing to point out, it is interesting that this film not only had a magical fairy called the Wood Sprite, but also that the fairy would have a sister named Death, who basically is sort of like Hades in the Hercules myth in terms of running an Underworld-like realm. Anyhow, sure, the film can be a little depressing at times for kids. Still, they’ll likely enjoy all the film overall, and including some of the songs that are featured in this film. Okay, yes, the songs are rather forgettable. Still, they’re nice to listen to as well. How about the score by Alexandre Desplat. Well, he seems to have a taste of Italian culture, or at least studied it. The reason being is because he really knew how to make good Italian music for this film with the music, the instruments involved that you normally hear in Italy, and things like that. Now, how about the story itself? Well, there are some elements of this film that may be similar to other version of Pinocchio, be it the 1940 Disney animated version, the live-action version from 1996 that was made by New Line Cinema, the book itself, you name it. Nevertheless, this Pinocchio somehow knew how to have more of a fresh take on the story. Because of that being the case, it is understandable as to why the film won both a Golden Globe, and an Oscar for Best Animated Feature for this past year, despite only going to Netflix, and not to theaters. And that reminds me, why did this film go straight to Netflix, and not in theaters? Were the filmmakers anticipating this movie to not be as popular in theaters? One can only speculate. Either way, if this film was going to win some awards, then this film should have been given a chance in theaters before video, and the streaming services. One other quick thing to mention is that the ending is surprisingly a little different than you might think. The ending is actually bittersweet for reasons that I won’t go into so that you guys can see this film, and know why. Finally, this film teaches some good lessons about learning to move forward in life, even when difficult to do so, being willing to obey those in authority, asking for the right things in life, instead of asking for things selfishly, and things like that.
And that’s my review for this version of Pinocchio. Although it will share similarities with many other versions of this story, this Pinocchio does end up being more unique, and charming in it’s own way. It’s still creative, has well thought out characters, cool stop motion animation, and great heart to it overall. I would say that if you want a Pinocchio film that ends up being rather different from other versions more often than not, then definitely check out this film whenever you can. You’ll likely be amazed by what’s in store with this Pinocchio movie.
Hi, everyone! Welcome to yet another session of movie reviewing. Today, we are going to be talking about the latest offering from the DC Comics Universe. This time, we get to see the one, and only Shazam return with his crew of Superman-like heroes that fly around, and consist of both male, and female characters. So now that they’re back to take on some new villains, let’s discuss the one, and only, Shazam 2: Fury Of The Gods.
Plot: Set two years after the events of the first film, two daughters of the Greek Titan god, Atlas, the oldest, known as Hespera (Hellen Mirren), and the middle daughter, Kalypso (Lucy Liu), steal an ancient staff that belonged to an ancient god, known as The Wizard (Djimon Hounsou). When Shazam (Zachary Levi), and his team read about these ancient gods, and goddesses, particularly Hesper, Kalypso, and a third daughter of Stlas named Anthea (aka Anne, and played by Rachel Zegler), and what they’re capable of, can they stop the three daughters from using the staff to unleash chaos between their realm, known as the Gods’ Realm, and Earth?
So now, after giving the last DC film, Black Adam, a B grade back in October of this past year. Was Shazam 2: Fury Of The Gods an improvement, or worse? Well, you all will be delighted to hear that Shazam 2 is an improvement. First of all, most of the characters are more fleshed out than they seemed to be in the first Shazam film that was released back in 2019. Also, we get to see more of Shazam’s family this time around. Oh, and DC seemed to go more of a Marvel route by putting in some rather clever comedy. Seeing as Marvel had some brilliant comedy in the past, I wouldn’t be surprised if DC films would become a good competitor to future Marvel superhero films, and force them to step up their game in terms of making better jokes, and more brilliant scripts in the future. Well, time will tell, that’s for sure. Anyway, the film provides a brilliant score by composer Christophe Beck (who surprisingly also scored in films like some of the Marvel superhero films like the Ant-Man movies, for example). Let me tell you, his score does not disappoint. Also, the soundtrack is really good. It was especially great to hear some of the songs play during certain perfect moments of the film. In addition to all of this, the action is phenomenal in this film. Not only that, but the climax ends up being one of the most creative ones that either a superhero film, or an action film period could ever have. Without spoiling how the climax goes down, let’s just say that it is astonishing how well executed it ends up being in the end. There is also a really good amount of heart in this film too, especially when it comes to fleshing most of the characters out, executing the action well, and having nice heartfelt messages such as not going along with actions that are wrong, and what family is truly about. Oh, and there’s a nice surprise twist ending as well.
So, are there any downsides to this film? Well, first of all, there was a character arc that occurred near the end that, let’s just say could have maybe had a little more buildup to it. Additionally, there were certain big moments in the beginning of the film that didn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense, and felt as if those were left unexplained even by the end of the film. Finally, the world building in regards to the Gods’ Realm could have probably been expanded upon. Sure, we get to have a little bit of taste of what that world is like. Still, we could have seen more of that world somehow, and some way.
And that’s my review for Shazam 2: Fury Of The Gods. Even though it’s not one the best DC films out there, it was certainly an improvement from previous ones like Black Adam, Batman Vs. Superman, and many other DC films that had been released over the past five, or ten years. I would say that if you liked the first Shazam film, and want to see this one, definitely do so. You’ll enjoy this sequel without a doubt. So, go see Shazam 2: Fury Of The Gods. It is well worth your time, and smelter seeing on the big screen.
Alright, everyone, as we are less than ten reviews away from my 600th review, we now review a film that involves basketball. But this is most likely not any ordinary basketball movie. It is one that involves a coach that’s played by Woody Harrelson, and he has to coach some basketball players that , well, weren’t exactly his first choice at first. So now, let’s discuss the one, and only, Champions.
Plot: After minor leagues basketball coach named Marcus (Woody Harrelson) makes some big mistakes that force him to get fired, and choose between 18 months in prison, or community service that involves coaching intellectually challenged students at a local community center, he makes the latter choice. Now that he does this, will he help these new students succeed with basketball, and life overall?
Okay, from the trailers, it would seem as if this film looked somewhat silly, yes? Well, even if the movie may be a little silly at times (which was probably a mostly good thing ), there is still some heart to this film. Sure, we have seen a coach, or sports player get into trouble enough that they have to serve time in prison, or serve the community somehow (1992’s The Mighty Ducks, or 2005’s The Longest Yard, for example, anyone?). However, the way that it is handled here is handled well in terms of how the main character, and the players of his newer team each end up having really good character growth, the characters having to learn some valuable lessons, especially Coach Marcus, and things like that. Speaking of which, this film does a surprisingly good job of incorporating good lessons about learning to see things from other people’s perspectives, and not just making them see yours all the time, always showing humility, having a loving, and compassionate heart for those who may have disabilities, and some other good lessons like those. Champions also has really good acting, especially from Woody Harrelson, Cheech Marin, and Kaitlin Olson, along with the rest of the cast. Additionally, it was also really cool to see the film crew members actually seek out people who may have had disabilities in real life, and who may not have normally acted on a regular basis, and actually have them be stars in this film. In addition to all of this, the movie has some really funny lines, and hilarious moments overall. Well, truth be told, Champions seems to work really well as a combination of comedy, and drama. One other thing to mention is that the ending is handled surprisingly well. I won’t give away what happens. However, let’s just say that there are aspects of the ending that could help you have a better, and more positive outlook on life.
With all of that said, are there any negatives? Well, there are a couple. First off, the relationship between Marcus, and Alex, who is the sister of one of the players from the community team, while a good relationship, can feel a little strange at times. Not only that, but the language, and humor can go a little over the top at times. No, not to the point where this film should have been rated R, not even close. Still, not sure that it was all necessary, you know?
And that’s my review for Champions. if you like actor like Woody Harrelson, and Cheech Marin, or Amy if the other cast, and you want a mostly comedy with good heart in it, along with a film that could teach some valuable lessons to the viewer, then Champions is worth your time. The acting is good, the movie has heart, there are some valuable lessons to take away from this film, and certain aspects of the ending are very interesting to think about. All to say, definitely see Champions, and see what you think!
Ladies, and gentlemen, as of now, we will be ten more reviews from reaching Movie Review # 600. Again, that will be a surprise as to which film I do. Well, in the meantime, we will be reviewing a film in which actor Michael B. Jordan made one of his big debuts, and played the son of one of Rocky Balboa’s late good friends from the Rocky movie series. In this film, we shall follow Adonis Johnson, the circumstances that led him to meeting Rocky Balboa, and more. So, let’s discuss the first of now three Creed movies in honor of the third film being released just recently, the one, and only Creed 1.
Plot: A young man named Adonis Johnson (aka Creed later on, and played by Michael B. Jordan) has always been into fighting, and now desires to become a boxing champion. He finally gets a potential opportunity when he comes across fighting champion Rocky Balboa (Sylvester Stallone). So, will Rocky train Adonis, and help Adonis be the best fighter that he can be?
So, how is this film in comparison to the other Rocky films that came before this one? Well, I need to go, and watch those films ALL THE WAY through. However, for now, I will say that though Creed, and maybe even the sequels, might be quite as good as the predecessor, Creed is still really good. First of all, you have to admire Adonis’ determination to be the best he can be. Yes, he does start being way too violent at times, especially when we see him as a kid. However, after seeing the emotional pain that he goes through, you have an understanding of where he’s coming from. Additionally, it’s great to have a main character, like Adonis Johnson (aka Creed), who is determined to do whatever it takes to make his dreams a reality. Oh, and Adonis is also a great character in terms of being very persuasive to people who most likely need to make better decisions. Yeah, he can possibly go a little overboard at times when he does something like that, but still. And another thing! I know some people may complain that Adonis is a black person that’s the new main character for this newer trilogy. However, after we find out that Adonis is the son of Rocky’s late friend, Adrienne, it’s of course understandable as to why Adonis would be made black. So, if you are doing so, please, do not be calling this newer trilogy woke just because Adonis is the new main character, and is black. It’s obvious that new character Adonis is black in this film, and the sequels, for a reason. Anyway, I just I’d point that out. Moving on, there’s some of the other characters in this film as well. For one, there’s Sylvester Stallone’s character, Rocky. First off, let me point out Stallone does an excellent job playing the famous Rocky even here, like he did in the previous Rocky films. Second, there’s the dynamic between him, and Adonis Johnson (again aka Creed). Once, they meet, and become friends, they work well off each other, and have a great relationship. The same goes for Adonis Johnson, and love interest Bianca Taylor (Tessa Thompson). First off, their dynamic is developed well too, when it comes to their romantic relationship. Theirs is also very realistic as well. They’re honest with each other, they go through difficulties together, and Bianca learns to be supportive of Adonis’ hopes, and dreams, even when it may feel difficult to do so. Finally, as far as pros for this film go, the storyline is very well done, especially when it comes to being a Rocky film, and introducing new characters.
But are there any flaws to this film? Well, for one, there is a little bit of sensuality thrown into this film, particularly around the middle to end of this film. In addition to this, as far as Adonis goes, you do have a mostly good understanding of where he’s coming from. However, he ends up making decisions that end up being impulsive sometimes. Not only that, but because of him acting impulsive at times, and sometimes failing to see things from other people’s perspectives at points, he can also come off as being rather selfish, and arrogant. Sure, he does have a decent character arc throughout the course of the film. However, it would seem as if his character could have sometimes been handled a little better.
And that’s my review for Creed 1. It is a very good film with good heart in it, some mostly well thought out characters, a good score by Ludwig Goransson. Yes, this film could have been a little better, especially when it came to making Adonis’ a little better written. Still, overall, this film is a very good continuation of the Rocky films, and does it’s best to tie in with the other previous films. So, definitely watch it, and see what you think!
Matthew’s Animated & Live-Action Movie Reviews 